an inconvenient truth
- 格式:doc
- 大小:20.50 KB
- 文档页数:3
关于环保的英文电影
以下是几部环保主题的英文电影:
1. An Inconvenient Truth(《不方便的真相》):电影讲述了
全球变暖的严峻现状,以及如何保护环境。
2. Before the Flood(《洪水前》):莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥拍
摄的纪录片,探讨了全球变暖的原因及其对我们的世界的影响。
3. Wall-E(《机器人总动员》):这部动画片讲述了一个废弃的地球上,一台机器人与一名女性勇闯银河的冒险故事。
4. Erin Brockovich(《永远的艾琳》):这部电影基于真实故事,讲述了一名单身母亲如何揭露美国一家公司的环境犯罪。
5. A Plastic Ocean(《塑料之海》):这部纪录片探讨了塑料
垃圾对海洋环境的影响,呼吁更多人行动起来保护海洋。
考研英语美文诵读宝典60+30(晨读)Section One 诵读经典60篇Part 1 智慧人生(38篇)成功悟语(9篇)Self-RelianceWhat I had lived forVirtue of AmbitionCompanionship of BooksHow should one read a bookWork and pleasureOn achieving successMan Is Here For The Sake of Other MenWhy to mark a book青春赞歌(8篇)Problem of YouthRushAdvice to a young manIf I were a boy againYouthOn the Feeling of Immortality in YouthIfAn illusion人生真谛(9篇)How to grow oldLooks Beyond TragedyThree days to seeI will live this day as if it is my lastLove your lifeIf you want to gather honey, don’t kick over the beehive. Let it beApril Showers Bring May FlowersThe True Nobility自然之美(6篇)The most loved placeLate Summer Days in WarOnce more to the lakeAugustThe First SnowOut of Africa快乐箴言(6篇)Philosophy of ChineseThe Unhappy American WayTry to remember the good thingsDo this, and you’ll be welcome everywhereHave Faith, and Expect the BestHappiness is a journeyPart 2 名人之声(22篇)大学演讲(11篇)Don’t park 20 blocks from your destinationI Wish You Bad as Well as GoodThe Lost Children(1)The Lost Children(2)The Fringe Benefits of Failure, and the Importance of Imagination(1)The Fringe Benefits of Failure, and the Importance of Imagination(2)Advices to Avoid making the World Any Worse than It Already IsWe are What We ChooseAthenians and VisigothsNever sell your soulSee China in the Light of Her Development聚焦历史(11篇)The Generation that’s remaking ChinaThe Bishop of London's SermonThe Gettysburg AddressPeaceThe T orch has been passed to a New GenerationThe Strenuous LifeNobel Prize Acceptance SpeechThe Only Thing We Fear is Fear ItselfI Have a DreamBlood, toil, tears and sweatDuty, Honor, CountrySection Two 聚焦考研30篇真题精选(8篇)Herd MentalitySelling Classical MusicThe Amateur as CriticEducation Global workersWomen’s StressThe American Middle-Class on the PrecipiceCheap HappinessParalysis by Analysis同源时文(15篇)Electronic communications media tend to prevent communicationNothing to sell and nothing to buyOn not answering the phoneStresses of Being a CelebrityThe influence of knowledge on the way we perceive the worldWatching television and reading booksArab women’s rightsEaten awayE-publish or perishThe world’s lungsRomanies—A long roadToo narrow, too soon?Over to you, ChinaCritical thinkingThe skills from zapping ’em激情时刻(7篇)Change the inequality of the worldRemember you will be dead soonBarack Obama’s Inaugural Addr essAn Inconvenient truthTribute to Diana Three special choices Three Hamburgers。
Unit 7 Save the Planet, Save OurselvesEpisode 1: An Inconvenient Truth (Documentary)Roles: 1. Ale Gore2. Man3. Girl4. Sunbeam5. Greenhouse gases (Gs)Ale Gore:I show this because I wanna tell you a story about two teachers I had. One that I didn't like that much, the other who is a real hero to me. I had a grade schoolteacher who taught geography by pulling a map of the world down in front of theblackboard. I had a classmate in the sixth grade who raised his hand and he pointedto the outline of the east coast of South America and he pointed to the west coast ofAfrica and he asked, "Did they ever fit together?" And the teacher said, "Of coursenot. That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard." That student went on tobecome a drug addict and a ne'er-do-well. The teacher went on to become scienceadvisor in the current administration.But, you know, the teacher was actually reflecting the conclusion of the scientificestablishment of that time. Continents are so big, obviously they don't move. But,actually, as we now know, they did move. They moved apart from one another. Butat one time they did, in fact, fit together. But that assumption was a problem. Itreflected the well-known wisdom that what gets us into trouble is not what we don'tknow, it's what we know for sure that just ain't so.This is actually an important point, believe it or not, because there is another suchassumption that a lot of people have in their minds right now about global warmingthat just ain't so. The assumption is something like this. The Earth is so big we can'tpossibly have any lasting harmful impact on the Earth's environment. And maybethat was true at one time, but it's not anymore. And one of the reasons it's not trueanymore is that the most vulnerable part of the Earth's ecological system is theatmosphere. Vulnerable because it's so thin. My friend, the late Carl Sagan, used tosay, "If you had a big globe with a coat of varnish on it, the thickness of thatvarnish relative to that globe is pretty much the same as the thickness of the Earth'satmosphere "compared to the Earth itself." And it's thin enough that we are capableof changing its composition. That brings up the basic science of global warming.And I'm not gonna spend a lot of time on this because you know it well. The sunsradiation comes in the form of light waves and that heats up the Earth. And thensome of the radiation that is absorbed and warms the Earth is reradiated back intospace in the form of infrared radiation. And some of the outgoing infrared radiationis trapped by this layer of atmosphere and held inside the atmosphere. And that's agood thing because it keeps the temperature of the Earth within certain boundaries,keeps it relatively constant and livable. But the problem is this thin layer ofatmosphere is being thickened by all of the global warming pollution that's beingput up there. And what that does is it thickens this layer of atmosphere, more of theoutgoing infrared is trapped. And so the atmosphere heats up worldwide. That'sglobal warming. Now, that's the traditional explanation. Here's what I think is abetter explanation.Man: You're probably wondering why your ice cream went away.Well, Susie, the culprit isn't foreigners. It's global warming.Girl: Global...Man:Yeah.Meet Mr. Sunbeam. He comes all the way from the sun to visit Earth. Sunbeam: Hello, Earth. Just popping in to brighten your day.And now I'll be on my way.Gs:Not so fast, Sunbeam.We're greenhouse gases. You ain't going nowhere.Sunbeam: Oh, God, it hurts.Man: Pretty soon, Earth is chock-full of Sunbeams.Their rotting corpses heating our atmosphere.Girl: How do we get rid of the greenhouse gases?Man: Fortunately, our handsomest politicians came up with a cheap, last-minute way to combat global warming. Ever since 2063, we simply drop a giant ice cube into theocean every now and then.Girl: Just like Daddy puts in his drink every morning. And then he gets mad.Man: Of course, since the greenhouse gases are still building up, it takes more and more ice each time. Thus, solving the problem once and for all.Girl: But...Man: Once and for all!Episode 2: An Inconvenient Truth (Documentary)Roles: 1. Ale Gore2. Scientist3. JournalistAle Gore: 1.3 billion people.An economy that's surging.More and more energy needs.Massive coal reserves.Ale Gore: The coal belt in Northern China,Scientist: Inner Mongolia.Ale Gore: Right.Scientist: Then there's Shaanxi province. And also biggest coal mine here.Ale Gore: Up here.Scientist: Yeah.Ale Gore: Now, is that an open pit mine?Scientist: Yes.Ale Gore: Every time I've visited China, I've learned from their scientists. They're right on the cutting edge.Ale Gore: Give me some sense of the numbers of new coal fire generating plants.Scientist: Well, I have to say that the number is enormous because it's so profitable.Ale Gore: This issue is really the same for China as it is for the US.We are both using old technologies that are dirty and polluting.Ale Gore: ...more flooding and more drought and stronger storms is going up, and global warming is implicated in the pattern.Journalist: And if you were to give some suggestions to everybody here about, like, what we can do for the situation now.Ale Gore: Separating the truth from the fiction and the accurate connections from the misunderstandings is part of what you learn here. But when the warnings areaccurate and based on sound science, then we as human beings, whatever countrywe live in, have to find a way to make sure that the warnings are heard andresponded to.Ale Gore: We both have a hard time shaking loose the familiar patterns that we've relied on in the past. We both face completely unacceptable consequences.Ale Gore: And there are three factors that are causing this collision, and the first is population.When my generation, the baby boom generation, was born after World War II, thepopulation had just crossed the two billion mark. Now, I'm in my 50s, and it'salready gone to almost six and a half billion. And if I reach the demographicexpectation for the baby boomers, it'll go over nine billion. So if it takes 10,000generations to reach two billion and then in one human lifetime, ours, it goes fromtwo billion to nine billion, something profoundly different is going on right now.We're putting more pressure on the Earth. Most of it's in the poorer nations of theworld. This puts pressure on food demand. It puts pressure on water demand. It putspressure on vulnerable natural resources, and this pressure's one of the reasons whywe have seen all the devastation of the forest, not only tropical, but elsewhere. It isa political issue.Episode 3: Obama’s Earth Day Message (Speech)41 years ago, in the city of Cleveland, people watched in horror as the Cuyahoga River choked with debris and covered in oil – caught on fire. Images of the burning Cuyahoga shocked a nation, and it led one Wisconsin Senator the following year to organize the first Earth Day to call attention to the dangers of ignoring our environment.In the four decades since, we’ve made remarkable progress. Today, our air and water are cleaner, pollution has been greatly reduced, and Americans everywhere are living in a healthier environment. We’ve passed the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, and founded the Environmental Protection Agency. And in Cleveland, the Cuyahoga River is cleaner than it’s been in 100 years. But the true story of environmental movement is not about the laws that have been passed. It’s about the citizens who have come together time and time again to demand cleaner air, healthier drinking water and safer food, and who have demanded that their representatives in government hold polluters accountable.That progress continues today, as individuals and entrepreneurs across the country help lay the foundation for a Clean Energy Economy – one solar panel, smart meter and energy efficient house at a time. Since taking office, my administration has been a partner in the fight for a healthier environment. Through the Recovery Act, we’ve invested in clean energy and clean water infrastructure across the country. We’re taking the necessary steps to keep our children safe and hold polluters accountable. And we’ve rejected the notion that we have to choose between creating jobs and a healthy environment – because we know that the economy of the 21st century will be built on infrastructure powered by clean energy. But even though we’ve made significant progress there is much more to do. And as we continue to tackle our environmental challenges, it’s clear that change won’t come from Washington alone. It will come from Americans across the country, who take steps in their own homes and their own communities to make that change happen.That’s why, as we get ready to celebrate the 40th anniversary of Earth Day, I want to leave you with a challenge. I want you to take action – in your home or your community; at your school or your business – to improve our environment. It can be as simple as riding the bus or the subwayto work, making your home more energy efficient, or organizing your neighbors to clean up a nearby park.Episode 4: The Day After Tomorrow (Movie Clip)Roles: 1. Anchorwoman (W)2. Journalist 1 (J1), Journalist 2 (J2), Journalist 3 (J3)4. Man (M)5. Tom (T)6. Jack (J)7. Vice President (VP)W:We have live coverage now from our Fox 11 chopper. Are you there, Bart?J1:Yes, I'm here. These tornados are forming so fast--W: Bart!J1:What? Oh! Oh, my God. Lisa, are you getting this on camera? This tornado just came and erased the Hollywood sign. The Hollywood sign is gone. It's just shredded.W: Bart, what can you see? Is anyone hurt?J1: I wouldn't be surprised. There is so much damage down there. And there are people down there taking pictures.M:Hey, what the hell are you guys doing? Go for cover! You can't stay here! Get out of here! J2: What you're seeing are two actual tornados striking Los Angeles lnternational Airport.Wait. It looks like they've joined and formed one large tornado.J3:Tommy!J2:Oh, my God! Holy shit!W: but local residents aren 't taking any chances......as people stock up for what is already being billed as the worst storm season on record. T:Better be sure about this, Jack. My ass is on the line.J:You saw the model.T:And I hope to God it's wrong.Mr. Vice President.VP: Tom.T:You know Professor Hall.VP: Yes, we've met.T:Professor Hall has some information I think you should take a look at.J:We just got these results from our simulation model. They explain what's causing this severe weather.VP: Look, I'll have to look at it later. I have the meeting with the director of FEMA right now—J: This is very urgent. Our climate is changing violently. It's going to happen over the next six days to weeks.VP: You said this wouldn't happen for another 100 years or so.J: I was wrong.VP: Well, I suppose you're wrong this time.J: I wish that I were, but I'm sure that you're aware of what's happening all around the world. VP: We're making all the necessary preparations for this storm. What more do you expect?J: You have to start thinking about large-scale evacuations right now. Especially in the Northern states.VP: Evacuations?J: Yes.VP: You lost your mind, Hall. Have to go.J: Mr. Vice President! If we don't act now, it's going to be too late.Key to ExercisesUnit 7 Save the Planet, Save OurselvesGetting started:1. C2. D3. D4. A5. A6. B7. C8. D9. B 10. BEpisode 1: An Inconvenient Truth (Documentary)Exercise 1:3. 2. 1.4. 6. 7.5.Exercise 2:1.wondering2.all the way from the sun3.popping in4.hurts5.rotting corpses6.get rid of7.handsomestst-minute9.ice cube10.once and for allEpisode 2: An Inconvenient Truth (Documentary)Exercise 1:1.old technologies that are dirty and polluting2.shaking loose the familiar patternpletely unacceptable consequencesExercise 2:1.We have to find a way to make sure that the warnings are heard and responded to.2.The generation is called the baby boom generation. They were born after World War II.3.When he was born the number of population was about 2 billion. When he reaches his 50s, thenumber has already gone to almost 6.5 billion. I f he reaches the demographic expectation for his generation, it will go over 9 billion.4.It puts pressure on food demand, water demand and vulnerable natural resources.5.It will lead to the devastation of forest not only tropical but elsewhere.Episode 3: Obama’s Earth Day Message (Speech)Exercise 1:1.T2. F3. F4. F5. TExercise 2:1. a healthier environment2.clean energy3.clean water infrastructure4.we have to choose between creating jobs and a healthy environment5.we’ve made significant progress6.tackle our environmental challenges7.take steps in their own homes and their own communities8.leave you with a challenge9.riding the bus or the subway to work10.more energy efficientEpisode 4: The Day After Tomorrow (Movie Clip)Exercise 1:1.The tornado has shredded the Hollywood sign.2.They were taking pictures.3.It means “I am taking a big risk”.4.Jack was wrong about the time when the New Ice Age would come.5.Jack’s suggestion to the vice president is large scale of evacuation.Exercise 2:1.We’ve met2.I think you should take a look at3.simulation model4.severe weather5.changing violently6.what’s happening all around the world7.all the necessary preparationrge-scale evacuation9.You lost your mind10.it’s going to be too late[文档可能无法思考全面,请浏览后下载,另外祝您生活愉快,工作顺利,万事如意!]。
难以忽视的真相 An Inconvenient Truth 英文影评 review by James BerardinelliThe problem with An Inconvenient Truth isn't the message; it's the messenger. If the film's goal is to educate and warn about Global Warming, why use one of the most divisive political figures of the last decade as the spokesman? I don't have a problem with Al Gore, but how many Republicans (and possibly even Independents) are going to be interested in spending 100 minutes listening to the ex-Vice President talking about Global Warming? Thus, instead of a wake-up call, this film - which is an excellent primer about the situation - turns into a sermon for the choir.The documentary makes two additional missteps that hurt its credibility and will diminish its widespread acceptance. There are times when, via biographical snippets and personal reflections from its central figure, it seems to be more about Gore than Global Warming. And, despite what others have written, there is a clear, albeit subtle, political bias. When the film wants to illustrate the obtuseness of politicians concerning Global Warming, it uses sound bytes from several prominent men - all Republicans. Would it have been so hard to find an anti-Global Warming Democrat to strike a sense of balance? All this is fine - director Davis Guggenheim has a right to slant his film any way he wants to - but it limits the film's appeal and consumer base.Content-wise, An Inconvenient Truth contains compelling information. It also avoids the polarization that often surrounds discussions of Global Warming. Like an anti-Conspiracy Theory movie, it debunks several of the myths perpetrated by those who ignore scientific data while not embracing the sky-is-falling hysteria embraced by some fringe believers. When it's not giving us glimpses into Al Gore's childhood or recapping the 2000 election, An Inconvenient Truth sticks to the science of the situation. There are charts and graphs and, perhaps most disturbingly, "before and after" pictures of glaciers as they were 30 years ago and as they are today. (It gives "shrinkage" a whole new meaning.) If the movie comes across as alarmist, that's because the situation is alarming, not because the filmmakers are employing hyperbole. As is pointed out, Global Warming is viewed within the scientific community as a fact, not a theory. It's only Big Business, with its desire to maximize profits (after all, it costs money to cut back the amount of carbon dioxide escaping into the atmosphere) that has tried to position Global Warming as a subject that is open to debate.If you have studied the subject at any length, the film is not going to provide any new material. This is a well-packaged recap of known facts. If you accept that Global Warming is real and understand its implications, you can easily skip An Inconvenient Truth. If not, then this becomes an important film to consider. Although it deals with scientific realities, it couches its message in words and images that the layman can understand. There's only one instance in which it enters scientifically uncertain territory: trying to link Hurricane Katrina with Global Warming. Is it possible that there's a connection? Yes, but it's not proven, and the cyclical nature of hurricanes makes this a dubious argument.v The film is inherently non-cinematic. It could almost be considered a "concert film" (although without the music - don't worry, Al Gore don't pretend he's on American Idol), since it's essentially a filmed version of one of Gore's well-known Global Warming slideshows. For about 90 minutes of the 100-minute running time, Gore talks to us (he doesn't lecture) about the subject, using a variety of slides (and even an animated cartoon) to make his point. It should be no surprise that the presentation is as polished as it is - Gore estimates he has given it more than 1000 times over a span of more than 20 years.Despite its flaws and the familiarity of the material, I was engaged by the movie. The clarity and simplicity of the presentation is remarkable. Gore is a likable, confident, humorous speaker. And the material reminds us of the need for vigilance. If only a few viewers learn some things about Global Warming, then the movie has done a worthy job. However?Critics are constantly reminded to review the movie that exists, not the one that doesn't, but in the case of An Inconvenient Truth, the message is so important that I can't help but wonder if this doesn't constitute, on some level, a missed opportunity.2Critics have labeled Al Gore and his decades-long crusade to curb global warming as "alarmist." But if you've been warning people that the sky is falling for more than 20 years and it really is falling (or at least heating up), don't you have an obligation to sound an alarm?The highly persuasive documentary "An Inconvenient Truth" captures Gore delivering a multimedia presentation he has given an estimated 1,000 times since 1989. The talk is augmented with an impressive array of graphs, animation, anecdotes and statistics that convey a flurry of facts,projections and conjecture, all pointing to the ill effects the present rate of emissions has on the environment. A film with a clear point of view (and little room for others), it is the inspiration of producers Laurie David and Lawrence Bender, who attended Gore's lecture, decided it had to be made into a film to broaden the reach of its message and recruited director Davis Guggenheim to shoot it.Guggenheim intercuts the lecture with footage of Gore on the road, studiously working out his presentation on his ubiquitous laptop, and segments that effectively show the crucible moments in his life that led him to continually rededicate himself to this topic. There's the college professor who first taught him about climate change in the late 1960s, the death of Gore's sister Nancy from cancer and the 1989 accident that nearly claimed the life of his son. While the vignettes establish Gore's long-term commitment, unfortunately there's a slickness to them that plays like a campaign film that might be shown at a political convention.Gore might not be anybody's idea of a pitchman, but here he's matched with the right topic, one for which he demonstrates real passion. He's charming, intelligent, professorial and one might even say … presidential. In fact, more than one observer has commented that if this Al Gore had been more visible during the 2000 election there may have been a different outcome.Rather than alarmed, Gore comes off as poised, relaxed and confident. Guggenheim sets up Citizen Al as part rock star, part eco-Buddha. He introduces himself to a small audience saying, "I'm Al Gore, and I used to be the next president of the United States." The line gets a laugh and quickly addresses the considerable baggage that comes with being on the losing end of one of the most divisive political outcomes in U.S. history.This position has its pros and cons for the film. On the plus side, Gore stands tall as an insider pushed to the fringe, a man on a mission with nothing to lose. He's able to attack the issue without equivocation. On the minus side, it's easy for naysayers to claim that the digs he makes at conservatives are sour grapes and he's merely positioning himself to run again in 2008 — though this would appear to be a longshot issue on which to do so.The environment has not resonated much with voters or politicians in the past, though the increasing popularity of hybrid cars and eco-friendly products and services might indicate a shift in attitudes. That something so important could be largely ignored for so long is almost inconceivable, and among the things the film does well is an analysis as to why that is.A 2004 Science magazine survey of more than 900 peer-reviewed academic papers on the subject of global warming found that all supported thereality while none contested it. However, a like sampling of mainstream media found that 53% of the stories portrayed global warming as something that was in doubt in the scientific community. The mixed message has kept the automobile and oil industries in the driver's seat and the issue out of political debates.Gore also does an excellent job of explaining the basic science behind climate change and the accelerated rise in temperatures since the 1970s. What could be very dry material is enlivened by Gore's geniality and desire to share the information. The potential for dreaded heaviosity is leavened at times by his dry wit and humorous moments, such as a clip from Matt Groening's animated series "Futurama."Real and projected catastrophes reveal what is at stake. Glacier erosion, the threat to wildlife and the spread of deadly viruses make for some terrifying scenarios. Hurricane Katrina and other weather-related disasters that occurred in late 2005 are included, giving the film a sense of timeliness and a powerful visual element, which Gore compares to "a nature hike through the Book of Revelations."The other strong point that Gore makes is to dispute the "either/or" argument presented by big business when it comes to making the necessary changes. He uses Upton Sinclair's quote, "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it," to not-so-subtly stress the motivation behind this line of thinking.The film's title refers to politicians' apprehensiveness in addressing the problem. Attempts at strict environmental reform have long been met with gloomy projections from the right of economic disaster in the form of lost jobs and factory closures, and Gore rebuts this by suggesting that green business can be good business.Although the message of the film sounds bleak, it is actually quite rousing. Gore offers measures that can be taken on personal and community levels but also stresses that major changes require a larger response. The film's ultimate significance is that this requires political will —which Gore labels a "renewable resource" —and that if our present representatives are not up to the challenge, we elect men and women who are.3I want to write this review so every reader will begin it and finish it.I am a liberal, but I do not intend this as a review reflecting any kindof politics. It reflects the truth as I understand it, and it represents, I believe, agreement among the world's experts.Global warming is real.It is caused by human activity.Mankind and its governments must begin immediate action to halt and reverse it.If we do nothing, in about 10 years the planet may reach a "tipping point" and begin a slide toward destruction of our civilization and most of the other species on this planet.After that point is reached, it would be too late for any action.These facts are stated by Al Gore in the documentary "An Inconvenient Truth." Forget he ever ran for office. Consider him a concerned man speaking out on the approaching crisis. "There is no controversy about these facts," he says in the film. "Out of 925 recent articles inpeer-review scientific journals about global warming, there was no disagreement. Zero."He stands on a stage before a vast screen, in front of an audience. The documentary is based on a speech he has been developing for six years, and is supported by dramatic visuals. He shows the famous photograph "Earthrise," taken from space by the first American astronauts. Then he shows a series of later space photographs, clearly indicating that glaciers and lakes are shrinking, snows are melting, shorelines are retreating.He provides statistics: The 10 warmest years in history were in the last 14 years. Last year South America experienced its first hurricane. Japan and the Pacific are setting records for typhoons. Hurricane Katrina passed over Florida, doubled back over the Gulf, picked up strength from unusually warm Gulf waters, and went from Category 3 to Category 5. There are changes in the Gulf Stream and the jet stream. Cores of polar ice show that carbon dioxide is much, much higher than ever before in a quarter of a million years. It was once thought that such things went in cycles. Gore stands in front of a graph showing the ups and downs of carbon dioxide over the centuries. Yes, there is a cyclical pattern. Then, in recent years, the graph turns up and keeps going up, higher and higher, off the chart.The primary man-made cause of global warming is the burning of fossil fuels. We are taking energy stored over hundreds of millions of years in the formof coal, gas and oil, and releasing it suddenly. This causes global warming, and there is a pass-along effect. Since glaciers and snow reflect sunlight but sea water absorbs it, the more the ice melts, the more of the sun's energy is retained by the sea.Gore says that although there is "100 percent agreement" among scientists, a database search of newspaper and magazine articles shows that 57 percent question the fact of global warming, while 43 percent support it. These figures are the result, he says, of a disinformation campaign started in the 1990s by the energy industries to "reposition global warming as a debate." It is the same strategy used for years by the defenders of tobacco. My father was a Luckys smoker who died of lung cancer in 1960, and 20 years later it was still "debatable" that there was a link between smoking and lung cancer. Now we are talking about the death of the future, starting in the lives of those now living."The world won't 'end' overnight in 10 years," Gore says. "But a point will have been passed, and there will be an irreversible slide into destruction."In England, Sir James Lovelock, the scientist who proposed the Gaia hypothesis (that the planet functions like a living organism), has published a new book saying that in 100 years mankind will be reduced to "a few breeding couples at the Poles." Gore thinks "that's too pessimistic. We can turn this around just as we reversed the hole in the ozone layer. But it takes action right now, and politicians in every nation must have the courage to do what is necessary. It is not a political issue. It is a moral issue."When I said I was going to a press screening of "An Inconvenient Truth,"a friend said, "Al Gore talking about the environment! Bor...ing!" This is not a boring film. The director, Davis Guggenheim, uses words, images and Gore's concise litany of facts to build a film that is fascinating and relentless. In 39 years, I have never written these words in a movie review, but here they are: You owe it to yourself to see this film. If you do not, and you have grandchildren, you should explain to them why you decided not to.Am I acting as an advocate in this review? Yes, I am. I believe that to be "impartial" and "balanced" on global warming means one must take a position like Gore's. There is no other view that can be defended. Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), chairman of the Senate Environment Committee, has said, "Global warming is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people." I hope he takes his job seriously enough to see this film. I think he has a responsibility to do that.What can we do? Switch to and encourage the development of alternative energy sources: Solar, wind, tidal, and, yes, nuclear. Move quickly toward hybrid and electric cars. Pour money into public transit, and subsidize the fares. Save energy in our houses. I did a funny thing when I came home after seeing "An Inconvenient Truth." I went around the house turning off the lights.4You can say whatever you like about the politics of former Senator and Vice President Al Gore, and you can even be skeptical about his message as delivered in his documentary about global warming, An Inconvenient Truth, but at the very least, he does make a compelling case for anyone that watches it to find out more about the situation. While most Liberal viewers out there will believe everything Gore says chapter and verse, and Conservatives will no doubt dismiss it as more misguided, tree-hugging scare tactics, if you keep an open mind to the presentation as delivered, it's almost impossible not to feel that self-education regarding the global warming issue has become an immediate concern that merits thorough investigation before dismissing as "Chicken Little" nonsense.The strength of the documentary's impetus comes from the affability and mild-mannered approach by the main presenter of its information. The main weakness of it is that that person is Al Gore. It's not because Al Gore isn't an eloquent speaker and respectable leader worthy of presenting such volatile, and potentially cataclysmic, information -- as a famous politician that has been on the forefront of the environmental movement, there are few other recognizable names that could have even gotten this film made. The fact is that Gore's presence has the double-edged quality that will galvanize the political base that firmly believes in the environmental movement while keeping those that should rightfully hear the information, namely, closed-minded Conservatives, completely at bay.Most staunch Conservatives will refuse to believe anything Gore has to say on the matter, regardless of how many facts he is able to back up, probably dismissing every learned scientist, scholarly journal, and news article as more evidence of a Liberal political agenda that seeks to take away prime and lucrative industries in the world that employ millions of hard-working people. Ironic that the same people that see every syllable uttered by Gore as tainted lies will take everything said byprovocateurs like Rush Limbaugh as gospel, without the need for scientific evidence to support his theories to label them as indubitable truth.Another double-edged quality to the film lies in the amount of personal information about Al Gore that director Guggenheim deemed necessary to include. Within the construct of the slide presentation, we are taken outside of it to learn several anecdotes about Gore's upbringing and tidbits regarding the most interesting facets of his life. The intended effect is to make Gore seem more trustworthy and likeable, and therefore, not some empty suit lobbyist or wacko with a crazy agenda. While it is successful on this front, there are moments when you begin to wonder if the film isn't driven by the need to compel us into more environmentally friendly pursuits than in the redemption of Al Gore as a person and political entity ruined by the divisive election of 2000. However, on the other hand, Gore actually does manage to tie in this anecdotal material into the overall message, even if only tangentially, so credit them for trying to take a more personal, emotionally resonant, and friendly approach, while still sticking to theme.An Inconvenient Truth may not be the most exciting film released in the Summer of 2006, but it is probably the most important, especially for those that don't want to believe such a dire situation exists. You may not have voted for Gore, and you may not even like him personally; listen to the message, if not the messenger, and then do your own studies on the situation from actual scientific sources -- not radio personality political pundits with knee-jerk claims of "Chicken Little" like boys who cry wolf.Removing my own personal and political beliefs and just taking this as a film, it is effectively presented and fascinating in its information, even if somewhat dry at times for those not accustomed to listening to what amounts to be a lecture, albeit a flashy one. Perhaps having excerpts of interviews with actual scientific scholars and leaders would have been a better way to strengthen Gore's claims than showing his boyhood home and family, but Gore's message still is able to get out there, and possibly affect thousands of people and the way they think -- perhaps even millions once it hits video and TV, An Inconvenient Truth may have shortcomings in certain respects, and it may not alter the course of the world as it intends, but it just might change your life, and for that alone, it deserves to be called one of the most powerful and important films of 2006.。
随堂看了戈尔先生的演讲,感觉一个多小时的时间不知不觉就过去了,回来发现,果然,这并不只是一次演讲,也是一部获得了第79届奥斯卡金像奖最佳纪录片讲的影片,英文片名为An Inconvenient Truth,中文字幕翻译的是难以忽视的真相,但我感觉这是一个令人沉重的真相。
影片的开始,一颗蓝白相间的美丽球体呈现在屏幕上,这就是我们的地球,仅仅从它的太空影像看,就能感觉这是一个与众不同的星球,是一个富有生机的星球,正是因为有了生命,才使地球如此美丽。
记得之前在地理课中学过,地球在太阳系中所处的位置使地球可以有液态水的存在,而水是生命存在的必要条件,但科学仍然不能解释生命是如何产生的。
我也常常思考,或许这一切,包括最初地球的出现,生命的形成,再到人这种智慧生物的产生,都是某些偶然的事件导致,然后才有了后来的发展直到现在,所有的一切真是美妙的偶然,但哲学上讲偶然其实也是一种必然,那我们的地球,未来的必然是什么?影片公布了大量真实的景象,我之前只是断断续续了解过其中的一些,但这么多的事实摆在面前是却让人触目惊心。
之前很长的时间大气的二氧化碳含量都没有超过300,但最近这种温室气体的含量早已将300这个数字甩在后面。
乞力马扎罗山、阿尔卑斯山的一些白色的雪峰已变成了棕色;两极冰川的冰块绝望的坠入海洋;有关世界末日的影片中才会出现的巨大海啸、疯狂的龙卷风正在肆虐;无助的人在洪涝中呼喊,干涸龟裂的土地寸草不生,不止这些,科学家第一次发现竟然有北极熊淹死在海水中,冰川大量融化,使它们无处落脚,虽然是动画中的北极熊,但也让人鼻子发酸;永冻土已经大量开始解冻,建筑在上面的房屋一夜之间倒塌,森林全部歪斜;格陵兰已有大面积融化,如果以这个速度继续,全球海平面将提升二十尺,淹没大面积沿海地区,荷兰这样的低地国家将不复存在;南极冰岬已有很大断裂,冰原内部出现黑洞,海水不断涌入……也许,就在不久的将来,世界地图将重新绘制,这是多么可怕的事情。
You look at that rivergently flowing by.You notice the leavesrustling发出沙沙的声音with the wind.You hear the birds.You hear the tree frogs.ln the distance, you hear a cow.You feel the grass.The mud gives a little bit on the river bank.lt's quiet. lt's peaceful.And all of a sudden,it's a gear shift inside you.And it's like taking a deep breath and going,"Oh, yeah, l forgot about this."This is the first picture of the Earth from space that any of us ever saw.It was taken on Christmas Eve, 1968during the ApoIIo 8 Mission....within relatively comfortable boundaries.But we are fiIIing up that thin shell of atmosphere with poIIution.Ladies and gentlemen, Mr. Al Gore.I am AI Gore.I used to be the next president of the United States Of America.I don't find that particularly funny.l've been trying to tell this story for a long time,and l feel as if l've failed to get the message across.l was in politics for a long time and l'm proud of my service.You gotta be kidding me. This is a national disaster.Get every doggone Greyhound bus line in the country,and get their...moving to New Orleans.That's them thinking small, man,and this is a major, major, major deal.What do you need right now?There are good people,who are in politics in both partieswho hold this at arm's lengthbecause if they acknowledge it and recognize it,then the moral imperative必要的事,必须完成的事to make big changes is inescapable. ...unless you fix the biggest damn crisis in the history of this country....scouted out landing spots and they Lost radio contactwhen they went around the dark side of the moon.And there was inevitably some suspense悬念.Then when they came back in radio contact,they Looked up and they snapped拍快照this picture, and it became known as Earth Rise.And that one picture exploded in the consciousness of humankind. 激发了人类的自省It leads to dramatic戏剧性的changes.Within 18 months of this picture, the modern environmental movement had begun.The next picture was taken on the Last of the ApoIIo missions,ApoIIo 1 7.This one was taken on December 11 , 1972,and it is the most commonly published photograph in all of history.And it's the onIy picture of the Earth from space that we havewhere the sun was directIy behind the spacecraftso that the Earth is fuIIy Iit up and not partIy in darkness.The next image I'm gonna show you has aImost never been seen.It was taken by a spacecraft caIIed The Galileo that went out to expIore the soIar system.And as it was Ieaving Earth's gravity, it turned its cameras aroundand took a time Lapse picture of one day's worth of rotation旋转, here compressed into压缩成24 seconds.Isn't that beautifuI? This image is a magical image in a way在某种程度上. It was made by a friend of mine, Tom Van Sant.He took 3,000 separate satellite picturestaken over a three-year period, digitally stitched together数字技术拼接而成. And he chose images that wouId give a cIoud-free viewof every square inch of the Earth's surface.AII of the Land masses accurateIy portrayed绘制.When that's aII spread out, it becomes an iconic标志性的image.I show this because I wanna teII you a story about two teachers I had.One that I didn't Iike that much, the other who is a reaI hero to me.I had a grade schooI teacher who taught geographyby puIIing a map of the worId down in front of the bIackboard.I had a cIassmate in the sixth grade who raised his handand he pointed to the outline轮廓of the east coast of South Americaand he pointed to the west coast of Africaand he asked, ''Did they ever fit together?''And the teacher said,''Of course not. That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.''That student went on to进入become a drug addict吸毒成瘾者and a ne'er-do-weII.The teacher went on to become science advisor in the current administration 政府,内阁.But, you know, the teacher was actuaIIy reflectingthe conclusion of the scientific establishment of that time.Continents are so big, obviousIy they don't move.But, actually, as we now know, they did move.They moved apart from one another.But at one time they did, in fact, fit together.But that assumption was a probIem.It refIected the well-known wisdomthat what gets us into troubIe is not what we don't know,it's what we know for sure that just ain't so.This is actuaIIy an important point, beIieve it or not,because there is another such assumptionthat a Iot of peopIe have in their minds right now about gIobaI warmingthat just ain't so.The assumption is something Iike this. The Earth is so bigwe can't possibIy have any Iasting harmfuI impacton the Earth's environment.And maybe that was true at one time, but it's not anymore.And one of the reasons it's not true anymoreis that the most vuInerabIe part of the Earth's ecological systemis the atmosphere.Vulnerable because it's so thin.My friend, the Late已故的CarI Sagan, used to say,''If you had a big gIobe with a coat of varnish漆on it,''the thickness of that varnish reIative to that gIobe''is pretty much the same''as the thickness of the Earth's atmosphere''compared to the Earth itseIf.''And it's thin enoughthat we are capabIe of changing its composition构成成分.That brings up the basic science of gIobaI warming.And I'm not gonna spend a Iot of time on this because you know it weII.The sun's radiation comes in in the form of Light wavesand that heats up the Earth.And then some of the radiation that is absorbed and warms the Earthis reradiated back into spacein the form of infrared radiation红外线.And some of the outgoing infrared radiation is trapped困住by this Iayer of atmosphere and heId inside the atmosphere.And that's a good thing because it keeps the temperature of the Earthwithin certain boundaries,keeps it relatively constant恒定的and Livable.But the probIem is this thin Iayer of atmosphere is being thickenedby aII of the gIobaI warming poIIution that's being put up there.And what that does is it thickens this Iayer of atmosphere,more of the outgoing infrared is trapped.And so the atmosphere heats up worldwide. That's gIobaI warming.Now, that's the traditionaI expIanation.Here's what I think is a better expIanation.You're probabIy wondering why your ice cream went away.WeII, Susie, the culprit犯过错者isn't foreigners.It's gIobaI warming.#NAME?Meet Mr. Sunbeam.He comes all the way from the sun to visit Earth.HeIIo, Earth. Just popping in to brighten your day.And now I'II be on my way.Not so fast, Sunbeam.We're greenhouse gases. You ain't going nowhere.Oh, God, it hurts.Pretty soon, Earth is chock-full of Sunbeams.Their rotting腐烂的corpses heating our atmosphere.How do we get rid of the greenhouse grasses?FortunateIy, our handsomest poIiticianscame up with a cheap, Last-minute way to combat对抗gIobaI warming. Ever since 2063,we simply drop a giant ice cube立方体into the ocean every now and then不时.Just Iike Daddy puts in his drink every morning.And then he gets mad.Of course, since the greenhouse gases are still building up,it takes more and more ice each time.Thus, soIving the probIem once and for all一劳永逸的.-But... -Once and for aII!This is the image that started mein my interest in this issue.And I saw it when I was a coIIege studentbecause I had a professor named Roger ReveIIewho was the first person to propose measuring测量carbon dioxide二氧化碳in the Earth's atmosphere.He saw where the story was goingafter the first few chapters.After the first few years of data,he intuited what it meantfor what was yet to come.They designed the experiment in 1957.He hired Charles David Keelingwho was very faithful and precisein making these measurements for decades.They started sending these weather balloons up every dayand they chose the middle of the Pacificbecause it was the area that was most remote.And he was a very hard-nosed scientist.He really emphasized the hard data.lt was a wonderful time for mebecause, like a lot of young people,l came into contact with intellectual ferment,ideas that l'd never consideredin my wildest dreams before.And he showed our classthe results of his measurements after only a few years.lt was startling to me.Now he was startledand made it clear to our classwhat he felt the significance of it was.And l just soaked it up like a sponge.He drew the connectionsbetween the larger changes in our civilizationand this pattern that was now visiblein the atmosphere of the entire planet.And then he projected into the future where this was headedunless we made some adjustments.And it was just as clear as day.After the first seven, eight, nine years,you couId see the pattern that was deveIoping.But I asked a question.Why is it that it goes up and down once each year?And he expIained that if you Iook at the Iand mass of the Earth,very IittIe of it is south of the equator.The vast majority of it is north of the equator,and most of the vegetation is north of the equator.And so, when the Northern Hemisphere is tiIted toward the sun,as it is in our spring and summer,the Ieaves come out and they breathe in carbon dioxide,and the amount in the atmosphere goes down.But when the Northern Hemisphere is tiIted away from the sun,as it is in our faII and winter,the Ieaves faII and exhaIe carbon dioxide,and the amount in the atmosphere goes back up again.And so, it's as if the entire Earthonce each year breathes in and out.So we started measuring carbon dioxide in 1958.And you can seethat by the middIe '60s, when he showed my cIass this image,it was aIready cIear that it was going up.I respected him and Iearned from him so much, I foIIowed this.And when I went to the Congress in the middIe 1970s,I heIped to organize the first hearings on gIobaI warmingand asked my professor to come and be the Ieadoff witness.And I thought that wouId have such a big impact,we'd be on the way to soIving this probIem, but it didn't work that way. But I kept having hearings. And in 1984 I went to the Senateand reaIIy dug deepIy into this issuewith science roundtabIes and the Iike.I wrote a book about it, ran for President in 1988,partIy to try to gain some visibiIity for that issue.And in 1992 went to the White House. We passed a version of a carbon tax and some other measures to try to address this.Went to Kyoto in 1997 to heIp get a treatythat's so controversiaI, in the US at Ieast.In 2000,my opponent pIedged to reguIate CO2 and then...That was not a pIedge that was kept.But the point of this isaII this time you can seewhat I have seen aII these years.It just keeps going up. It is reIentIess.And now we're beginning to see the impact in the reaI worId.This is Mount KiIimanjaro more than 30 years agoand more recentIy.And a friend of mine just came back from KiIimanjarowith a picture he took a coupIe of months ago.Another friend, Lonnie Thompson, studies gIaciers.Here's Lonnie with a Iast sIiver of one of the once mighty gIaciers. Within the decade there wiII be no more snows of KiIimanjaro.This is happening in GIacier NationaI Park.I cIimbed to the top of this in 1998 with one of my daughters. Within 15 years, this wiII be the park formerIy known as GIacier. Here is what's been happening year by year to the CoIumbia GIacier. It just retreats every singIe year.And it's a shame 'cause these gIaciers are so beautifuI.But those who go up to see them,here's what they're seeing every day, now.In the HimaIayas there's a particuIar probIembecause 40% of aII the peopIe in the worIdget their drinking water from rivers and spring systemsthat are fed more than haIf by the meIt watercoming off the gIaciers.And within this next haIf century those 40% of the peopIe on Earth are gonna face a very serious shortagebecause of this meIting.ItaIy, the ItaIian AIps.Same sight today.An oId postcard from SwitzerIand.Throughout the AIps, we're seeing the same story.It's aIso true in South America.This is Peru 15 years ago.And the same gIacier today.This is Argentina 20 years ago. Same gIacier today.Seventy-five years ago in Patagonia on the tip of South America. This vast expanse of ice is now gone.There's a message in this.There's a message in this.It is worIdwide.And the ice has stories to teII us.My friend, Lonnie Thompson, digs core driIIs in the ice.They dig downand they bring the core driIIs back up and they Iook at the iceand they study it.When the snow faIIs, it traps IittIe bubbIes of atmosphereand they can go in and measurehow much CO2 was in the atmosphere the year that that snow feII. What's even more interesting, I think, isthey can measure the different isotopes of oxygenand figure out a very precise thermometerand teII you what the temperature wasthe year that that bubbIe was trapped in the snow as it feII.When I was in Antarctica, I saw cores Iike this.And a guy Iooked at it. He said,''Right here is where the US Congress passed the CIean Air Act.'' And I couIdn't beIieve it.But you can see the difference with the naked eye.Just a coupIe of years after that Iaw was passed,it's very cIearIy distinguishabIe.They can count back year by yearthe same way a forester reads tree rings.And you can see each annuaI Iayer from the meIting and re-freezing, so they can go back in a Iot of these mountain gIaciers 1 ,000 years. And they constructed a thermometer of the temperature.The bIue is coId and the red is warm.Now, I show this for a coupIe of reasons.Number one, the so-caIIed skeptics wiII sometimes say,''Oh, this whoIe thing, this is a cycIicaI phenomenon.''There was a medievaI warming period, after aII.''WeII, yeah, there was. There it is, right there.There are two others.But compared to what's going on now,there's just no comparison.So if you Iook at 1 ,000 years' worth of temperatureand compare it to 1 ,000 years of CO2,you can see how cIoseIy they fit together.Now, 1 ,000 years of CO2 in the mountain gIaciers,that's one thing.But in Antarctica, they can go back 650,000 years.This incidentaIIy is the first timeanybody outside of a smaII group of scientists has seen this image. This is the present day era,and that's the Iast ice age.Then it goes up. We're going back in time now 650,000 years. That's the period of warming between the Iast two ice ages.That's the second and third ice age back.Fourth, fifth, sixthand seventh ice age back.Now, an important point.In aII of this time, 650,000 years,the CO2 IeveI has never gone above300 parts per miIIion.Now, as I said, they can aIso measure temperature.Here's what the temperature has been on our Earth.Now, one thing that kind of jumps out at you is...WeII, Iet me put it this way. If my cIassmate from the sixth grade that taIked about Africa and South America were here,he wouId say, ''Did they ever fit together?''''Most ridicuIous thing I've ever heard.''But they did, of course.And the reIationship is actuaIIy very compIicated.But there is one reIationship that is far more powerfuIthan aII the others and it is this.When there is more carbon dioxide, the temperature gets warmer because it traps more heat from the sun inside.In the parts of the United States that contain the modern citiesof CIeveIand, Detroit, New York, in the northern tier,this is the difference between a nice dayand having a miIe of ice over your head.Keep that in mind when you Iook at this fact.Carbon dioxide,having never gone above 300 parts per miIIion,here is where CO2 is now.Way above where it's ever beenas far back as this record wiII measure.Now, if you'II bear with me, I wanna reaIIy emphasize this point.The crew herehas tried to teach me how to use this contraption here.So, if I don't kiII myseIf, I'II...It's aIready right here.Look how far above the naturaI cycIe this is,and we've done that.But, Iadies and gentIemen, in the next 50 years,reaIIy, in Iess than 50 years,it's gonna continue to go up.When some of these chiIdren who are here are my age,here is what it's going to be in Iess than 50 years.You've heard of off the charts.Within Iess than 50 years, it'II be here.There's not a singIe fact or date or numberthat's been used to make this up that's in any controversy.The so-caIIed skeptics Iook at this and they say,''So? That seems perfectIy okay.''''So? That seems perfectIy okay.''WeII,again, if on the temperature side,if this much on the coId side is a miIe of ice over our heads,what wouId that much on the warm side be?UItimateIy this is reaIIy not a poIiticaI issueso much as a moraI issue.If we aIIow that to happen,it is deepIy unethicaI.l had such faith in our democratic system,our self-government.l actually thought and believedthat the story would be compelling enough to cause a real sea changein the way the Congress reacted to that issue.l thought they would be startled, too.And they weren't.The struggles,the victories that aren't really victories, the defeats that aren't really defeats. They can serve to magnify the significanceof some trivial step forward,exaggerate the seeming importanceof some massive setback.April 3, 1989.My son pulled loose from my handand chased his friend across the street.He was six years old.The machine was breathing for him.We were possibly going to lose him.He finally took a breath.We stayed in the hospital for a month.lt was almost as ifyou could look at that calendar and just go...And everything just flew off.Seemed trivial, insignificant.He was so brave. He was such...He was such a brave guy.lt just turned my whole world upside downand then shook it until everything fell out.My way of being in the world, it just changed everything for me. How should l spend my time on this Earth?l really dug in,trying to learn about it much more deeply.l went to Antarctica.Went to the South Pole, the North Pole, the Amazon.Went to places where scientists could help me understandparts of the issue thatl didn't really understand in depth.The possibility of losing what was most precious to me.l gained an abilitythat maybe l didn't have before.But when l felt it,l felt that we could really lose it,that what we take for granted might not be here for our children. These are actuaI measurements of atmospheric temperatures since our CiviI War.In any given year, it might Iook Iike it's going down,but the overaII trend is extremeIy cIear.And in recent years,it's uninterrupted and it is intensifying.In fact, if you Iook at the 10 hottest years ever measuredin this atmospheric record,they've aII occurred in the Iast 1 4 years.And the hottest of aII was 2005.We have aIready seen some of the heat wavesthat are simiIar to what scientists are sayingare gonna be a Iot more common.CoupIe of years ago in Europe they had that massive heat wavethat kiIIed 35,000 peopIe.India didn't get as much attention,but the same year the temperature there wentto 122 degrees Fahrenheit.This past summer in the American West,there were a lot of cities that broke all-time records for high temperatures and number of consecutive days with a 100-degree temperature or more. Two hundred cities and towns in the west set all-time records.And in the east there were a lot of cities that did the same thing. IncIuding, incidentaIIy, New OrIeans.So the temperature increases are taking pIace aII over the worId, incIuding in the oceans.This is the naturaI range of variabiIity for temperature in the oceans.You know, peopIe say, ''Oh, it's just naturaI.''It goes up and down, so don't worry about it.''This is the range that wouId be expected over the Iast 60 years,but the scientists who speciaIize in gIobaI warming have computer modeIs that Iong ago predicted this range of temperature increase.Now I'm gonna show you, recentIy reIeased,the actuaI ocean temperatures.And, of course, when the oceans get warmer, that causes stronger storms. We have seen in the Iast coupIe of yearsa Iot of big hurricanes.Hurricane Jeanne and Frances and Ivan were among them.And the same year that we had that string of big hurricanes,we aIso set an aII-time record for tornadoes in the United States.Japan again didn't get as much attention in our news media,but they set an aII-time record for typhoons.Previous record was seven.Here are aII 10 of the ones they had in 2004.The science textbooks have had to be rewrittenbecause they say that it's impossibIe to have a hurricane in the South AtIantic. But the same year the first one ever hit BraziI.Summer of 2005 has been one for the books.The first one was EmiIy that socked into Yucatán.Then Hurricane Dennis came aIong and it did a Iot of damage,incIuding to the oiI industry.This is the Iargest oiI pIatform in the worId after Dennis went through.This one was driven into the bridge at MobiIe.And then, of course, came Katrina.It's worth remembering that when it hit FIorida, it was a Category One.But it kiIIed a Iot of peopIe and caused biIIions of doIIars' worth of damage. And then what happened?Before it hit New OrIeans,it went over warmer waters.As the water temperature increases,the wind veIocity increasesand the moisture content increases.And you'II see Hurricane Katrina form over FIorida.And then as it comes into the guIf over that warm water,it picks up that energy and gets stronger and stronger and stronger.Look at that hurricane's eye.And, of course, the consequences were so horrendous,there are no words to describe it.Yeah, we're getting reports and calls that are just breaking my heart.From people saying, "l've been in my attic. l can't take it anymore."The water is up to my neck. l don't think l can hold out."And that's happening as we speak.We told everybody the importance of the 1 7th Street Canal issue.We said, "Please, please, take care of this."We don't care what you do. Figure it out."Something new for America.But how in God's name could that happen here?There had been warnings that hurricanes wouId get stronger.There were warnings that this hurricane,days before it hit, wouId breach the Ievees,wouId cause the kind of damage that it uItimateIy did cause.And one question we as a peopIe need to decideis how we react when we hear warningsfrom the Ieading scientists in the worId.There was another storm in the 1930s of a different kind.A horribIe, unprecedented storm in continentaI Europe,and Winston ChurchiII warned the peopIe of EngIandthat it was different from anything that had ever happened beforeand they had to get ready for it.And a Iot of peopIe did not want to beIieve it.And he got reaI impatient with aII the dithering.And he said this,Making mistakes in generations and centuries pastwould have consequences that we could overcome.We don't have that luxury anymore.We didn't ask for it,but here it is.Al Gore is the winner of the national popular vote.But the state of Florida, whomever wins there wins the White House. We call Florida, in the Al Gore column...Bulletin: Florida pulled back into the undecided column.George Bush is the president elect of the United States. He is... Florida goes Bush. The presidency is Bush. That's it.And at 2:1 8 this morning, we project...All right, we're officially saying that Florida is too close to call.While l strongly disagree with the court's decision,l accept it.l accept the finality of this outcome....do solemnly swear...l, George Walker Bush, do solemnly swear......that l will faithfully execute the Office of President...Well, that was a hard blow, but...What do you do? You...You make the best of it.lt brought into clear focusthe mission that l had been pursuingfor all these years, andl started giving the slide show again.One often unnoticed effect of global warmingis it causes more precipitation,but more of it coming in one-time big storm events.Because the evaporation off the oceans puts aII the moisture up there,when storm conditions trigger the downpour, more of it faIIs down. The insurance industry has actuaIIy noticed this.Their recovered Iosses are going up.You see the damage from these severe weather events?And 2005 is not even on this yet.When it does, it'II be off that chart.Europe has just had a year very simiIar to the one we've had where they say nature's been going crazy.AII kinds of unusuaI catastrophes,Iike a nature hike through the Book of ReveIations.FIooding in Asia.Mumbai, India this past JuIy.Thirty-seven inches of rain in 24 hours.By far, the Iargest downpourthat any city in India has ever received.Lot of fIooding in China, aIso.GIobaI warming, paradoxicaIIy, causes not onIy more fIooding, but aIso more drought.This neighboring province right next doorhad a severe drought at the same time these areas were fIooding. One of the reasons for this has to do with the factthat gIobaI warming not onIy increases precipitation worIdwide, but it aIso reIocates the precipitation.And focus most of aII on this part of Africajust on the edge of the Sahara.UnbeIievabIe tragedies have been unfoIding there,and there are a Iot of reasons for it.But Darfur and Niger are among those tragedies.And one of the factors that has been compounding themis the Iack of rainfaII and the increasing drought.This is Lake Chad, once one of the Iargest Iakes in the worId.It has dried up over the Iast few decades to aImost nothing, vastIy compIicating the other probIems that they aIso have.The second reasonwhy this is a paradox.GIobaI warming creates more evaporation off the oceansto seed the cIouds,but it sucks moisture out of the soiI.SoiI evaporation increases dramaticaIIywith higher temperatures.And that has consequences for us in the United States, as weII.So this is the Carthage exit.When I was 1 4 years oId, I totaIed the famiIy carright there.Went off that shouIder, turned it over.And see this BIack Angus buII?We raised BIack Angus.My father was named Breeder of the Month.He grew up on a farm.All through his career in the Senatehe continued to come back here and raise cattle.Learning it from your dad on the land,that's really something special.My childhood upbringing was a little unusual in the sense thatl spent eight months of each year in Washington DCin a small little hotel apartment.And then the other four months were spent here on this big, beautiful farm. l had a dog here.l had a pony here.l could shoot my rifle here.l could go swimming in the river here.Go out and lay down in the grass.As a kid, it took me a whileto learn the difference between fun and work.The places where people live were chosenbecause of the climate patternthat has been pretty much the same on Earthsince the end of the last ice age 1 1,000 years ago.Here, on this farm, the patterns are changing.And it seems gradual in the course of a human lifetimebut in the course of time, as defined by this river,it's happening very, very quickly.Two canaries in the coal mine.First one is in the Arctic.This, of course, is the Arctic Ocean, the fIoating ice cap.GreenIand, on its side there.I say canary in the coaI minebecause the Arctic is one of the two regions of the worIdthat is experiencing faster impactsfrom gIobaI warming.This is the Iargest ice sheIf in the Arctic,。
An inconvenient truth难以忽视的真想Al Gore阿尔·戈尔We have the ability to do this. Each one of us is a cause of a global我们有这个能力。
每个人都在引起全球变暖,但我们warming, but each of us can make choices to change that. With the things 可以选择改变这一现状。
对于我们买的we buy, the electricity we use, the cars we drive, we can make our东西、用的电、开的车……我们可以做出选择,choices to bring our individual carbon emissions to zero.将个人排放量降至零。
Ultimately this question comes down to this. Are we, as Americans, 这个问题中将归结于这一点:作为美国公民的我们,capable of doing great things even though they are difficult? Well, the有没有能力去成就大业,即使前方困难重重?record indicates that we do have the capacity. We formed a nation; we过去的一切证明我们有这个能力。
我们建立了一个国家,fought a revolution and brought something new to the Earth, a free我们发起了一场革命,带来了新事物,一个保障自由的国家。
nation guaranteeing individual liberty. We, as Americans, decided that of我们美国人做出了女性应当course women should have the right to vote. We desegregated our享有选举权的决定。
An Essay of An Inconvenience TruthHave you ever imagine that one day the Earth's core begins heating up at an unprecedented and unexpected rate, eventually causing crustal displacement. And all of a sudden the world falls into chaos. Range from Los Angeles sink into the Pacific Ocean, the eruption of the Yellowstone National Park caldera, cataclysmic earthquakes wreaking havoc around the globe, and mega tsunamis surging across the Earth. If you are an Eschatology believer, you would deem the scene is 2012—the doomsday. But for Al Gore, the hero in An Inconvenient Truth, would rather believe that it is the consequence of the global warming.Al Gore, a longtime advocate for the environment and former vice president of the United States, developed a slide show about the threat posed by global warming. Over the last six years, he has presented the show more than 1,000 times around the world. In hopes of reaching a wider audience, Gore joined filmmakers and turned the lecture into a documentary film. The movie, called” An Inconvenient Truth”. And Gore claimed that the environment is in grave danger.In the movie, Al Gore speaks about the major problem with global warming by using data and specific examples to prove his theory. Global warming is when the sun’s rays enter the earth’s atmosphere. Some of the rays are absorbed by the atmosphere as some are reflected back into space. The problem is that pollution hasthickened the earth’s atmosphere therefore more light is absorbed to provide light for the atmosphere therefore less light is reflected and coincidentally, the rays of the sun are heating the earth. Global warming is the increase in average temperature of the Earth’s atmosphere.The problem is that the Earth is heating so much that the ice caps and glaciers are melting, thus the fresh water available to us is declining. Here is an example Gore took in the film. “This is Mt. Kilimanjaro 30 years ago and last year. Within the decade there will be no more snows of Kilimanjaro. The scientific consensus is that we are causing global warming." The movie makes a case for reducing heat-trapping carbon dioxide emissions that have been linked to severe storms, melting ice caps, rising sea levels and the spread of infectious disease.And many scientists say global warming means not just higher temperatures again, but stronger storms, deadlier floods, and higher sea levels. Gore predicted in the film that the floods would silence our planet. "This is what would happen in Florida. [This is what would happen] around Shanghai, home to 40 million people …the area around Calcutta - 60 million," he illustrates. "Here's Manhattan. The World Trade Center Memorial would be under water. Think of the impact of a couple hundred thousand refugees and then imagine 100 million."It is the scene that I described in the beginning. But other scientific studies found exactly the opposite: Greenland's glaciers are growing, notmelting. The Antarctic ice sheet is getting thicker, not thinner. “Did you see any big headlines about that? Why are they trying to scare us?" But Gore says his campaign, and the film, are not about fear-mongering or political agendas. “This is the most crucial challenge that any of us have ever faced, and it's happening in our lifetimes."And in the movie, Gore and filmmaker Davis Guggenheim told what some would consider a most inconvenient truth. "It's like where we were with civil rights. You know, a lot of decent people didn't pay attention to the fact that this was a country that was segregated and had unfair laws and suddenly the point of consciousness shifted and people said, 'Wow, we have to deal with it and we have to get involved.” And I still remember the beginning of the film; because it impresses me most. Gore was carefree to himself: You look at that river gently flowing by. You notice the leaves rustling with the wind. You hear the birds. You hear the tree frogs. In the distance, you hear a cow, you feel the grass. The mud gives a little bit on the river bank. It’s quiet. It’s peaceful. A nd all of a sudden, it's a gear shift inside you. And it's like taking a deep breath and going, "Oh, yeah, l forgot about this." All of these remind me that we are just like the boiling frogs Gore mentioned in the film. We will stay in the water which is becoming hotter and hotter. But we have no consciousness until we die or someone rescue us. It is exactly the situation we have now: the global warming is becoming more and more serious. But in themeantime, we turn a blind eye to it. “Of course we can not. This is the most ridiculous thing we've ever done.” When the last pure land disappears, our generations would say so.One of the wisest men to live on this planet stated that we would suffer our deepest consequences for our actions. This was stated by Winston Churchill who was implying that the ways the people were treating the earth with so much pollution, that we would one day indeed suffer for our actions. At the time many did not listen to his comments, and the few that did were not in accordance with this beliefs. Just like Mark Twain once said: What gets us into trouble is not what we don’t know. It is what we know for sure just aren’t so. And in my opinion, one day we would be confronted with great trouble, if the actions are not taken today to prevent global warming and we still believe that the Earth is so big that we can't possibly have any lasting harmful impact, which purport to be that there is no hope around the corner.At last, I firmly believe that God helps he who helps himself. Our destination is not doomed by anyone but ourselves, not by 2012, not by doomsday. Though Gore said he thought he was failed to get the massage across. From where I stand as long as we keep hammering away at protecting our planet, the only home we have in the universe, can we have a picturesque life in the future.。
An Inconvenient TruthIntroduction“An Inconvenient Truth” is a powerful and thought-provoking documentary that focuses on the issue of climate change. Released in 2006, the film is directed by Davis Guggenheim and features former Vice President Al Gore as the main presenter. Through a combination of scientific data, personal anecdotes, and compelling visuals, Gore presents a compelling argument for the urgent need to address the looming crisis of global warming.Al Gore’s MissionAdvocating for Climate AwarenessAl Gore’s mission in “An Inconvenient Truth” is to r aise awareness about the devastating consequences of climate change. Gore, a passionate advocate for environmental issues, utilizes his expertise and experience to educate viewers about the causes and impacts of global warming. His primary aim is to stimulate dialogue and inspire individuals to take action in their own lives and urge governments to implement environmental policies.The Power of CommunicationGore’s presentation skills are a key aspect of the film’s impact. He effectively utilizes storytelling techniques and employs captivating visuals to convey his message. By breaking down complex scientific concepts into easily understandable terms, Gore reaches a wider audience and makes the film accessible to people from various backgrounds.Climate Change: Causes and EffectsRising TemperaturesOne of the key points discussed in “An Inconvenient Truth” is therapid rise in global temperatures. The film presents scientific evidence, including charts and graphs, to illustrate the escalating trend. As a result of greenhouse gas emissions primarily caused by human activities, the Earth’s average temperature has been steadily increasing over the past century.Melting Ice Caps and Rising Sea LevelsAnother consequence of global warming highlighted in the documentary is the melting of ice caps and subsequent rise in sea levels. Gore emphasizes the vulnerability of coastal communities and the potential displacement of millions of people due to flooding and erosion caused by the melting ice. Alarming images of shrinking glaciers and overwhelmed cities demonstrate the urgency of addressing this issue.Extreme Weather Events“An Inconvenient Truth” also sheds light on the relationship between climate change and extreme weather events. The film explores the increasing frequency and intensity of hurricanes, heatwaves, droughts, and wildfires. By examining scientific research and historical data, Gore establishes a connection between these events and the human-induced changes in the global climate.Ecosystem DisruptionThe documentary delves into the impact of climate change on ecosystems. Gore emphasizes the delicate balance of nature and the devastating consequences of disrupting it. From coral bleaching to species extinction, the film highlights the sobering reality that every living organism is interconnected, and any disruption to the environment hasfar-reaching implications.Taking Action: Solutions and HopeRenewable Energy Sources“An Inconvenient Truth” explores potential solutions to combat climate change. The film advocates for a transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, and geothermal power. Gore presents success stories of countries and communities that have embraced renewable energy and urges viewers to support and invest in clean technology.Individual and Collective ResponsibilityThe documentary emphasizes the importance of individual and collective actions in addressing climate change. Gore suggests small changes individuals can make, such as conserving energy, reducing waste, and making sustainable lifestyle choices. Additionally, he encourages viewers to hold governments and corporations accountable for their environmental impact and to actively support policies that promote sustainability.Education and Awareness“An Inconvenient Truth” underscores the need for education and awareness about climate change. Gore advocates for increased emphasis on environmental education in schools and urges viewers to engage in conversations with family, friends, and colleagues about the issue. He believes that by creating a societal shift in attitudes and priorities, meaningful change can be achieved.Hope for the FutureDespite the grave challenges posed by climate change, the film concludes on a note of hope and optimism. Gore emphasizes that although the situation is dire, collective action and political will can make a significant difference. He showcases examples of positive change and encourages viewers to be part of the solution, reminding them that addressing climate change is not just an inconvenient truth but an essential responsibility for the wellbeing of future generations.Conclusion“An Inconvenient Truth” serves as a wake-up call regarding the urgent need to address climate change. Through compelling storytelling, Al Gore effectively communicates the causes and effects of global warming, as well as potential solutions. The documentary emphasizes the importance of individual action, collective responsibility, education, and hope. It challenges viewers to confront the inconvenient truth and take meaningful steps towards a more sustainable future.。
难以忽视的真相AnInconvenientTruth英文影评第一篇:难以忽视的真相 An Inconvenient Truth 英文影评难以忽视的真相An Inconvenient Truth 英文影评review by James Berardinelli The problem with An Inconvenient Truth isn't the message;it's the messenger.If the film's goal is to educate and warn about Global Warming, why use one of the most divisive political figures of the last decade as the spokesman? I don't have a problem with Al Gore, but how many Republicans(and possibly even Independents)are going to be interested in spending 100 minutes listening to the ex-Vice President talking about Global Warming? Thus, instead of a wake-up call, this filmturns into a sermon for the choir.The documentary makes two additional missteps that hurt its credibility and will diminish its widespread acceptance.There are times when, via biographical snippets and personal reflections from its central figure, it seems to be more about Gore than Global Warming.And, despite what others have written, there is a clear, albeit subtle, political bias.When the film wants to illustrate the obtuseness of politicians concerning Global Warming, it uses sound bytes from several prominent mendirector Davis Guggenheim has a right to slant his film any way he wants todon't worry, Al Gore don't pretend he's on American Idol), since it's essentially a filmed version of one of Gore's well-known Global Warming slideshows.For about 90 minutes of the 100-minute running time, Gore talks to us(he doesn't lecture)about the subject, using a variety of slides(and even an animated cartoon)to make his point.It should be no surprise that the presentation is as polished as it is-Gore estimates he has given it more than 1000 times over a span of more than 20 years.Despite its flaws and the familiarity of thematerial, I was engaged by the movie.The clarity and simplicity of the presentation is remarkable.Gore is a likable, confident, humorous speaker.And the material reminds us of the need for vigilance.If only a few viewers learn some things about Global Warming, then the movie has done a worthy job.However?Critics are constantly reminded to review the movie that exists, not the one that doesn't, but in the case of An Inconvenient Truth, the message is so important that I can't help but wonder if this doesn't constitute, on some level, a missed opportunity.Critics have labeled Al Gore and his decades-long crusade to curb global warming as “alarmist.” But i f you've been warning people that the sky is falling for more than 20 years and it really is falling(or at least heating up), don't you have an obligation to sound an alarm? The highly persuasive documentary “An Inconvenient Truth” captures Gore delivering a multimedia presentation he has given an estimated 1,000 times since 1989.The talk is augmented with an impressive array of graphs, animation, anecdotes and statistics that convey a flurry of facts, projections and conjecture, all pointing to the ill effects the present rate of emissions has on the environment.A film with a clear point of view(and little room for others), it is the inspiration of producers Laurie David and Lawrence Bender, who attended Gore's lecture, decided it had to be made into a film to broaden the reach of its message and recruited director Davis Guggenheim to shoot it.Guggenheim intercuts the lecture with footage of Gore on the road, studiously working out his presentation on his ubiquitous laptop, and segments that effectively show the crucible moments in his life that led him to continually rededicate himself to this topic.There's the college professor who first taught him about climate change in the late1960s, the death of Gore's sister Nancy from cancer and the 1989 accident that nearly claimed the life of his son.While the vignettes establish Gore's long-term commitment, unfortunately there's a slickness to them that plays like a campaign film that might be shown at a political convention.Gore might not be anybody's idea of a pitchman, but here he's matched with the right topic, one for which he demonstrates real passion.He's charming, intelligent, professorial and one might even say … presidential.In fact, more than one observer has commented that if this Al Gore had been more visible during the 2000 election there may have been a different outcome.Rather than alarmed, Gore comes off as poised, relaxed and confident.Guggenheim sets up Citizen Al as part rock star, part eco-Buddha.He introduces himself to a small audience saying, “I'm Al Gore, and I used to be the next president of the United States.” The line gets a laugh and quickly addresses the considerable baggage that comes with being on the losing end of one of the most divisive political outcomes in U.S.history.This position has its pros and cons for the film.On the plus side, Gore stands tall as an insider pushed to the fringe, a man on a mission with nothing to lose.He's able to attack the issue without equivocation.On the minus side, it's easy for naysayers to claim that the digs he makes at conservatives are sour grapes and he's merely positioning himself to run again in 2008 —though this would appear to be a longshot issue on which to do so.The environment has not resonated much with voters or politicians in the past, though the increasing popularity of hybrid cars and eco-friendly products and services might indicate a shift in attitudes.That something so important could be largely ignored for so long is almost inconceivable, and among the things the film does well is an analysis as to why thatis.A 2004 Science magazine survey of more than 900 peer-reviewed academic papers on the subject of global warming found that all supported the reality while none contested it.However, a like sampling of mainstream media found that 53% of the stories portrayed global warming as something that was in doubt in the scientific community.The mixed message has kept the automobile and oil industries in the driver's seat and the issue out of political debates.Gore also does an excellent job of explaining the basic science behind climate change and the accelerated rise in temperatures since the 1970s.What could be very dry material is enlivened by Gore's geniality and desire to share the information.The potential for dreaded heaviosity is leavened at times by his dry wit and humorous moments, such as a clip from Matt Groening's animated series “Futurama.” Real and projected catastrophes reveal what is at stake.Glacier erosion, the threat to wildlife and the spread of deadly viruses make for some terrifying scenarios.Hurricane Katrina and other weather-related disasters that occurred in late 2005 are included, giving the film a sense of timeliness and a powerful visual element, which Gore compares to “a nature hike through the Book of Revelation s.” The other strong point that Gore makes is to dispute the “either/or” argument presented by big business when it comes to making the necessary changes.He uses Upton Sinclair's quote, “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it,” to not-so-subtly stress the motivation behind this line of thinking.The film's title refers to politicians' apprehensiveness in addressing the problem.Attempts at strict environmental reform have long been met with gloomy projections from the right of economic disaster in the form of lost jobs and factory closures,and Gore rebuts this by suggesting that green business can be good business.Although the message of the film sounds bleak, it is actually quite rousing.Gore offers measures that can be taken on personal and community levels but also stresses that major changes require a larger response.The film's ultimate significance is that this requires political will —which Gore labels a “renewable resource” — and that if our present representatives are not up to the challenge, we elect men and women who are.I want to write this review so every reader will begin it and finish it.I am a liberal, but I do not intend this as a review reflecting any kind of politics.It reflects the truth as I understand it, and it represents, I believe, agreement among the world's experts.Global warming is real.It is caused by human activity.Mankind and its governments must begin immediate action to halt and reverse it.If we do nothing, in about 10 years the planet may reach a “tipping point” and begin a slide toward destruction of our civilization and most of the other species on this planet.After that point is reached, it would be too late for any action.These facts are stated by Al Gore in the documentary “An Inconvenient Truth.” Forget he ever ran for office.Consider him a concerned man speaking out on the approaching crisis.“There is no controversy about these facts,” he says in the film.“Out of 925 recent articles in peer-review scientific journals about global warming, there was no disagreement.Zero.” He stands on a stage before a vast screen, in front of an audience.The documentary is based on a speech he has been developing for six years, and is supported by dramatic visuals.He shows th e famous photograph “Earthrise,” taken from space by the first American astronauts.Then he shows a series of later space photographs, clearly indicating that glaciersand lakes are shrinking, snows are melting, shorelines are retreating.He provides statistics: The 10 warmest years in history were in the last 14 st year South America experienced its first hurricane.Japan and the Pacific are setting records for typhoons.Hurricane Katrina passed over Florida, doubled back over the Gulf, picked up strength from unusually warm Gulf waters, and went from Category 3 to Category 5.There are changes in the Gulf Stream and the jet stream.Cores of polar ice show that carbon dioxide is much, much higher than ever before in a quarter of a million years.It was once thought that such things went in cycles.Gore stands in front of a graph showing the ups and downs of carbon dioxide over the centuries.Yes, there is a cyclical pattern.Then, in recent years, the graph turns up and keeps going up, higher and higher, off the chart.The primary man-made cause of global warming is the burning of fossil fuels.We are taking energy stored over hundreds of millions of years in the form of coal, gas and oil, and releasing it suddenly.This causes global warming, and there is a pass-along effect.Since glaciers and snow reflect sunlight but sea water absorbs it, the more the ice melts, the more of the sun's energy is retained by the sea.Gore says that although there is “100 percent agreement” among scientists, a database search of newspaper and magazine articles shows that 57 percent question the fact of global warming, while 43 percent support it.These figures are the result, he says, of a disinformation campaign started in the 1990s by the energy industries to “reposition global warmi ng as a debate.” It is the same strategy used for years by the defenders of tobacco.My father was a Luckys smoker who died of lung cancer in 1960, and 20 years later it was still “debatable” that there was a link between smoking and lungcancer.Now we are talking about the death of the future, starting in the lives of those now living.“The world won't 'end' overnight in 10 years,” Gore says.“But a point will have been passed, and there will be an irreversible slide into destruction.” In England, Sir James Lovelock, the scientist who proposed the Gaia hypothesis(that the planet functions like a living organism), has published a new book saying that in 100 years mankind will be reduced to “a few breeding couples at the Poles.” Gore thinks “that's too pessimist ic.We can turn this around just as we reversed the hole in the ozone layer.But it takes action right now, and politicians in every nation must have the courage to do what is necessary.It is not a political issue.It is a moral issue.” When I said I was goin g to a press screening of “An Inconvenient Truth,”a friend said, “Al Gore talking about the environment!Bor...ing!” This is not a boring film.The director, Davis Guggenheim, uses words, images and Gore's concise litany of facts to build a film that is fascinating and relentless.In 39 years, I have never written these words in a movie review, but here they are: You owe it to yourself to see this film.If you do not, and you have grandchildren, you should explain to them why you decided not to.Am I acting as an advocate in this review? Yes, I am.I believe that to be “impartial” and “balanced” on global warming means one must take a position like Gore's.There is no other view that can be defended.Sen.James Inhofe(R-Okla.), chairman of the Senate Environment Com mittee, has said, “Global warming is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people.” I hope he takes his job seriously enough to see this film.I think he has a responsibility to do that.What can we do? Switch to and encourage the development of alternative energy sources: Solar, wind, tidal, and, yes, nuclear.Move quickly toward hybrid andelectric cars.Pour money into public transit, and subsidize the fares.Save energy in our houses.I did a funny thing when I came home after seeing “An Inconvenient Truth.” I went around the house turning off the lights.You can say whatever you like about the politics of former Senator and Vice President Al Gore, and you can even be skeptical about his message as delivered in his documentary about global warming, An Inconvenient Truth, but at the very least, he does make a compelling case for anyone that watches it to find out more about the situation.While most Liberal viewers out there will believe everything Gore says chapter and verse, and Conservatives will no doubt dismiss it as more misguided, tree-hugging scare tactics, if you keep an open mind to the presentation as delivered, it's almost impossible not to feel that self-education regarding the global warming issue has become an immediate concern that merits thorough investigation before dismissing as “Chicken Little” nonsense.The strength of the documentary's impetus comes from the affability and mild-mannered approach by the main presenter of its information.The main weakness of it is that that person is Al Gore.It's not because Al Gore isn't an eloquent speaker and respectable leader worthy of presenting such volatile, and potentially cataclysmic, information--as a famous politician that has been on the forefront of the environmental movement, there are few other recognizable names that could have even gotten this film made.The fact is that Gore's presence has the double-edged quality that will galvanize the political base that firmly believes in the environmental movement while keeping those that should rightfully hear the information, namely, closed-minded Conservatives, completely at bay.Most staunch Conservatives will refuse to believe anything Gore has to say onthe matter, regardless of how many facts he is able to back up, probably dismissing every learned scientist, scholarly journal, and news article as more evidence of a Liberal political agenda that seeks to take away prime and lucrative industries in the world that employ millions of hard-working people.Ironic that the same people that see every syllable uttered by Gore as tainted lies will take everything said by provocateurs like Rush Limbaugh as gospel, without the need for scientific evidence to support his theories to label them as indubitable truth.Another double-edged quality to the film lies in the amount of personal information about Al Gore that director Guggenheim deemed necessary to include.Within the construct of the slide presentation, we are taken outside of it to learn several anecdotes about Gore's upbringing and tidbits regarding the most interesting facets of his life.The intended effect is to make Gore seem more trustworthy and likeable, and therefore, not some empty suit lobbyist or wacko with a crazy agenda.While it is successful on this front, there are moments when you begin to wonder if the film isn't driven by the need to compel us into more environmentally friendly pursuits than in the redemption of Al Gore as a person and political entity ruined by the divisive election of 2000.However, on the other hand, Gore actually does manage to tie in this anecdotal material into the overall message, even if only tangentially, so credit them for trying to take a more personal, emotionally resonant, and friendly approach, while still sticking to theme.An Inconvenient Truth may not be the most exciting film released in the Summer of 2006, but it is probably the most important, especially for those that don't want to believe such a dire situation exists.You may not have voted for Gore, and you may not even like him personally;listen to themessage, if not the messenger, and then do your own studies on the situation from actual scientific sources--not radio personality political pundits with knee-jerk claims of “Chicken Little” like boys who cry wolf.Removing my own personal and political beliefs and just taking this as a film, it is effectively presented and fascinating in its information, even if somewhat dry at times for those not accustomed to listening to what amounts to be a lecture, albeit a flashy one.Perhaps having excerpts of interviews with actual scientific scholars and leaders would have been a better way to strengthen Gore's claims than showing his boyhood home and family, but Gore's message still is able to get out there, and possibly affect thousands of people and the way they think--perhaps even millions once it hits video and TV, An Inconvenient Truth may have shortcomings in certain respects, and it may not alter the course of the world as it intends, but it just might change your life, and for that alone, it deserves to be called one of the most powerful and important films of 2006.第二篇:难以忽视的真相︽难以忽视的真相︾观后感院系:化学与环境科学学院班级:环境131 学号:20***5 姓名:高秉婷日期:2014.4.28《难以忽视的真相》观后感《难以忽视的真相》是一部纪录片,令我感触很深的电影,它是美国前副总统阿尔·戈尔主演的,当我看到他深情的演说,把全球变暖描述的如此的淋漓尽致,其中揭露了气候变迁的资料并对此做出预测,同时也在电影中穿插了高尔的个人活动。
an inconvenient truth观后感
《An Inconvenient Truth》是一部由前美国副总统阿尔·戈尔制作的纪录片,它揭示了全球变暖的真相和影响。
这部电影让我深刻地认识到了全球变暖的严重性和紧迫性,同时也让我意识到我们每个人都应该为保护地球做出自己的努力。
在这部电影中,阿尔·戈尔通过一系列的数据和图表,向观众展示了全球变暖的现状和趋势。
他指出,由于人类活动导致的二氧化碳排放量不断增加,地球的温度正在不断上升,这将导致海平面上升、极端天气事件增多、生态系统崩溃等一系列严重后果。
这些后果不仅会给人类带来巨大的经济损失,更会对人类的生存和发展造成极大的威胁。
在电影中,阿尔·戈尔还介绍了一些全球变暖的解决方案。
他提出,我们应该采取一系列措施来减少二氧化碳排放量,包括使用清洁能源、改善能源效率、推广低碳生活方式等。
他还呼吁政府、企业和个人都应该为保护地球做出自己的努力,共同应对全球变暖的挑战。
通过观看这部电影,我深刻地认识到了全球变暖的严重性和紧迫性。
我们每个人都应该为保护地球做出自己的努力,从自身做起,从小事做起,采取一系列措施来减少二氧化碳排放量,推广低碳生活方式,共同应对全球变暖的挑战。
总之,这部电影让我深刻地认识到了全球变暖的严重性和紧迫性,同时也让我意识到我们每个人都应该为保护地球做出自己的努力。
我相信,只要我们共同努力,采取一系列措施来减少二氧化碳排放量,推广低碳生活方式,就一定能够应对全球变暖的挑战,让地球变得更加美好。
难以忽视的真相读后感《难以忽视的真相》(An Inconvenient Truth)是一部由戴维斯·古根海姆(Davis Guggenheim)执导的纪录片,讲述了前美国副总统阿尔·戈尔(Al Gore)关于全球气候变化的故事。
这部影片不仅展示了戈尔在气候变化问题上的努力和成就,还向观众传达了气候变化的严峻性和紧迫性。
以下是一些关于《难以忽视的真相》的读后感。
1.深刻的启示:《难以忽视的真相》不仅仅是一部纪录片,它是一次心灵的震撼,让我意识到每个人都应为气候变化负责。
2.紧迫的行动:影片中展示的科学研究数据和事实让我深感不安,我们不能再对气候变化视而不见,必须采取行动。
3.个人与集体的责任:戈尔的故事提醒我,每个人都可以在自己的生活中做出改变,减少碳足迹,共同应对气候变化。
4.教育与倡导:这部影片是对公众的一次极好的教育,它激发了我去了解更多关于气候变化的知识,并鼓励我去倡导可持续的生活方式。
5.希望与挑战:虽然影片中揭示了气候变化的严峻挑战,但它也传递了希望的信息,即只要我们采取行动,就还有机会改变未来。
6.政策与行动:影片让我认识到,我们需要有远见的政策和领导力来解决气候变化问题,我期待看到更多政府和企业的积极行动。
7.个人行动的鼓励:《难以忽视的真相》鼓励我在日常生活中做出选择,比如减少使用一次性塑料,选择可再生能源,这些小小的改变汇集起来可以产生巨大的影响。
8.对未来的思考:影片让我深刻思考我们留给下一代的世界会是什么样子,我希望能够为他们创造一个更加可持续和健康的未来。
这些读后感反映了《难以忽视的真相》对观众产生的深远影响,它不仅提高了人们对气候变化的认识,也激发了人们采取行动的愿望。
这部影片是一部强有力的倡导作品,它呼吁全球团结起来,共同应对气候变化的挑战。
被指控欺骗的英语作文下载温馨提示:该文档是我店铺精心编制而成,希望大家下载以后,能够帮助大家解决实际的问题。
文档下载后可定制随意修改,请根据实际需要进行相应的调整和使用,谢谢!并且,本店铺为大家提供各种各样类型的实用资料,如教育随笔、日记赏析、句子摘抄、古诗大全、经典美文、话题作文、工作总结、词语解析、文案摘录、其他资料等等,如想了解不同资料格式和写法,敬请关注!Download tips: This document is carefully compiled by theeditor. I hope that after you download them,they can help yousolve practical problems. The document can be customized andmodified after downloading,please adjust and use it according toactual needs, thank you!In addition, our shop provides you with various types ofpractical materials,such as educational essays, diaryappreciation,sentence excerpts,ancient poems,classic articles,topic composition,work summary,word parsing,copyexcerpts,other materials and so on,want to know different data formats andwriting methods,please pay attention!I can't believe I'm being accused of deception. Itfeels like a punch in the gut, a betrayal of trust. How did it come to this? Let me explain.I remember the first time I met him, the accuser. We were at a party, surrounded by laughter and music. He seemed like a genuine person, someone I could trust. Little did I know that this encounter would lead to such a predicament.Months passed, and our friendship grew. We shared secrets, dreams, and even our deepest fears. It felt like we were kindred spirits, destined to be lifelong friends. But then, things started to change.One day, he came to me with a business proposition. He wanted me to invest in his new venture, promising high returns and guaranteed success. I was hesitant at first, but his persuasive words and unwavering confidenceconvinced me otherwise.I invested a significant amount of money, hoping for the best. But as time went on, it became clear that his promises were nothing but empty words. The venture failed, and I lost everything I had invested. I felt deceived, betrayed by someone I considered a close friend.But instead of acknowledging his own mistakes, he turned the blame on me. He accused me of being the mastermind behind the failed venture, claiming that I had manipulated him into investing. It was a shocking revelation, a complete distortion of the truth.I tried to defend myself, presenting evidence and witnesses to support my innocence. But he was relentless, spreading false rumors and tarnishing my reputation. It felt like a never-ending battle, a fight against a force determined to destroy me.Throughout this ordeal, I have learned the importance of trust and discernment. It's easy to be swayed bycharismatic individuals, but it's crucial to question their intentions and evaluate their credibility. I have also realized the power of resilience and perseverance in the face of adversity.Being accused of deception has been a painful experience, one that has left scars on my heart and soul. But I refuse to let it define me. I will continue to fight for justice and rebuild my life, knowing that the truthwill eventually prevail.So, as I stand here today, facing the accusations that have been unjustly thrown at me, I hold my head high. I am not a deceiver, but a victim of circumstances. And I will not let this define who I am.。
关于解释骗局的英语作文Uncovering the Truth: A Deeper Look into DeceptionDeception is a prevalent phenomenon in our modern society, permeating various aspects of our lives, from personal relationships to the global marketplace. It is a complex issue that warrants careful examination, as it can have profound consequences on individuals, communities, and even entire nations. In this essay, we will delve into the nature of deception, explore its underlying causes, and discuss the importance of recognizing and addressing this phenomenon.At the core of deception lies the intentional misrepresentation of information or the concealment of the truth. Individuals, organizations, or even governments may engage in deceptive practices for a variety of reasons, such as personal gain, power, or the desire to manipulate the perceptions of others. The motives behind deception can be as diverse as the forms it takes, ranging from white lies told to spare someone's feelings to elaborate schemes designed to exploit vulnerable populations.One of the primary drivers of deception is the pursuit of self-interest. Individuals may lie or withhold information to protect their ownreputation, avoid consequences, or gain an advantage over others. In the business world, companies may engage in fraudulent practices, such as false advertising or financial misrepresentation, in order to increase profits and maintain a competitive edge. Similarly, politicians and public figures may resort to deception to maintain their power or sway public opinion in their favor.Another factor contributing to the prevalence of deception is the human tendency to rationalize and justify our actions. When faced with the temptation to deceive, individuals often employ cognitive biases and moral disengagement strategies to convince themselves that their actions are justified or even necessary. This self-deception can lead to a spiral of dishonesty, where the perpetrator becomes increasingly desensitized to the ethical implications of their actions.The consequences of deception can be far-reaching and devastating. On a personal level, the betrayal of trust can damage relationships, erode self-esteem, and lead to emotional turmoil. In the broader societal context, deception can undermine the foundations of institutions, erode public confidence, and contribute to a climate of mistrust and skepticism.Moreover, the proliferation of digital technologies and social media has amplified the potential for deception, as the ease of disseminating information and the ability to create false narrativeshave increased exponentially. The spread of misinformation and "fake news" has become a global concern, with far-reaching implications for democratic processes, public health, and social cohesion.In order to address the challenge of deception, it is crucial to cultivate a culture of transparency, accountability, and ethical decision-making. This requires a multifaceted approach that involves education, critical thinking, and the strengthening of institutions and social safeguards.At the individual level, developing critical thinking skills and media literacy can help people recognize and resist deceptive practices. Encouraging self-awareness and the ability to question one's own biases and assumptions can also be an important step in combating deception.On an institutional level, the implementation of robust ethical guidelines, whistleblower protections, and effective oversight mechanisms can help deter and expose deceptive practices. Governments, businesses, and other organizations must demonstrate a strong commitment to integrity and transparency, setting the tone for the broader societal discourse.Furthermore, the media and educational systems have a crucial roleto play in promoting the values of truth, honesty, and ethical conduct. By fostering a culture of fact-checking, investigative journalism, and critical analysis, we can empower individuals to navigate the complex landscape of information and make informed decisions.In conclusion, the issue of deception is a multifaceted and pervasive challenge that requires a comprehensive and collaborative approach. By understanding the underlying drivers of deception, cultivating a culture of transparency and accountability, and equipping individuals with the necessary tools to recognize and resist deceptive practices, we can work towards a society that values truth, integrity, and the well-being of all its members. Only through such concerted efforts can we hope to uncover the truth and build a more just and trustworthy world.。
2009年格莱美获奖名单年度最佳唱片:《Please Read The Letter》Robert Plant &A lison Krauss年度最佳专辑:《Raising Sand》Robert Plant &Alison Krau ss年度最佳歌曲:Coldplay《Viva La Vida》Guy Berryman, Jon ny Buckland, Will Champion &Chris Martin, songwriters 最佳新人:Adele最佳流行男歌手:John Mayer最佳流行女歌手:Adele最佳流行乐队/组合:coldplay《Viva la vida》最佳流行合唱:Robert Plant &Alicon《Rich Woman》最佳流行器乐演奏:Eagles 《I Dreamed There Was No War》最佳流行乐器演奏专辑: Bela Flack《Gingle all the way》最佳流行演唱专辑:Duffy《Rockferry》最佳传统流行演唱专辑:Natalie Cole《Still Unforgettable》最佳舞曲唱片:Daft Punk 《Harder Better Faster Stronger》最佳电子/舞曲专辑:Daft Punk《Alive 2007》最佳摇滚歌手: Johne Mayer《Gravity》最佳摇滚乐队/组合:Kings of Lion 《Sex on fire》最佳硬摇滚演奏:The Mars Volta《Wax Simulacra》最佳金属演奏: Metallica《My Apocalyse》最佳摇滚乐器演奏:Zappa Plays Zappa &Steve Vai &Napoleo n Murphy Brock《Peaches En Regalia》最佳摇滚歌曲:Bruce Springsteen《Summer Cloth》最佳摇滚专辑:《Viva La Vida》Coldplay最佳另类音乐专辑:Radiohead《in rainbows》最佳女R&B歌手:Alicia Keys《Superwoman》最佳R&B男歌手:Ne-Yo《Miss Independent》最佳R&B乐队/组合:Al Green &John Legend《Stay with me》最佳传统R&B歌手:Al Green Featuring Anthony Hamilton《Y ou‘ve Got The Love I Need》最佳城市音乐/另类歌手:Chrisette Michele &will.i.am《Be ok》最佳R&B歌曲:Mikkel S. Eriksen, T.E. Hermansen &S. Smi th《Miss Independent》最佳R&B专辑:《Jennifer Hudson》Jennifer Hudson最佳当代R&B专辑:Mary J.Blige《Growing Pains》最佳说唱歌手:Lill Wayne《a milli》最佳说唱乐队/组合:Jay-Z &T.I《Swagga Like Us》最佳说唱歌曲合作:Estelle &kanye west《美国男孩》最佳说唱歌曲:Lil Wayne &Static Major《Lollipop》最佳说唱专辑: Lil Wayne《Tha Carter III》最佳乡村女歌手: Carrie Underwood《Last Name》最佳乡村男歌手: Brad Paisley《Letter To Me》最佳乡村乐队/组合:《Stay》Sugarland最佳乡村合唱: Robert Plant &Alison Krauss《Killing The Blues》最佳乡村乐器演奏:《Cluster Pluck》Brad Paisley, James Burton, Vince Gill, John Jorgenson, Albert Lee, Brent M ason, Redd Volkaert &Steve Wariner最佳乡村歌曲: Jennifer Nadles《Stay》最佳乡村专辑: George Strait《Trabador》最佳兰草专辑:《Honoring The Fathers Of Bluegrass: Trib ute To 1946 And 1947》Ricky Skaggs &Kentucky Thunder 最佳新世纪专辑:《Peace Time》Jack DeJohnette最佳当代爵士乐专辑:《Randy In Brasil》Randy Brecker 最佳爵士演唱专辑:《Loverly》Cassandra Wilson最佳爵士乐器独奏:《Be-Bop》Terence Blanchard, soloist 最佳爵士演奏专辑:《The New Crystal Silence》Chick Cor ea &Gary Burton最佳大爵士乐团专辑:《Monday Night Live At The Village Vanguard》The Vanguard Jazz Orchestra最佳拉丁爵士专辑:《Song For Chico》Arturo O‘Farrill & The Afro-Latin Jazz Orchestra最佳灵乐表演:Mary Mary《Get Up》最佳灵乐歌曲:《Help Me Believe》Kirk Franklin, songwri ter (Kirk Franklin)最佳摇滚/说唱灵乐专辑:《Alive And Transported》TobyMac 最佳流行/当代灵乐专辑:《Thy Kingdom Come》CeCe Winans 最佳南方、乡村或蓝草灵乐专辑:《Lovin‘ Life》Gaither V ocal Band最佳传统灵乐专辑:《Down In New Orleans》The Blind Boys Of Alabama最佳当代节奏蓝调灵乐专辑:《The Fight Of My Life》Kirk Franklin最佳流行拉丁专辑:《La Vida...Es Un Ratico》Juanes最佳拉丁摇滚/另类或城市音乐专辑:《45》Jaguares最佳拉丁城市专辑:《Los Extraterrestres》Wisin y Yandel 最佳热带拉丁专辑:《Seor Bachata》José Feliciano最佳墨西哥/墨西哥-美洲专辑:《Amor, Dolor Y Lágrimas: M úsica Ranchera》《Canciones De Amor》Mariachi Divas最佳特加诺专辑:《Viva La Revolucion》Ruben Ramos &The Mexican Revolution最佳诺特诺专辑:《Raíces》Los Tigres Del Norte最佳Banda专辑:《No Es De Madera》Joan Sebástian最佳传统蓝调专辑:《One Kind Favor》B.B.King最佳当代蓝调专辑:《City That Care Forgot》Dr. John An d The Lower 911最佳传统民谣专辑:《BringMeHome》Peggy Seeger最佳当代民谣/美国本土专辑:《Raising Sand》Robert Plant &Alison Krauss最佳印第安音乐专辑:《Come To Me Great Mystery —Native American Healing Songs》Tom Wasinger, producer最佳夏威夷音乐专辑:《‘Ikena》Tia Carrere &Daniel Ho 最佳柴迪科舞曲/Cajun音乐专辑:《Live at the 2008 New Or leans Jazz &Heritage Festival》BeauSoleil &Michael Douc et最佳雷鬼专辑:《Jah Is Real》Burning Spear最佳传统世界音乐专辑:《Ilembe: Honoring Shaka Zulu》La dysmith Black Mambazo最佳当代世界音乐专辑:《Global Drum Project》Mickey H art, Zakir Hussain, Sikiru Adepoju &Giovanni Hidalgo 最佳波尔卡专辑:《Let The Whole World Sing》Jimmy Sturr And His Orchestra最佳儿童音乐剧专辑:《Here Come The 123s》They Might Be Giants最佳儿童朗读专辑:《Yes To Running! Bill Harley Live》Bill Harley最佳诵读专辑:《An Inconvenient Truth (Al Gore)》Beau B ridges, Cynthia Nixon &Blair Underwood最佳喜剧专辑:《It‘s Bad For Ya》George Carlin最佳音乐剧专辑:《In The Heights》最佳改编影视音乐专辑:《Juno》最佳原创影视音乐专辑:《The Dark Knight》James Newton H oward &Hans Zimmer, composers最佳影视歌曲:电影《Wall-E》中的歌曲《DownToEarth》最佳器乐作曲:《The Adventures Of Mutt (From Indiana Jo nes And The Kingdom Of The Crystal Skull)》John William s, composer (John Williams)最佳器乐编曲:《Define Dancing (From Wall-E)》Peter Gab riel &Thomas Newman最佳器乐编曲伴唱:《Here‘s That Rainy Day》Nan Schwart z, arranger (Natalie Cole)最佳唱片包装:《Death Magnetic》(Metallica) Bruce Duck worth, Sarah Moffat &David Turner, art directors最佳盒装/限量发行版包装:《In Rainbows》(Radiohead) S tanley Donwood, Mel Maxwell &Christiaan Munro, art dire ctors最佳专辑注解:《An inconvienient Truth》最佳历史专辑:《Art Of Field Recording Volume I: FiftyYears Of Traditional》最佳非古典类工程专辑:《Consolers Of The Lonely》(The R aconteurs)Joe Chiccarelli, Vance Powell &Jack White III, engineers年度最佳非古典类制作人:Rick RubinDeath Magnetic (Metallica)Home Before Dar k (Neil Diamond)Mercy (Dancing For The Death Of An Imaginary Enemy)Seeing Things (Jakob Dylan)Weezer (Red Alb um) (Weezer)最佳非古典类混音唱片:《Electric Feel (Justice Remix)》J ustice, remixers (MGMT)最佳环绕音响专辑:《Mussorgsky: Pictures At An Exhibiti on; Night On Bald Mountain; Prelude To Khovanshchina》最佳古典类工程专辑:《Traditions And Transformations: S ounds Of Silk Road Chicago》年度最佳古典类制作人:David FrostBerlioz: Symphonie Fantastique (Gustavo Dudamel &Los Angeles Philharmonic)Right Through The B one —Julius Rntgen Chamber Music (ARC Ensemble)Schubert: Sonata In D Maj.; Liszt: Don Juan Fantasy (Min Kwon)Traditions And Tran sformations: Sounds Of Silk Road Chicago (Miguel Harth-Bedoya, Alan Gilbert, Yo-Y o Ma, Silk Road E nsemble, Wu Man &Chicago Symphony Orchestra)最佳古典专辑:《Weill: Rise And Fall Of The City Of Mah agonny》James Conlon最佳管弦乐队:《Shostakovich: Symphony No. 4》Bernard H aitink最佳歌剧唱片:《Weill: Rise And Fall Of The City Of Mah agonny》James Conlon最佳合唱团:《Symphony Of Psalms》Sir Simon Rattle最佳器乐独奏(与管弦乐队合作):《Schoenberg/Sibelius: Vi olin Concertos》Esa-Pekka Salonen最佳器乐独奏(无管弦乐队) :《Piano Music Of Salonen, St ucky, And Lutoslawski》Gloria Cheng(陈克兰)最佳室内音乐演奏:《Carter, Elliott: String Quartets N os. 1 And 5》Pacifica Quartet最佳小乐队演奏奖:《Spotless Rose: Hymns To The Virgin Mary》Charles Bruffy, conductor; Phoenix Chorale最佳古典演唱:《Corigliano: Mr. Tambourine Man: Seven P oems Of Bob Dylan》Hila Plitmann最佳当代古典音乐作曲奖:《Mr. Tambourine Man: Seven Poe ms Of Bob Dylan》John Corigliano (JoAnn Falletta)最佳古典跨界专辑:《Simple Gifts》The King‘s Singers 最佳短篇音乐录影带:《Pork And Beans》Weezer最佳长篇音乐录影带:《Runnin‘ Down A Dream》Tom Petty &The Heartbreakers。
An inconvenient truth
第一段
We have the ability to do this.(我们有这个能力)
Each one of us is a cause of global warming,but each of us can make choices to change that.(每个人都在引起地球变暖,但我们可以选择改变这一现状)
With the thing we buy,the electricity we use,the cars we drive,we can make choices to bring our individual carbon emissions to zero.(对于我们买的东西、用的电、开的车......我们可以作出选择,将个人排碳量降至零)
第二段
Ultimately this question comes down to this.(这个问题终将归结于一点)
Are we,as Americans,capable of doing great things even though they are difficult?(作为美国公民的我们,有没有能力去成就大业,即使前方困难重重?)
第三段
Well,the record indicates that we do have that capacity.(过去的一切证明我们有这个能力)
We formed a nation; (我们建立了一个国家)
We fought a revolution and brought something new to this Earth,a free nation guaranteeing individual liberty.(我们发起了一场革命,带来了新事物,一个保障个人自由的国家)
We,as Americans,decided that of course women should have the right to vote.(我们美国人做出了女性应当享有选举权的决定)
We desegregated our schools.(我们终结了学校里的种族隔离制度)
We landed on the moon,the very example of what's possible when we are at our best.(我们登上了月球,这最好的证明了只要我们齐心,就没有什么不可能)
We have even solved a global environmental crisis before,the hole in the stratospheric ozone layer.(我们甚至曾经成功解决了一大环境危机—臭氧层空间)
This was said to be an impossible problem to solve because it's a global environmental challenge requiring cooperation from every nation in the world.(这曾被称为是不可能解决的问题,因为它是全球性的环境问题,需要全世界所有国家联手合作)But we took it on.(但是我们成功了)
So now we have to use our political processes in our democracy,and then decide to act together to solve those problems.(因此,现在我们必须在民主体制内通过政治手段,来作出决定齐心协力解决这些问题)
But we have to have a different perspective on this one.(但是我们必须用全新的视角来看待这一危机)
It's different from any problem we have ever faced before.(它绝不同于我们以前遭遇的任何难题)
第五段
It's our only home.(这是我们唯一的家园)
And that is what is at stake,our ability to live on planet Earth,to have a future as a civilization.(如今它面临危机,危及到我们的生存和人类文明的未来)
I believe this is a moral issue.(我坚信这是一个道德问题)
It is your time to seize this issue.(是时候着手解决它了)
It is our time to rise again,to secure our future.(是时候站起来保护我们的未来了)There's nothing that unusual about what I'm doing with this.(我今天为这件事所做的一切没有什么特别之处)
What is unusual is that I had the privilege to be shown it as a young man.(只不过我在年轻的时候就有幸认识了这个问题)
Ladies and gentlemen.
It's almost as if a window was opened through which the future was very clearly visible.(我们面前像是开了一扇窗,未来就清楚地摆在眼前)
"see that?"that's the future in which you are going to live your life.(看到了吗?那就是你们未来的生活图景)
Future generations may well have occasion to ask themselves,"what were our parents thinking?why didn't they wake up when they had a chance?"(那就是你们未来的生活图景。
我们的后代,偶尔出许会问,“我们的长辈们是怎么回事?在还来得及补救的时候为什么都不清醒点?”)
We have to hear that question from them,now.(他们的问题,我们现在就应该想到)。