P1-Article CSR-5

质量管理体系文件编号规定和标识规则一、一级文件（质量手册）编号规定质量手册编号由三部分组成：第一部分：公司英文简写，即XX第二部分：文件级别。

质量手册的文件级别用A表示。

第三部分：版本号。

版本号从0开始，第一次修改变为1，第二次修改变为2，依此类推。

举例：质量手册XX – A – 0英文简写版本号二、二级文件（程序文件）编号规定程序文件编号由四部分组成：第一部分：公司英文简写，即XX。

第二部分：文件级别。

程序文件的文件级别用B表示。

第三部分：流水号。

用1、2、3……依次排序。

第四部分：版本号。

版本号从0开始，第一次修改变为1，第二次修改变为2，依此类推。

举例：程序文件版本号XX – B – 1 - 0英文简写流水号三、三级文件编号规定三级文件编号由五部分组成：第一部分：公司英文简写，即XX。

第二部分：文件级别。

三级文件的文件级别用C表示。

第三部分：文件类别。

三级文件包括：工作依据、作业指导书、岗位职责。

a）工作依据类型：“法规”表示为“FG”“规章”表示为“GZ”“公司内部制度”表示为“ZD”（意为“制度”）“其他文件”表示为“QT”（意为“其他”）b）作业指导书作业指导书按用途分类，可分为：规范类、指南类、标准类、综合类。

“规范”用“GF”表示“指南”用“ZN”表示“标准”用“BZ”表示c）岗位职责用“ZZ”表示第四部分：流水号。

用1、2、3……依次排序。

第五部分：版本号。

版本号从0开始，第一次修改变为1，第二次修改变为2，依此类推。

举例：三级文件流水号XX – C –（LB）– 1 – 0英文简写文件类别版本号四、四级文件编号规则四级文件编号由五部分组成（每部分中间以“-”连接）：第一部分：公司英文简写，即XX第二部分：文件级别。

四级文件的文件级别用D表示。

第三部分：四级文件类型四级文件类型由三部分组成：用途+使用范围a）按用途分类，可分为：注册类、临床类、服务类、检查类、调查类、综合类、其他类。

高级项目管理师论文格式要求1、论文格式的一般要求1）论文由标题、署名、摘要、正文、注释及参考文献组成。

2）标题即论文的名称，应当能够反映论文的内容，或是反映论题的范围，尽量做到简短、直接、贴切、凝练、醒目和新颖。

3）摘要应简明扼要地概括论文的主要内容，一般不超过500字。

4）注释是对论文中需要解释的词句加以说明，或是对论文中引用的词句、观点注明来源出处。

注释一律采用脚注的方式（即在页末加注释）。

5）论文末尾须列出主要参考文献的目录。

6）注释和参考文献的标注格式为：①图书：作者、书名、出版城市、出版社名称、出版年、版次、页码②期刊：作者、篇名、期刊名称、年份、卷号（期号）、页码2、论文的编制论文的首页和扉页必须根据所附的模板（附表4）的要求进行设计。

首页之后要有一页目录，报告的主体部分约为A4纸20～40页，要求使用小四号字体、1.5倍行距，并标注文中引文的出处及相关文献。

附录部分一般不超过20页，可将个人相关资质证明、项目获奖证明等附后。

论文的最后应加上参考文献（包括内部使用的手册、规定、指南等）。

3、论文装订规格及要求（1）论文用A4标准纸张打印。

（2）页面设置上-- 2.0下-- 2.54左、右-- 各 3.7装订线—0页码—居中、居右均可（3）字体与字号题目–三号，黑体正文-- 小四号一级标题–四号，黑体其余均为小四号宋体（4）行距–固定值20磅封面使用统一格式（见下样表），用120g白色铜版纸，正文用70g白纸。

论文左侧装订，要求装订、剪切整齐，便于使用。

考生在参加鉴定报名时，提交论文电子稿1份，书面打印稿3份，论文一律装入文件袋并贴封。

附件一：论文封皮样本高级项目管理师（国家职业资格一级）论文题目姓名：单位：年月日附件二：论文扉页。

research paper格式Research papers generally follow a specific format, which includes the following sections:1. Title: The title of the research paper should be concise and clearly reflect the content of the study.2. Abstract: The abstract provides a brief summary of the research paper, including the research question, methods, major findings, and conclusions. It is usually around 150-250 words long.3. Introduction: The introduction section provides background information on the topic of the research, states the research problem or question, and outlines the objectives and significance of the study.4. Literature Review: This section presents a review of relevant existing literature and studies on the research topic. It provides a critical analysis of previous research and helps to situate the current study within the existing knowledge base.5. Methodology: The methodology section describes the methods and procedures used in the research. It includes information on the study design, population/sample, data collection methods, and data analysis techniques. This section should be detailed enough for another researcher to replicate the study.6. Results: The results section presents the findings of the research. This may include statistical analyses, tables, charts, or graphs to summarize and illustrate the data. The results section should beobjective and provide a clear presentation of the findings without interpretation or discussion.7. Discussion: In the discussion section, the researcher interprets and explains the results in the context of the research question and objectives. It may also compare the findings with previous studies and discuss the implications of the results on the broader field of research.8. Conclusion: The conclusion section summarizes the main findings of the study and provides a concise answer to the research question. It may also outline any limitations of the research and suggest avenues for future research.9. References: The references section lists all the sources cited in the research paper, following a specific citation style (such as APA, MLA, or Chicago). It demonstrates the research paper's credibility and allows readers to locate and verify the cited sources.It is important to note that research paper formats may vary depending on the specific requirements of the academic institution or the discipline of the research. Students or researchers should thoroughly read and follow the guidelines provided by their instructors or journals when formatting their research papers.。

05S502IntroductionThe purpose of this document is to provide an overview and detailed information about the 05S502 project. This document outlines the objectives, scope, stakeholders, and deliverables of the project. It also includes a timeline and resource allocation to help ensure successful completion of the project.ObjectivesThe main objective of the 05S502 project is to develop a new software application that will streamline the inventory management process for a retail company. The application will allow users to efficiently track and manage inventory levels, automate reorder processes, and generate analytics and reports for better decision-making.ScopeThe scope of the project includes the following:1.Developing a user-friendly interface for inventorymanagement purposes.2.Integrating the application with existing ERPsystems for seamless data transfer.3.Implementing automated reorder processes basedon predefined inventory thresholds.4.Generating reports and analytics to help identifytrends and optimize inventory levels.5.Testing and bug fixing to ensure the applicationfunctions as expected.StakeholdersThe stakeholders involved in the 05S502 project are as follows:•Project Sponsor: Mr. John Smith, Vice President of Operations•Project Manager: Ms. Jane Doe•Development Team: A team of software developers and testers•End Users: Employees responsible for inventory managementDeliverablesThe following deliverables are expected to be produced as part of the project:1.Fully functional inventory management application.er documentation and training materials.3.Integration with existing ERP systems.4.Automated reorder processes implemented andtested.5.Analytics and reporting module implemented andtested.TimelineThe project will be divided into the following phases, each with specific milestones and deadlines:1.Planning Phase (2 weeks):–Define project scope and objectives.–Identify and engage stakeholders.–Develop project timeline and resourceallocation.2.Development Phase (8 weeks):–Develop the user interface.–Integrate with ERP systems.–Implement automated reorder processes.–Implement analytics and reporting module.3.Testing Phase (2 weeks):–Conduct extensive testing of the application.–Identify and resolve any bugs or issues.4.Deployment Phase (1 week):–Train end users on how to use the application.–Roll out the application to production.Resource AllocationThe following resources will be allocated for the 05S502 project:•Project Manager: 100% of time for the duration of the project.•Development Team: 4 team members, each dedicated 100% of their time.•Testing Team: 2 team members, each dedicated 100% of their time.ConclusionThe 05S502 project aims to develop a user-friendly and efficient inventory management application for a retail company. By streamlining and automating the inventory management process, the application is expected to improve efficiency, reduce costs, and enhance decision-making. The project will be executed in a phased approach, with clear deliverables, a defined timeline, and allocated resources to ensure successful implementation.。

Document Name:Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedureDate Revised:21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden.Appendix to GES-0128:Outside Lab Capability AssessmentREQUIREMENTSREPORT FORMCOMMENTS CARDCOPYRIGHT © 2008 WHIRLPOOL CORPORATIONDocument Name:Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedureDate Revised:21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden. TABLE OF CONTENTSPage Foreword ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Auditee Preparation Guidelines ...................................................................................................... 11-12Suggested Outside Lab Capability Assessment Agenda ................................................................. 13 Outside Lab Capability Assessment Topics .................................................................................... 13 Requirement Statements and Guidelines ........................................................................................ 14-15 Auditee Final Assessment Status ................................................................................................... 16 Outside Lab Capability Assessment Requirements ......................................................................... 17 L1 - Quality Systems (equipment & data integrity)................................................................. 18 L2 - Materials Testing .......................................................................................................... 19 L3 - Codes & Regulatory Requirements ............................................................................... 20 L4 - Test Specifications & Procedures .................................................................................. 21 L5 - Test Plans .................................................................................................................... 22-23 L6 - Reliability ………………………………………………………………24 L7 - Lab Product Approval Process ...................................................................................... 25-26L8 – Lab Personnel Experience ………………………………….…………..27-28 L9 – Product Experience and Market Experience (29)Glossary of Terms …………………………………………………...30-31 Outside Lab Assessment Report .................................................................................................... 33 Assessment Individual Key Scores and Findings ............................................................................ 33-35 Comments Card ............................................................................................................................ 36 Comments & Suggestions ..............................................................................................................37Document Name:Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedureDate Revised:21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden.FOREWORDThe purpose of this document is to define the proper standard for the assessment of outside labs for potential data source(s) to support Whirlpool Corporation ’s product approval process. It is expected that any outside lab providing data will do so in a manner consistent with Whirlpool ’s Product Approval and Lab Operation process; thus, this Whirlpool ’s assessment is based upon the same “18 PALO Keys to Lab Improvement ” as is used internally at Whirlpool.This Outside Lab Assessment is to be used under the direction of a trained Product Approval representative.The contents of this document explain the necessary steps involved when going through a Whirlpool Outside Lab Assessment. The first section in this package is the “Outside Lab Audit Assessment Guidelines,” which are recommendations on how and what to prepare for the official assessment. Following that is the “Suggested Assessment Agenda .” This agenda is supplied to help the outside lab understand approximately how the time is allocated throughout the day while conducting the assessment. It is only a suggested agenda and does not take into account the size or complexity of the location beingassessed. The section “Guidelines for Use ” contains information about how to use this document. The biggest and most important section called “Assessment Requirements,” lists all the assessment requirements that will be used to evaluate the Outside Lab ’s Capabilities. This section is the core of the assessment process and the assessment team will evaluate the outside lab based upon this material. The sections have been organized to allow a natural flow or progression of questions while performing the Outside Lab Assessment. Finally, the last section called “Outside Lab Assessment Results &Comments Card ,” is a copy of the forms used to write the final assessment report. It includes a copy of a survey that may be filled out by the outside lab after the assessment is complete. It is through this feedback that we can continue to make the assessment process more valuable.This document shall provide all the necessary information to complete an Outside Lab Assessment and Final Report. If any more information is required, the outside lab shall contact the lead assessor. This person can answer any remaining questions.It is our intent that this process will provide Global Whirlpool Technology and Procurement personnel with a solidunderstanding of each Outside Lab ’s capabilities such that enlightened decisions can be made regarding potential testing outsourcing.AUDITEE PREPARATION GUIDELINESAUDITEE: This checklist is provided as an aid to help prepare you for your upcoming Outside Lab Capability Assessment . Basically, a Whirlpool team will be assessing your lab capabilities relative to specific Whirlpool needs and requirements. The key to a successful and efficient audit is preparation, both on the part of the auditee and the audit team. Your responsibility, as Auditee, is to make sure that the following items have been addressed and available as needed.A. Has the agenda for the day(s) of the audit been established and communicated? This is the responsibility ofWhirlpool Lead Assessor. If not complete, please contact the Lead Assessor.Document Name:Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedureDate Revised:21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden.B. Have you reviewed the Outside Lab assessment standard, understand the requirements and used them toperform a self-evaluation prior to the official visit? Have you sent a copy of your self-assessment to the Whirlpool Lead assessor? C. Do you understand the scoring system?D. Is your documentation and supporting evidence readily available? Suppliers should prepare for the assessmentby gathering initial documentation & evidence by key, summarize it, organize it in a manner that the information can be rapidly selected for discussion, and prepare for additional background evidence should the Lead Assessor desire additional material.Key Point: The audit can be conducted in a much more efficient manner if the supporting documentation isarranged in a sequence corresponding to the Whirlpool requirements.The audit documentation can be flowcharted according to your design process. You may arrange the evidence in that order and notify the lead auditor of the desired flow and the lead auditor will follow your recommendations by re-arranging the assessment keys in the order you have recommended (note: all keys must be completed).E. Have you identified the key contact person (Lab Manager or equivalent) to represent your organization andinterface with the lab assessment team? F. Do you have lead people identified for specific sections of the audit (i.e. reliability, equipment calibration,personnel experience, document management, planning, etc.)? Are they “ready ” when called upon? G. Has a conference room been reserved for the audit team to use? H. Is a telephone available? I.Given the expected complexity of the audit and the size of the facility, has the overall time duration of the audit been estimated and consideration given to necessary breaks, including lunch arrangements, if needed? (Note: In the interest of time, a quick working lunch brought to the audit location is typically preferred.)J. Is any safety equipment required (i.e. safety glasses, steel toe shoes, hearing protection, etc.)?Finally, if you have any other questions or concerns they can and should be resolved with the Whirlpool Certified Lead Assessor prior to the actual audit day.Document Name:Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedureDate Revised:21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden.SUGGESTED ASSESSMENT AGENDAACTIVITIES:EST. DURATIONIntroduction (Team members/Auditee representatives) .................................................................. 10 - 20 min. Auditee overview of Lab Operation & Facilities .............................................................................. 30 min. Lab Facility Tour ........................................................................................................................... 30 min - 1 Hr. Lab Capability Assessment ............................................................................................................ 4 - 6 Hrs. Scoring & Report Development (Whirlpool Team Only) ................................................................... 30 min – 1 Hr. Closure Meeting ............................................................................................................................ 30 - 45 min.Note: This suggested agenda does not take into account the size or complexity of the location being assessed. The estimated duration should be seen as a guideline only. A typical assessment can take anywhere from 5.0 hr. to 9.0 hrs .Outside Lab Capability Assessment TopicsKey No.KEY NAMEL1 QUALITY SYSTEMS (equipment & data integrity) L2 MATERIALS TESTINGL3 CODES & REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS L4 TEST SPECIFICATIONS & PROCEDURES L5 TEST PLANS L6 RELIABILITYL7 LAB PRODUCT APPROVAL PROCESS L8 LAB PERSONNAL EXPERIENCEL9PRODUCT EXPERIENCE AND MARKET EXPERIENCEDocument Name:Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedureDate Revised:21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden.REQUIREMENT STATEMENTS AND GUIDELINESAs mentioned in the Foreword, this audit was designed to evaluate all three dimensions of a lab ’s capability; the Personnel , Equipment, and Documentation . To achieve this, each assessment page is laid out in the following manner: The “KEY ” statements are the first statements written in “Bold ” letters on top of every page in the assessment. The keyDocument Name:Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedureDate Revised:21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden.Key ScoringAs indicated above, all keys have as a scoring technique a series of incremental points. Within each point are a number of ‘criteria statements ’ that correlate directly with increased compliance to the requirements of the key. From point-to-point these criteria build upon each other in a progressive manner toward excellence in the “Key ” subject matter.For the purposes of scoring, to achieve the “point being evaluated ” the auditee must, in the opinion of the Lead Assessor , meet or exceed all of the criteria based statements assigned to it . Only after meeting the current ‘point ’ requirements may the assessor look toward the next level of incremental criteria. Also, as noted above, to aid in scoring decisions, half-point scores (0.5, 1.5, or 2.5) are permissible.If all of the criteria are not met, the score shall be recorded at the previous “point ” level or, as appropriate, at the half-point score between the previous score and the next incremental score. Key ScoringPOINTSCRITERIA0 Non-Existent – System requirements have not been addressed; there is essentially no evidence of implementation or compliance.1 Traditional - System requirements may informally exist but they are unstructured and potentially inefficient. There is minimal compliance toward required standards.2 Learning - Adequate awareness and understanding of the preferred approach with basic proficiency and implementation levels, reasonable documentation.3 Leading – Full awareness and understanding of the preferred approach with effective and efficient implementation levels, solid documentation, an operational model.Lead Assessor QuestionsThe Lead Assessor Questions shown with each key are intended only as “thought provokers ” or “response generators ”. Their sole purpose is to stimulate supplier discussion on the key topic in a manner applicable to the key ’s scoring criteria. They are not meant to be “all inclusive ”; thus a supplier should focus their attention on the scoring criteria and not the lead assessor questions.Overlap of Key ContentFrom time-to-time it is fully expected that the content of various “Keys ” will overlap with the content of similar keys. To a degree, this is planned into the assessment. The repetition of seeing a topic in multiple areas of this assessment simply signifies the importance of its content.While this may spark some discussion regarding fairness of scoring if the auditee has a particular weakness in the duplicated area; it needs to be recognized as well that if the auditee has strength in this area, their strength will be likewise be multiplied throughout the assessment.Document Name:Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedureDate Revised:21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden.None, No, Some, Occasional, Most, Majority, All and Always in Criteria Statements:Many of the Results Oriented criteria statements are specifically designed to probe the level of results that the design system should create. There are four levels of evaluation for these questions that contain results oriented requirements. These four levels can be recognized by the use of the words “None, Some, Most and All ” (and their synonyms) in the evaluation criteria. The meaning of these words can be reasonably quantified as shown in the following table:LEVEL RANGE None, no 0 – 5 % Some, occasional 6 - 50 % Most, majority 51 - 85 % All, always86 - 100 %Multiple Outside Lab OperationsIf an Outside Lab has multiple lab operations (i.e. an automotive lab, an appliance lab, a lab for all others, etc.) for the purpose of managing development, cost, and efficiency, the Whirlpool Outside Lab Assessment shall be applied to the section of the Outside Lab ’s business that would typically be utilized to test Whirlpool parts and product.ASSESSMENT STATUSAuditee Status:In addition to the assessment scores, auditees are classified under one of the four different status choices. This status is with regard only to the capability assessment. Additional reviews of specific facility, equipment, fixtures, and test procedure reviews are necessary for final determination of qualification level. These four status choices are Full Qualification , Conditional Qualification, Qualification in Process, and No Qualification . See matrix below:Assessment StatusCriteria(assumes all Keys are being assessed)Full Qualification Assessment that has a minimum score of 2 points or more for each key.Conditional Qualification Assessment that has less than a minimum score of 2 points for any key, but has documented an improvement plan that is acceptable to Whirlpool, with regard to quality and schedule.Qualification InProcessAssessment that is not complete, but plans are in place.No QualificationNo plans or desire to qualify currently.Document Name:Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedureDate Revised:21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden.OUTSIDE LABASSESSMENTREQUIREMENTSDocument Name:Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedureDate Revised:21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden.KEY #L1 - QUALITY SYSTEM (EQUIPMENT & DATA INTEGRITY)Description: This ‘Key ’ is designed to understand the process for maintaining integrity of their test equipment, test and equipment procedures (work instructions), and test records. Lead Assessor Questions:1. What is your process to calibrate & update laboratory test equipment?2. What is your process for updating test / equipment procedures or work instructions?3. What is your document control process for test records?4. What independent lab certifications or accreditations do you currently hold? (ie. ISO-17025, UL, etc.) 0 pts There is no evidence of test equipment calibrationNo evidence of a process to maintain control of test procedures (work instructions) andtest records.1 ptSome evidence of acceptable test equipment calibration; some examples of expiredcalibration tagsAn informal process to maintain control of test data & documentation exists (procedures,work instructions, etc.).Some test procedures are out-of-date or do not match actual practice2 ptsMost equipment has acceptable calibration and measurement systems analysis evidenceavailableA formal process to maintain control of test data & documentation exists (procedures,work instructions, etc.).Most test procedures are up-of-date and match actual practiceThere exists evidence that key test procedures are reviewed periodically3 ptsThe lab is currently ISO-17025 accredited OR meets the following requirements:All equipment has acceptable calibration and measurement systems analysisevidence availableAll test data (records) is stored in an easily accessible location, controlled through aformal document control system, and are kept for set periods of time (e.g. records retention)All test procedures are up-of-date and match actual practiceAll test procedures are reviewed per schedule or process trigger (evidence required) Equipment is calibrated based upon MSE / MSA needs or control chartingNotes* - calibratedbased upon factual, demonstrated evidence that ‘control ’ has been lost in the measurement device as opposed to calibration based upon a selected time interval.Document Name: Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedureDate Revised: 21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden.KEY #L2 – MATERIALS TESTINGDescription: The Auditee may be expected to have a fully equipped materials testing lab to analyze and test materials for proper formulation and material properties analysis during design and development. Expected scope would be materials applicable to the industry of the products being tested.Lead Assessor Questions:1. What material testing capability do you have at this location?2. Do you have all the material testing equipment needed for your products?3. Do you have plans to update the materials testing lab? 0 pts There are no materials testing capabilities at this locationAll materials are contracted out for testing and/or analysis1 ptsSome material testing is completed at this locationThe more difficult material testing is contracted outMost auditee test personnel have less than (2) years of test experienceMost materials testing is done based upon informal, unapproved procedures2 pts Most materials testing is completed at this locationMost material testing is completed with formal, detailed test procedures and analysisreports.Most test result records are archived for future referenceSome auditee test personnel have greater than (5) years of test experienceSome test personnel have (2) or more years of formal college training3 pts All material testing is completed with formal, detailed test procedures and analysisreports.All test result records are archived for future referenceAll test result records are archived and easily retrieved for future referenceSome auditee test personnel have greater than (10) years of test experienceMost test personnel are degreed engineersNotesDocument Name: Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedureDate Revised: 21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden.KEY #L3 – CODES & REGULATORY REQUIREMENTSDescription: This ‘Key ’ is intended to understand how codes and regulatory requirements are implemented and validated at the auditee ’s facility. It also is intended to assess the competency of personnel associated with the codes and regulatory operations.Lead Assessor Questions:1. Please describe the methods used in your product development group to ensure adherence to regulatory agency codesand product safety requirements.2. Please describe your level of certification (of lab and technicians) by appropriate codes agencies (e.g. UL, CSA, IEC,etc.).0 pts No identified codes function at this design locationNo codes agency certification of lab and/or technicians Auditee expects all codes & regulatory requirements to be their customer ’s responsibility 1 ptSome engineering change notice approvals include a sign-off from a codes/safety standpoint There is some evidence that outside codes houses are leveraged to minimize the risk that regulatory gaps may exist 2 ptsSome codes engineer(s) are in place at auditees design facility Some codes agency certification of auditees lab and/or technicians – or - some evidence that outside codes houses are leveraged Most engineering change notices are reviewed and signed-off by a codes/safety expert Most codes requirements are completed by product release Most code engineer test requirements are fully documented 3 ptsLead codes engineer has more than 5 years experience in the Product Approval and Lab Operations All engineering change notices AND temporary change authorizations have a codes/safety sign-off All appropriate labs and technicians are certified by regional appropriate codes agency All codes requirements are completed by product release All code engineer test requirements are fully documented NotesDocument Name: Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedure Date Revised: 21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden.KEY #L4 - TEST SPECIFICATIONS & PROCEDURESDescription: Test specifications and procedures are the backbone of the testing and validation process. Their accuracy and use drive the verification and fitness for use decisions that must be made for new and revised products. This key investigates the auditee ’s test specification management system.Lead Assessor Questions:1.What is your process to develop and update test specifications? 1.Is there linkage of test specifications to customer needs? 2.How is data from the field used to create or improve specifications? 3.Who reviews newly created specifications prior to formal release? What is their authority? 4.How are specifications / test procedures reviewed over time? 5. What independent lab certifications or accreditations do you currently hold? (ie. ISO-17025, UL, etc.)0 ptsThere is no process to develop or update test specifications 1 pt There is limited input from design, customer, and field test results into test specificationcreationTest specifications are informally written by individuals who individually put them to useProcedures / test specifications are informally reviewed2 pts A formal process exists for the development and updating of test specifications; however, itmay not always be used as individually generated test specifications still occasionally existThere is some input from ‘the customer ’ and ‘field test results ’ into test specificationdevelopmentThere is some collaboration between design and the lab organizations in test specificationcreationReleased procedures / test specifications are formally reviewed to ensure correctness;review schedule is variable3 pts The lab is currently ISO-17025 accredited OR meets the following requirements:A formal, approved process for the development and updating of specifications existsand its use is a business requirement.Most specifications are developed based upon customer intended functions and are tiedto customer needs / benefits with historical data from the fieldA great deal of collaboration exists between design and lab organizations in testspecification creationReleased procedures / test specifications are regularly reviewed by a cross-functionaltechnical team according to a developed scheduleNotesDocument Name: Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedureDate Revised: 21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden.KEY #L5 – TEST PLANSDescription: This ‘Key ’ evaluates the process used to develop and implement test plans for testing and approving products that meet customer requirements. It includes how test plans are continuously improved with new requirements such that results achieved from approved product lead to better products.Lead Assessor Questions:1.How are test plans for new features / products developed? Who has input to their creation? 2.Please describe how DFMEA ’s provide directional content to the creation of your test plans. 3.Is there a standardized template used for test plan development? 4.When in the development cycle are test plans created and how are they linked to the customer specifications? 5.Are new tests developed when new specifications are created? 0 ptsAuditee has no formal test plans - they do minimal testing Auditee does not create their own test plans (customer assumes this responsibility) 1 pt Evidence shows only standard tests are used and minimal or no critical thought is given for newtests.Tests plans are typically created close to product launch (reacting to the timetable)The Product Approval Group & Design Engineering only occasionally interact in test plandevelopmentThere is evidence that DFMEA ’s are used in some test plan creation.2 pts Test plans are based on prior test documents; no specific regional /global template is usedNew, unique tests are developed for unique features or new product based upon customerinsightsSome test plans are developed early in the process.Test plans are jointly developed between the Product Approval Group and Design EngineeringGroup with the Product Approval Group having the overall authority on most test plan content.There is some test plan coordination / interaction with customers (i.e. effect on other customerparts).There is evidence that DFMEA ’s are used in most test plan creation.3 ptsTest plan development template (w/standard tests) used to drive critical thought for all projecttest plans.There is clear evidence of new tests proactively developed and based upon customer insights.These tests are shown to be linked to newly developed product specificationsTest plans are jointly developed with the Product Approval Group and Design Engineering, andit is clearly documented that the Product Approval engineer has the final authority on all test plan content.There is considerable test plan coordination / interaction with customers (i.e. effect on othercustomer parts).There is evidence that DFMEA ’s are used in all test plan creation.Most test plans are developed early in the process.。

rcssci用法RCSSCI（ResearcherID Citation Summary）是Web of Science平台上的一个指标，用于评估研究人员的学术影响力。

RCSSID的使用方法主要涉及以下几个方面：1. 创建RCSSCI个人资料：首先，您需要在Web of Science平台上创建一个RCSSID个人资料。

通过登录您的Web of Science账户，您可以使用ResearcherID网站创建一个新的个人资料，或者将现有个人资料导入到RCSSCI中。

3. 录入研究成果：在RCSSCI个人资料中，您可以录入自己的研究成果，以展示您的学术贡献。

您可以手动录入文献信息，或者使用Web of Science数据库中的检索工具自动导入文献数据。

确保您录入的信息准确无误，这样才能准确评估您的学术影响力。

4.监控引用次数：RCSSCI的一个重要功能是能够跟踪您的研究成果被引用的次数。

一旦您的文献被引用，RCSSID将自动更新您的引用次数。

您可以定期查看RCSSCI个人资料中的引用次数统计，了解您的研究影响力。

5.查看他人的RCSSCI资料：除了展示自己的学术影响力，您还可以使用RCSSCI查询其他研究人员的个人资料。

通过输入其RCSSID或姓名，您可以获取他人的学术成就和影响力指标。

这对于学术合作、评估同行的研究水平等非常有用。

6.RCSSCI与其他学术指标的结合使用：RCSSCI还可以与其他学术指标（例如H指数、引用指标等）一起使用，以更全面地评估研究人员的学术水平。

您可以将RCSSCI个人资料链接到其他学术平台，或者将RCSSCI的数据导出到其他指标分析工具中进行进一步的分析。

总的来说，RCSSID是一个用于评估研究人员学术影响力的工具。

您可以使用它来展示自己的研究成果、跟踪研究成果的引用次数，了解他人的学术水平，并与其他学术指标结合使用以获得更全面的评估结果。

以下是关于如何使用RCSSCI的一些建议：-定期更新个人信息和研究成果，以确保RCSSCI的准确性。

5lsa产生条件-回复在学术研究和创作中，使用规范的引用方式对于准确记录和引用他人作品是至关重要的。

5lsa（第五类网络文献引用规范）就是一种用于在学术论文和文章中引用网络资源的标准规范。

本文将一步一步回答关于5lsa产生条件的问题，并分析其对学术界的影响。

1. 5lsa的产生背景是什么？因为信息技术的快速发展与普及，网络资源的利用已经成为学术研究和学习的重要途径之一。

然而，由于网络资源的复杂性和变化性，传统的文献引用规范无法准确、全面地记录和引用网络资源。

为了解决这个问题，学术界开始探索和制定一种新的引用规范，即5lsa。

2. 5lsa的制定依据有哪些？为了确保引用的准确性和可追溯性，5lsa基于以下几个依据进行制定：- 对网络资源的特点进行全面理解和分析，包括链接地址的动态变化、内容的即时更新等。

这有助于根据网络资源的实际情况制定引用规范。

- 借鉴和总结传统文献引用规范的经验和教训，使5lsa与传统规范相互补充，并保持一致性和稳定性。

3. 5lsa对引用网络资源的要求是什么？根据5lsa的规范要求，引用网络资源应具备以下几个要素：- 源标题：引用内容的来源标题应明确、准确地揭示出引用内容的来源。

- 网址：引用内容应附带准确的链接地址，以确保读者能够快速访问到引用的内容，并及时核查引用的准确性。

- 时间标记：引用内容应标明引用的时间信息，包括访问时间和内容更新时间。

这对于保证引用内容的可追溯性非常重要。

4. 如何编写符合5lsa规范的引用？根据5lsa的规范要求，可以采用以下步骤编写符合规范的引用：- 了解引用对象的来源标题，并确保准确记录来源的名称。

- 获取引用内容的链接地址，并在引用中附带该链接地址。

- 在引用内容之后加入时间标记，包括访问时间和内容更新时间。

5. 5lsa对学术界的影响是什么？通过引入5lsa这种新的引用规范，学术界的网络资源引用得到了规范化和系统化。

这使得学术研究者可以更加准确、全面地记录和引用网络资源，使引用内容更加可信、可追溯。

修改稿上传指南注意事项：^_^1、一个邮箱只能对应一个账号并上传一篇论文，如果您有多篇文章，请与组委会邮件联系，并提供一个新邮箱。

2、请关注系统显示的稿件编号与自身稿件编号是否相符合，如果不符合，请与组委会联系。

3、关注作者信息及关键词是否填写完整，如果不完整需要及时修改。

4、论文accepted后作者将不能进行修改，在截止日前如果有重大错误或遗漏，请与组委会邮件联系，由组委会代为修改。

5、确保word/pdf/版权协议/论文题目的一致性，所有上述内容的完整性，否则将无法发表。

6、作者登陆后右上角会出现“Access Disabled”字符提醒，作者无需理会。

文章编期以及排定页码后，该状态才会改变。

7、如果您需要重新上传文章，请按照如下步骤进行：1）进入登陆界面，输入账号密码；2）点击participant进入本次投稿界面点击mypaper按钮然后点击paper title即可；3）直接上传文章的最新版本即可进行覆盖。

8、按上述要求上传论文以及填写各项信息后，你的论文仍将处于Submitted状态，你无须理会，工作人员会在检查论文格式以及其他事项后，将---您的论文修改为Accepted状态（这段时间可能比较长）。

如果论文存在问题，工作人员会联系您。

您不需要致电组委会询问论文状态，由于此前已经发送录用通知给您，我们确保你的论文会按时发表。

9、当您上传论文修改稿之后，版权协议才会自动生成，此前，你看不到版权协议文件的下载链接。

10、如果你按要求上传了论文，而且完成了注册，并已将注册表发回到组委会邮箱，您的工作就已经完成了。

组委会将核对你的款项和检查您的^_^论文，如果有问题，组委会会电话或邮件联系您。

如果没有联系您，即一切正常。

---第一步：登陆系统1）请采用Internet Explorer 8.0, 低版本可能导致有些项目数据无法填写。

2）输入网址, 登陆到Trans Tech Publications的网络数据库。

isscc文章格式
ISSCC（International Solid-State Circuits Conference）的文章格式通常包括以下几部分：
1.Title Page：包含论文的标题、作者信息、所属机构等。

2.Abstract：简要介绍论文的主要内容、研究背景、研究目的等。

3.Table of Contents：列出论文的各个章节和相应的页码。

4.Introduction：介绍研究背景和目的、相关领域的发展现状以及本
文的主要内容等。

5.Related Work：介绍该领域内已有的研究成果以及本文的创新点或
改进点等。

6.Methodology：详细描述本文所采用的研究方法和技术，包括实验
设计、数据处理和分析等。

7.Experimental Results：展示实验结果和分析，包括性能指标、对比
分析和讨论等。

8.Conclusion：总结本文的主要研究成果和结论，并指出可能的不足
和未来研究方向。

9.References：列出本文中所引用的参考文献。

以上是ISSCC文章格式的基本要求，但具体格式可能会因不同的会议而略有不同。

在撰写论文时，应仔细阅读会议的投稿指南，遵循具体的要求进行排版和撰写。

硕士学位论文写作格式要求1、页面设置B5页面，上2.7cm，下2.4cm，左2.8cm，右2.6cm；距边界，页眉1.5cm，页角1.5cm。

2、论文装订顺序中文封面，英文封面，中文摘要，英文摘要，目录，正文部分，参考文献，致谢3、目录目录格式：一级标题：小四，宋体＋Arial，1.3倍行距，无缩进。

二级标题：小四，宋体＋Arial，1.3倍行距，左缩进2字符（中文字符）三级标题：小四，宋体＋Arial，1.3倍行距，左缩进4字符（中文字符）4、正文正文：小四，宋体＋Arial， 1.3倍行距，首行缩进2个中文字符。

5、标题一级标题：黑体＋Arial，小三，段前1.5行，段后1.5行，单倍行距。

形式如“第1章”。

二级标题：黑体＋Arial，四号，段前0.5行，段后0行，单倍行距。

形式如“1.1”。

三级标题：黑体＋Arial，小四，段前0.75行，段后0行，1.3倍行距。

形式如“1.1.1”。

在二级标题和三级标题中，标题号和标题之间空两个格，例如：3.2 催化重整固定床反应器综合数学模型3.2.1 基本微分方程组四级及以下标题：宋体、加黑、小四号字、1.3倍行距、段前0行、段后0行、首行缩进2字符6、表格（1）表格标题：段前0.5行，段后0行，单倍行距，黑体＋Arial ，居中，五号（2）表格正文：黑体＋Arial ，五号（3）表的格式为三线表，黑色单线形，线粗0.75磅。

（4）表中“－”表示未发现，“空白”表示未测或无此项，“0”代表实测结果确为零。

（5）表格中数字栏所有内容居中；最左侧项目栏中，不同项目左对齐，垂直居中；某一项目中的具体子项目水平和垂直方向均居中。

（6）表格要尽量紧挨正文说明部分。

表格格式如下：表3-1 原料油的主要性质项 目HAGO HVGO 加氢油 HVGO大庆常压重油密度（20 ℃），kg/m 3858.1 914.1 962.8 906.9 残炭，wt% 0.007 0.024 0.071 4.300 平均分子量 260 278 340 577 氢含量，wt% 13.07 12.00 11.24 13.11 碳含量，wt% 86.07 87.79 85.22 86.52 H/C 原子比 1.82 1.64 1.58 1.82 芳碳率，%14.69 22.08 29.03 10.90 烃类组成，wt%烷 烃 39.9 6.5 2.8 57.08 环烷烃 31.8 42.8 33.7 芳香烃 28.3 50.7 55.8 27.61 胶质+沥青质7.715.317、公式公式要按照下面的样式录入，公式要居中，公式编号为（3.1）或（3-1）形式，且该行要右对齐。

西安邮电大学研究生学位论文撰写规范（试行）学位论文是研究生从事科研工作的主要成果，它集中表明了作者在研究工作中具有的新的发明、理论或见解，是研究生申请硕士学位的重要依据，也是科研领域中的重要文献资料和社会的宝贵财富。

为规范学位论文撰写，保证学位论文质量，根据国家有关标准和本院实际，特制定本规范。

1论文结构学位论文应采用汉语撰写。

一般由十二部分组成，依次为：1.封面，2.中文扉页，3.中文摘要，4.英文摘要，5.目录，6.主要符号表，7.正文（含结论），8.参考文献，9.附录，10.攻读学位期间取得的研究成果，11.致谢，12.声明。

2书写规范2.1封面采用全院统一格式，封面上须填写的内容包括：论文题目、学位申请人姓名、指导教师姓名、论文提交日期等内容。

2.2中文扉页采用全院统一格式。

封面上须填写的内容包括：学校代码、学号、分类号、密级（如属保密论文）、论文题目、学位申请人姓名、指导教师姓名、学科（专业）名称、学位类别、论文提交日期等内容。

分类号：指《中国图书资料分类法》的分类号。

密级：包括绝密、机密、秘密，没有密级此项则为空。

单位代码：西安邮电大学单位代码为11664。

论文题目：应是既能概括整个论文的中心内容，又能引人注目，一般控制在20个汉字以内，并不设副标题。

学科门类：按学科分类分别为“工学”、“管理学”、“经济学”、“法学”“理学”等。

学科（专业）：指作者主修专业的名称，一般指二级学科。

对于按一级学科培养的研究生，应填写相应一级学科的名称。

学科名称的填写必须与国务院学位委员会颁布的《授予博士、硕士学位和培养研究生的学科、专业目录》中的名称相符。

2.3中文摘要摘要正文约1000字左右，一般包括：从事这项研究工作的目的和重要性；完成了哪些工作（作者独立进行的研究工作及相应结果的概括性叙述）；获得的主要结论（这是本摘要的中心内容）；摘要应突出论文的新见解。

论文关键词的选取要简明扼要，切忌罗列过多（3~5个）。