国外SCI期刊投稿常识模板

SCI投稿Methods模板摘要在SCI（Science Citation Index）投稿中，方法（Methods）部分是非常重要的，它详细描述了实验设计、数据采集和数据分析等步骤。

本文档提供了一个SCI投稿Methods模板，可以帮助您快速整理和书写方法部分，以提高投稿的质量和可接受性。

1. 实验设计和样本选择在实验设计部分，首先要明确研究的目的和假设。

然后，描述实验设计的具体步骤和流程，包括实验组和对照组的设置、样本量的确定、随机分组等。

2. 数据采集和测量描述数据采集的具体方法和测量指标。

包括实验装置的选择、观测的变量、数据记录的方法等。

如果有必要，可以介绍一些标准方法或现有的测量工具。

3. 数据处理和分析说明数据处理和分析的步骤，包括数据的预处理、统计方法的选择以及相关软件的使用。

如果有使用统计学方法，要详细描述使用的具体方法，并提供相关引用。

4. 实验环境和条件描述实验进行的环境和条件。

例如，实验室的温度、湿度、光照等参数，以及实验操作员的培训和操作规范等。

5. 伦理许可和知情同意如果您的研究涉及人类或动物，必须明确描述您已经获得的伦理许可和知情同意。

同时，要遵守相关的伦理准则和法律法规。

6. 数据可靠性和统计分析强调数据的可靠性和稳定性，并说明重复实验的次数和结果的一致性。

另外，要详细描述使用的统计方法和显著性水平的选择。

7. 数据可视化对于实验中采集的数据，可以使用图表或图像进行可视化展示。

这有助于读者更好地理解和分析结果。

8. 效果评价和结果解释最后，对实验结果进行评价和解释。

解释结果的可靠性和一致性，并与已有的研究结果进行对比和讨论。

结论本文提供了一个SCI投稿Methods模板，旨在帮助作者清晰地组织和书写方法部分。

请根据具体的研究内容和SCI投稿要求进行相应的修改和调整，以确保方法部分的准确性、可重复性和可接受性。

sci投稿注意事项（实用版）目录1.SCI 投稿前的准备工作2.选择合适的期刊3.投稿过程中的注意事项4.修改和完善稿件5.投稿后的跟进正文作为一名科研工作者，将自己的研究成果发表在国际知名的 SCI 期刊上，不仅可以提高个人声誉，还能推动学术领域的发展。

但是，在投稿过程中有许多需要注意的细节，下面我们就来详细了解一下 SCI 投稿的注意事项。

首先，我们要做好投稿前的准备工作。

确保自己的论文符合 SCI 期刊的要求，如论文格式、字数限制、图表规范等。

同时，我们还需要对论文进行严格的审阅，确保没有语法、拼写和逻辑错误。

其次，选择合适的期刊是非常重要的。

我们需要对各个 SCI 期刊进行充分的了解，包括其影响因子、投稿周期、审稿流程等，以便选择一个与自己研究领域和论文质量相匹配的期刊。

在投稿过程中，我们需要注意以下几点：首先，投稿系统中需要填写的信息要准确无误，特别是作者联系方式和邮箱地址，以便编辑和审稿人能及时与我们取得联系。

其次，投稿时需遵循期刊的投稿要求，如投稿格式、投稿费等。

最后，在投稿过程中要保持良好的沟通，遇到问题要及时与期刊编辑部联系。

投稿后，我们还需要对稿件进行修改和完善。

在收到审稿意见后，要认真阅读并分析审稿人的意见，对论文进行相应的修改。

对于拒稿的论文，我们要保持积极的心态，分析原因并进行改进，以便将论文发表在更合适的期刊上。

最后，投稿后的跟进也是非常关键的。

我们需要密切关注投稿状态，与期刊编辑部保持良好的沟通，了解审稿进度，以便在第一时间得知审稿结果。

总之，在 SCI 投稿过程中，我们需要注意诸多细节，做好充分的准备工作，选择合适的期刊，并在投稿后及时修改和完善稿件。

General-Template[Title Page]Article TitleAuthorsAuthor affiliationsCorrespondence information: Corresponding author name,affiliation, detailed permanent address, email address,telephone number(Check the Guide for authors to see the required information onthe title page)Put the title of your abstract here using both upper and lower case letters, Times New Roman, 12?pts, bold, centered, doublespacedA.?Author a,B.?Author b,C.?Author a,*a Department, University, Street, Postal-Code City, Countryb Laboratory, Institute, Street, Postal-Code City, Country AbstractThis general template helps you on preparing manuscript for part of Elsevier Journals. Use this document as a template if you are using Microsoft Word 6.0 or later. Here comes self-contained abstract. Please read the Guide for Authors of your target journal for the requirements of Abstract. Pay special attention to the word count.PACS(optional, as per journal):Keywords:Keyword 1.D; Keyword 2.B (Read the Guide for Authors for the requirements for Keywords, including number, thesaurus, and classification indications)* Corresponding author. Tel.: +xx xxx xx xx; fax: +xx xxx xx xx.1. IntroductionThe manuscript should be prepared and submitted according to the Guide for Authors of your taget journal. . For your convenience, brief instructions on manuscript preparation are recorded below.Please DO consult a recent journal paper for style and conventions. You may find samples on ScienceDirect. You need to check your manuscript carefully before you submit it. The editor reserves the right to return manuscripts that do not conform to the instructions for manuscript preparation.2. General remarks on manuscript preparationGenerally, double line spacing, 12 pts font, and Times New Roman are preferred when you type the manuscript for review. This text formatting is provided in order to facilitate referee process and is also required for proper calculation of your manuscript length. Typing your manuscript follows the order: Title, Authors, Affiliations, Abstract, Keywords, Main text, Acknowledgements (optional), References (optional), Figure captions, Figures and Tables. Please consult the Guide for Authors for the proper organization of the main text. Ensure thateach new paragraph is clearly indicated. Some journals also require lines to be numbered throughout the manuscript. You will usually want to divide your article into numbered sections and subsections. Present figures and tables at the right places mentioned in the Guide for Authors.Most formatting codes are removed or replaced while processing your article so there is no need for you to use excessive layout styling. Please do not use options such as automatic word breaking, double columns or automatic paragraph numbering (especially for numbered references). Do use bold face, italic, subscripts, superscripts, etc., as appropriate.2.1 IllustrationsMany journals required that figures and tables to be presented on separate pages at the end of the manuscript. The preferable file formats are: EPS (for vector graphics) and TIF (for bitmaps). However, PDF and MS Office (Word, Excel, Powerpoint figures) files are also acceptable. Use file names that enable to identify their contents in terms of figure number and format (e.g. fig1.tif, fig2.eps, fig3.pdf). All artwork has to be numbered according to its sequence in the text. All of them should havecaptions. Colour figures in printed version require an extra fee for most journals. Generally, no vertical rules (lines) should be used in tables. Illustrations should not duplicate descriptions that appear elsewhere in the manuscript.Please look at for more detailed instructions on artwork preparations.2.2 EquationsConventionally, in mathematical equations variables and anything thatrepresents a value appear in italics. You are encouraged to use equation-editing tools such as mathtype to edit equations. Please make use of the numbering and referencing functions.2.3 CitationsThere are different styles of in-text citations and reference lists. DO consult the Guide for Authors to see the given examples. Pay special attention to the format of author names, journal names, publication year, volume and page span.AcknowledgementsThis section is optional.References[1].[2].Figure CaptionsFig.1 Put at this page the collected figure captions. The figure captions should be as brief as possible. It should also contain sufficient information that readers do not need to refer to the main text.Fig.2 Put here the figure caption of figure 2 (also the legend to figure 2).Fig. 3Fig.?1. Sample figure. Do not reduce or enlarge any images after placement in an MS Office application as this can lead to loss of image quality. While inserting vector graphics ensure that you use only truetype fonts. These should preferably be in one, or a combination, of the following fonts: Arial, Courier, Helvetica, Symbol, Times.Table?1Sample table: (使用三线表)Parameter Compound?1 Compound?2 a (?) 4.5832 4.9365Δ E a (eV) 1.745 1.592 ………………a This is an example of a table footnote.关于Elsevier旗下期刊投稿1 关于Elsevier旗下期刊投稿概述(1) Elsevier旗下共有1300多种期刊。

SCI投稿全过程信件模板一览来源
我希望以此信函向贵刊投稿，并希望获得贵刊对于我研究成果的评估和发表机会。

我是一名从事（研究领域）的研究人员，目前所研究的主题与贵刊的专业领域高度契合，因此我相信我的研究成果将对贵刊的读者具有重要的学术意义。

以下是我对于投稿的全过程信件模板，请您查阅：
1. 封面信（Cover Letter）
假如您对于我研究的兴趣颇高并愿意鉴定我的研究成果，请写这个关于封面信。

简要地介绍投稿的目的和研究的背景，并强调研究的重要性和新颖性。

同时，特别指出为何我选择贵刊投稿以及希望获得发表与评估的机会。

2. 摘要页（Abstract）
3. 介绍（Introduction）
4. 方法（Methods）
5. 结果（Results）
6. 讨论（Discussion）
7. 结论（Conclusion）
8. 致谢（Acknowledgements）
最后，我衷心希望贵刊能够考虑我的投稿，并给予我一个发表研究成果的机会。

我相信我的研究成果将对贵刊的学术质量和影响力有所提升。

非常感谢您的时间和关注。

顺祝商祺。

衷心。

一、投稿时的Cover latter1). Here within enclosed is our paper for consideration to be published on "(Journal name)". The further information about the paper is in the following:The Title: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXThe Authors: XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXXXThe authors claim that none of the material in the paper has been published or is under consideration for publication elsewhere.I am the corresponding author and my address and other information is as follows:Address: Department of XXXXXXXXX,College of Chemistry and Enviromental Science, Henan Normal UniversityXinxiang City, Henan Province, 453007,P.R.ChinaE-mail:Tel: +86-XXX-XXXXXXXFax: +86-XXX-XXXXXXXThank you very much for consideration!Sincerely Yours,Dr. XXX2). Dear Dr. A:I am sending a manuscript entitled “ ” by – which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - .Yours sincerely3). Dear Dr. A:Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers.4). Dear Dr. A:Please find enclosed for your review an origin al research article, “” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.二、询问有无收到稿件Dear Editors,We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help.三、询问论文审查回音Dear Editors，It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.四、关于论文的总体审查意见1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as –4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of – because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?五、给编辑的回信1. In reply to t he referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an erroror omission.3. Thank you for your letter of –and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript entitled “”. We have studied their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval.4. I enclosed a revised manuscript which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original fin dings are confirmed.5. We are sending the revised manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in Table 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account.10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper.11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments c oncerning Figures 1 and 2 result from a misinterpretation of the data.12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available.13. We prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the cells, we consider it essential.15. The running title has been changed to “”.16. The Materials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope and assaying hexokinase.17. The concentration of HA T media (page12 paragraph 2) was incorrectly stated in the original manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors are grateful to the referees for pointing out their error.18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of the possibility of laser action on chromosome has been included (page16, paragraph 2).19. We included a new set of photographs with better definition than those originally submitted and to which a scale has been added.20. Following the suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure 3 and 4.21. Two further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text and Reference section. These are:22. We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have now produced a more balance and better account of our work. We trust that the revised manuscript is acceptable for publication.23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript is now suitable for publication.24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to improve our paper.25. I apologize for the delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing an additional experiment, as suggested by referees转载--SCI期刊投稿状态投稿术语名词解释/s/blog_6763380d01013buh.html1. Submitted to Journal 刚提交的状态2. Manuscript received by Editorial Office 就是你的文章到了编辑手里了，证明投稿成功3. With editor 如果在投稿的时候没有要求选择编辑，就先到主编那，主编会分派给别的编辑。

SCI投稿信件的一些套话和模板SCI投稿信件的一些套话和模板一、投稿信1. Dear Dr. Defendi ML:I am sending a manuscript. entitled “” by – which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - .Yours sincerely2. Dear Dr. A:Enclosed is a manuscript. entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s reader s.3. Dear Dr. A:Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, “” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.二、询问有无收到稿件Dear Editors,We dispatched our manuscript. to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript. again. Thank you in advancefor your help.三、询问论文审查回音Dear Editors，It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript. (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.四、关于论文的总体审查意见1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as –4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.5. This manuscript. is not suitable for publication in the journal of –because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has beenmarred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.8. The wording and style. of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?五、给编辑的回信1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission.3. Thank you for your letter of –and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript. entitled “”. We have studied their comments carefully and have made correctionwhich we hope meet with their approval.4. I enclosed a revised manuscript. which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original findings are confirmed.5. We are sending the revised manuscript. according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.6. We found the re feree’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript.7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript. is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in Table 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account.10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper.11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments concerning Figures 1 and 2 result from a misinterpretation of the data.12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available.13. We prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the cells, we consider it essential.15. The running title has been changed to “”.16. The Materials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope and assaying hexokinase.17. The concentration of HAT media (page12 paragraph 2) was incorrectly stated in the original manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors are grateful to the referees for pointing out their error.18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of the possibility of laser action on chromosome has been included (page16, paragraph 2).19. We included a new set of photographs with better definition than those originally submitted and to which a scale has been added.20. Following the suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure 3 and 4.21. Two further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text and Reference section. These are:22. We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have now produced a more balance and better account of our work. We trust that the revised manuscript. is acceptable for publication.23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript. is now suitable for publication.24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to improve our paper.25. I apologize for the delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing an additional experiment, as suggested by referees.有人归纳了外刊论文撰写的五个基本要求，即5C：正确（correctness）、清楚（clarity）、简洁（concision）、完整（completion）和一致性（consistency）。

SCI投稿信件的一些套话和模板(From Internet)一、投稿信1. Dear Dr. Defendi ML:I am sending a manuscript. entitled “” by – which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - .Yours sincerely2. Dear Dr. A:Enclosed is a manuscript. entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers.3. Dear Dr. A:Please find enclosed for your review an original researc h article, “” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.二、询问有无收到稿件Dear Editors,We dispatched our manuscript. to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript,again. Thank you in advance for your help.三、询问论文审查回音Dear Editors，It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript. (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.四、关于论文的总体审查意见1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest.A few minor revision are list below.2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as –4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.5. This manuscript. is not suitable for publication in the journal of –because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.8. The wording and style. of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?五、给编辑的回信1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission.3. Thank you for your letter of –and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript. entitled “”. We have studie d their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval.4. I enclosed a revised manuscript. which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original findings are confirmed.5. We are sending the revised manuscript. according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript.7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript. is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in Table 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account.10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper.11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments concerni ng Figures 1 and 2 result froma misinterpretation of the data.12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available.13. We prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the cells, we consider it essential.15. The running title has been changed to “”.16. The Materials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope and assaying hexokinase.17. The concentration of HAT media (page12 paragraph 2) was incorrectly stated in the original manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors are grateful to the referees for pointing out their error.18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of the possibility of laser action on chromosome has been included (page16, paragraph 2).19. We included a new set of photographs with better definition than those originally submitted and to which a scale has been added.20. Following the suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure 3 and 4.21. Two further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text and Reference section. These are:22. We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have now produced a more balance and better account of our work. We trust that the revised manuscript. is acceptable for publication.23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript. is now suitable for publication.24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to improve our paper.25. I apologize for the delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing an additional experiment, as suggested by referees.。

SCI投稿References模板引用格式在SCI投稿中，参考文献的引用格式通常遵循国际通用的APA格式（American Psychological Association）。

下面是一个引用的示例：- 单一作者：Smith, J. （年份）. 文章标题. 期刊名称，卷号（期号），页码范围.- 多位作者：Smith, J., & Johnson, A. （年份）. 文章标题. 期刊名称，卷号（期号），页码范围.- 书籍：Smith, J. （年份）. 书名. 出版地：出版社.参考文献模板参考文献的模板应包括作者、文章或书籍标题、期刊名称（或书籍出版信息）、卷号（期号）、页码范围等关键信息。

下面是一个参考文献模板的示例：作者. (年份). 文章标题. 期刊名称, 卷号(期号), 页码范围. DOI （如果适用）.例如：Smith, J. (2022). How to write a successful SCI paper. Journal of Science, 10(2), 100-120. DOI: .注意事项在引用参考文献时，请确保以下事项：- 检查每个作者的姓名的拼写和顺序是否准确。

- 在引用页码范围时，在起始页码和结束页码之间使用短划线，例如：100-120。

- 对于期刊文章，请提供卷号和期号的信息。

- 对于文章或书籍，请提供适当的出版信息。

请根据上述模板和注意事项准确地引用SCI投稿中的参考文献，以确保你的论文符合SCI投稿要求和规范。

记住，在引用任何内容之前，请始终确认所引用内容的准确性和可靠性。

---感谢阅读本文档，希望对你提交SCI投稿时的参考文献编写有所帮助！。

SCI投稿信模板作者: xiaowuhehe 收录日期: 2010-06-04 发布日期: 2010-05-25SCI 投稿全过程信件模板一览（出处不详，仅供参考）：一、最初投稿Cover letterDear Editors:We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.In this work, we evaluated …… (简要介绍一下论文的创新性). I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”.The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:1) Name A E-mail: ××××@××××2) Name B E-mail: ××××@××××We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me at the address below.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××二、催稿信Dear Prof. ×××:Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号), although the status of “With Editor” has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to reviewers or not?I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am very pleased to hear from you on th e reviewer’s comments.Thank you very much for your consideration.Best regards!Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××三、修改稿Cover letterDear Dr/ Prof..（写上负责你文章编辑的姓名，显得尊重，因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑，只能用通用的Editors）:On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号).We have studied reviewer’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration. We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××四、修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the pap er and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:Responds to the reviewer’s comments:Reviewer #1:1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××。

国外SCI投稿常识2010世界六大检索系统：美国《科学文献索引》（SCI）美国《工程索引》（EI）美国《化学文摘》（CA）英国《科学文摘》（SA）日本科技文献速报（CBST）俄罗斯《文摘杂志》（PЖ[AJ]）SCI 影响因子排名ISI IF Ranking：美国科技信息协会Institute for Scientific Information（ISI）对世界7831种专业杂志提供的影响因子Impact Factor (IF）排名, 包括：1）SCI IF 年度排名Annual Ranking2）学科内排名Journal Ranking Within Discipline （IRK ）：满分= 13）1971-2002 ISI 杂志影响因子平均分Average Journal Impact Factor over all years of ISI quotation（JIF ）中国进入以上检索系统的生物医学杂志：●《中华医学杂志(英文版)》中华医学会Chinese Medical Journal●《中国药理学报》中国药理学会Acta Pharmacologica Sinica●《生物医学与环境科学》中国疾病预防控制中心Biomedical And Environmental Science●《生理学报》中国生理学会中国科学院上海生理研究所Chinese Journal Of Physiology●《中国科学C-生命科学》中国科学院Science In China Series C-Life Science与国外SCI杂志比较：NEW ENGL J MED 1.0 20.08 新英格兰内科杂志（美，1831）LANCET 0.99 12.32柳叶刀（英，1823）CHINESE MED J –PEKING中华医学杂志0.12 0.14NATURE 1.0 20.68 自然（英，1869）SCIENCE 0.99 14.68科学（美，1880）CHINESE SCIENCE BULL 中国科学通报（中科院，1950）0.50 0.20成功关键：Pathways to success●创新点originality●语言Language医学科研论文的基本结构与要求：1．标题Title2．摘要Abstract3．引言Introduction4．材料与方法Materials and Methods 5．结论Results6．讨论Discussion7．致谢Acknowledgements8．参考文献References医学科研论文的结构与要求：9．插图说明Figure legends 10．插图Figures11．表格Tables12．照片和说明Plates and explanations1. 引言Introduction●背景–说明研究问题的目前总体情况或历史●意义–说明研究的意义或必要性●进展–说明先有发现、报告或研究●目的–说明本研究的目的●范围–说明要研究问题的具体范围2. 材料与方法Materialsand Methods●研究设计（study design）→●研究对象性质（identity）→●处理/ 干预方法（intervention）→●测定/ 观察手段（measurement）→●统计分析（statistics）材料与方法部分的法律、伦理问题：•知情同意Informed consent•伦理委员会Ethics committee •动物保护Animal protection3. 结果Results让研究的客观结果说话，不要添枝加叶Let your results speak for themselves and don’t embellish4. 讨论Discussion•简要说明研究背景background•简要介绍总的发现general findings•介绍具体要点introduction of points•与先有发现（若有）进行比较comparison in the context of other studies•意义suggested meaning•结论conclusion•前瞻研究future studies5.致谢Acknowledgements•致谢词和致谢方式必须征得受谢人或单位的同意6. 参考文献References•按各杂志具体要求7. 插图说明Figure legends•插图另页双行打印Type out legends for illustrations ▲using double spacing▲starting on a separate page8. 图表Figures and Tables•插图要按杂志的版面大小比例进行压缩；不要把插图拍成照片Design your figures for the appropriate reduction投稿文件排列顺序：•1. 附信（给编辑部的信）Cover letter •2. 标题页Title page•3. 摘要页Abstract page•4. 正文(无姓名、单位、地址）Body •5. 图表说明Figure legends•6. 图表Figures and Tables1. 附信Cover letter / letter to the editors1）投稿愿望(greetings)2）本研究或发现的意义(significance of the new finding)3）对内容重复问题（redundancy），病人隐私权问题（privacy），知情同意问题（informed consent）及其他需要说明的问题加以说明5) 对研究成果可能引起的利益冲突（interest conflict）或法律纠纷(legal liability) 问题，如多中心研究的成果归属问题，与资助单位的利益分配问题，加以说明6）所有作者的签名(signature)，超过25个作者时，签名到第25个作者7）其他要说明的问题8）写信人，即通讯作者（corresponding author）的详细地址和联系方式，包括电话、传真和E-mail复信示例A cover letterDear Editors:Would you please kindly accept our manuscript entitled Discrete effects of cardiac norepinephrine on post-ischemic myocardial dysfunction in hypertensive rats?【投稿愿望】We think that the most interesting result of this study is that different degrees of cardiac norepienphrine reduction in hypertrophied hearts led to quite different patterns of recovery in posat-ischemic heart function. Since reduction of cardiac norephrine with reserpine did not result in depressed myocardial contractility, it is of potential importance when such interference is utilized to deter further dysfunction in hearts during ischemia.【本研究的意义】Parts of the present results were presented at the 11th Japan-China Joint Meeting on Pharmacology held in China on 25-27 Aug. 2000 and will be published in the form of abstract in the journal Acta Pharmacologica Sinica by the end of thisyear. Here enclosed are three copies of the abstract submitted to Acta Pharmacologica Sinica. The present work is not currently under consideration for publication elsewhere.【对内容重复等问题加以说明】Thank you very muchSincerely yours,CHEN Hong, MD, PhD(signature)2. 标题页Title page根据URMSBJ要求，论文标题及有关著录内容应单独双行打印，称为“标题页”（Title page），放在附信(cover letter) 之后、摘要页(abstract page) 之前，其内容包括：标题页Title page1)标题（Title of the article）1)所有作者的姓名及其最高学位、所属单位（name of each author,thehighest academic degree andinstitutional affiliation）标题页Title page3) 弃权者（若有）（disclaimers, if any）4) 研究工作的归属部门或单位名称（the name of the department and institution to which the work should be attributed）标题页Title page5) 负责通讯和校稿作者的姓名和详细地址（the name and address of the author responsible for correspondence and proof about the manuscript）标题页Title page6) 申请副本联系人姓名和地址（the name and address of the author to whom requests for reprints (offprint) should be addressed）；Offprints are not offered free of charge!标题页Title page7) 不超过40个字母（包括间隔）的页眉标题（a short running head of no more than 40 letters and spaces at the foot of the title page）标题页Title page8) 资助、设备、药品来源（sources of support in the form of grants, equipment, drugs, or all of these）标题页示例•TITLE PAGE•Article titleEnhancement of fractionated bone marrow transplantation on hematopoietic cell homing in a mice allogeneic model1Yingsong Xiang1, Suping Sun1, Jianming Cai1, Mingfeng Xiang2, Gusheng Tang1 and Xuetao Cao31 Department of Radiation & Nuclear Medicine, Second Military Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Road, Shanghai 200433, P.R.China. 2Department of Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical University, Nanchang 331400, P. R. China. 3 Department of Immunology, Second Military Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Road, Shanghai 200433, P.R.China.•Keywords:hematopoietic stem cells, apoptosis, transplantation, stem cell homing.•Running Head: Bone marrow transplantation•Word Count: Abstract: 218; Text: 3279•Address for Correspondence: Yingsong Xiang, Department of Radiation Medicine, Second Military Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Road, Shanghai 200433 P.R. China. Tel: (+86 21) 25070357, FAX: (+86 21) 2507 0356. E-mail: lh6549@•Footnotes1 Supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (39600077 and 39770329) and the National HighBiotechnology Foundation of China (Z200103).•AbbreviationsAllo-, allogeneic; BM, bone marrow; BMC, bone marrow cells; BMT, bone marrow transplantation; CFC, colony forming cells; CFU, colony forming units; Fr-BMT, fractionated bone marrow transplantation; HSC, hematopoietic stem cells; Syn-, syngeneic; UCB, umbilical cord blood.3.摘要页Abstract page•1. 论文标题Title•2. 论文摘要Abstract•3. 关键词key / indexing words4.打印与投稿Print and submission网上投稿E-mail邮递投稿Hard copy by post1）A4 纸2）四周空2.5cm边3）双行打印double spacing4）硬信封hard envelope5）付款payment5. 修稿时限•1个月：按时发表•2个月：择期发表•3个月：重新审稿6.投稿常用术语•Corresponding/correspondence author：通讯作者，负责联系出版、校稿事宜的作者•author for copy requests：副本索取作者•academic degree：学位，如M.D., Ph.D., RN •academic title：职称，如教授（full professor），副教授（associate professor），教授助理（assistant professor），职称不能作论文署名用• a cover letter/letter to the editors：附信• a running head / title：页眉标题，约5个英文单词投稿常用术语•legends：插图说明，应与插图分开，另页打印•unmounted prints：不加装帧的照片•hard copy: 硬文本，即打印或复印文本，按编辑部要求提供印数•double spacing：双行（打印），即送审的英文稿件要以空两行的格式打印•prime reviewer / referee：初审者，即负责稿件初审的专家，一般3-5人copyright transfer：版权转让：一般来说，稿件被接受的同时，其版权同时转让给了该杂志投稿常用术语•authorship：著作权，参加研究的所有作者，包括没有署名的作者，都具有著作权•authorship responsibility：作者责任，有两层意思：1）作者必须是参加研究或部分研究的人，对所作研究是知情的；2）作者必须对所做的研究负责•patients’rights to privacy：病人隐私权•informed consent：知情同意（书），在进行新药，新技术、新方法的研究时，必须将研究的有关事宜告诉病人并经病人的同意，在论文中必须对此有专门说明THANK YOU。

SCI投稿Introduction模板引言
写作引言是SCI投稿的关键部分之一。

引言应该简洁明了，准确地介绍研究的背景、目的和意义，并引导读者进入论文的主题。

本文提供了一个SCI投稿Introduction模板，帮助作者开始撰写引言部分。

模板结构
第一段：引入研究领域和问题
在第一段，引言应该提供研究领域的背景，并引出你的研究问题。

下面是一个示例句子：
> [研究领域的背景] 过去几十年来，[研究领域] 已经受到广泛关注，其中一个关键问题是 [研究问题]。

第二段：研究目的和意义
第二段应该明确说明你的研究目的和意义。

下面是一个示例句子：
> 本研究的目的是 [研究目的]，这一研究对 [研究领域] 的发展和应用具有重要意义。

第三段：研究方法和数据来源
第三段应简要介绍你的研究方法和数据来源。

下面是一个示例句子：
> 本研究采用了 [研究方法] 来 [研究问题]，数据来自 [数据来源]。

第四段：预期结果和贡献
第四段应描述你对研究结果的预期，并强调你的研究可能对学术界和实践产生的贡献。

下面是一个示例句子：
> 本研究预计将得出 [预期结果]，这将进一步增加对 [研究领域] 的理解，并为 [实践领域] 提供有益的指导。

总结
以上是一个SCI投稿Introduction模板的示例。

通过在引言中准确而简洁地介绍研究的背景、目的、方法和预期结果，读者可以更好地理解你的研究，并为你的研究做出评估。

SCI收录期刊英文投稿全过程英文信件模板一览一、最初投稿Cover letterDear Editors:We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interestexits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.In this work, we evaluated …… (简要介绍一下论文的创新性). I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”.The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:1) Name A E-mail: ××××@××××2) Name B E-mail: ××××@××××We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me at the address below.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××二、催稿信Dear Prof. ×××:Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号), although the status of “With Editor” has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to reviewers or not?I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am very pleased to hear from you on the reviewer’s comments.Thank you very much for your consideration.Best regards!Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××三、修改稿Cover letterDear Dr/ Prof..（写上负责你文章编辑的姓名，显得尊重，因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑，只能用通用的Editors）:On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号).We have studied reviewer’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××四、修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:Responds to the reviewer’s comments:Reviewer #1:1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××。

一、最初投稿Cover letterDear Editors:We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.In this work, we evaluated ……(简要介绍一下论文的创新性). I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”.The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:1) Name A E-mail: ××××@××××2) Name B E-mail: ××××@××××We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me at the address below.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××二、催稿信Dear Prof. ×××:Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号), although the status of “With Editor”has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to reviewers or not?I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am very pleased to hear from you on the reviewer’s comments.Thank you very much for your consideration.Best regards!Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××三、修改稿Cover letterDear Dr/ Prof..（写上负责你文章编辑的姓名，显得尊重，因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑，只能用通用的Editors）:On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号).We have studied reviewer’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××四、修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”(ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:Responds to the reviewer’s comments:Reviewer #1:1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××。

scientific reports 投稿模板全文共四篇示例，供读者参考第一篇示例：科学研究报告（Scientific Reports）是一家国际性的开放获取期刊，涵盖了各个科学领域的研究成果。

如果你准备向Scientific Reports投稿，那么你需要按照他们的投稿模板来准备和撰写你的研究报告。

以下是一个关于Scientific Reports投稿模板的指南，希望能够对你有所帮助。

1. 标题在你的研究报告中，你需要创造一个具有吸引力且能够准确反映你研究主题的标题。

标题应该简明扼要，概括你研究的要点，吸引读者的兴趣。

在Scientific Reports中，标题应该尽量避免使用专业术语或缩写，以便更容易被广大读者理解。

2. 摘要接下来是撰写摘要部分。

在这一部分，你需要简要介绍你的研究目的、方法、结果和结论。

摘要应该具有逻辑性，语言简洁明了，让读者能够快速了解你的研究内容和主要发现。

在Scientific Reports中，摘要通常不超过250字。

3. 引言在你需要介绍研究的背景、目的和意义。

你应该指出你的研究填补了什么知识空白，解决了什么问题，并对你的研究做出科学价值的解释。

确保引言部分清晰明了，逻辑性强，让读者对你的研究感兴趣。

4. 方法在方法部分，你需要详细描述你的研究设计、实验流程、数据采集和分析方法。

确保你的方法描述清晰明了，让读者理解你的研究方法，并能够重复你的实验。

在Scientific Reports中，方法部分应该尽量避免使用专业术语，以便更广泛的读者能够理解。

5. 结果在结果部分，你需要呈现你的研究结果，包括数据、图表和统计分析。

确保你的结果呈现清晰、准确，表达方式简洁明了，能够有效地展示你的研究成果。

在Scientific Reports中，结果部分通常采用图表和表格来辅助说明。

6. 讨论在讨论部分，你需要对研究结果进行解释和分析，探讨其科学意义，并与前人研究进行比较。

确保你的讨论部分论证严谨，结论清晰，对你研究的价值和局限性有充分的认识。

以下是英文投稿过程中的十种状态和需要注意的问题：1. Submitted to Journal当上传结束后，显示的状态是Submitted to Journal，这个状态是自然形成的无需处理。

2. With editor如果在投稿的时候没有要求选择编辑，就先到主编那里，主编会分派给别的编辑。

这当中就会有另两个状态：①Editor assigned编辑分派②Editor Declined Invitation编辑拒绝邀请，这时主编不得不将投稿文章重新分派给其它编辑。

3. Reviewer(s) invited说明编辑已接手处理，正在邀请审稿人中。

有时该过程会持续很长时间，如果其中原因是编辑一直没有找到合适的审稿人，这时投稿者可以向编辑推荐审稿人。

4. Under review审稿人的意见已上传，说明审稿人已接受审稿，正在审稿中，这应该是一个漫长的等待（期刊通常会限定审稿人审稿时间，一般为一个月左右）。

当然前面各步骤也可能很慢的，要看编辑的处理情况。

如果被邀请审稿人不想审，就会decline，编辑会重新邀请别的审稿人。

5. required review completed审稿结束，等编辑处理，该过程短则几天，长则无期，科学堂有一篇文章出现required review completed状态已近一个月了，还是没有消息。

6. Decision in Process到了这一步就快要有结果了，编辑开始考虑是给修改还是直接拒，当然也有可能直接接受的，但可能性很小，呵呵。

7. Minor revision/Major revision小修/大修，这个时候可以稍微庆祝一下了，因为有修改就有可能。

具体怎么改就不多说了，谦虚谨慎是不可少的（因为修改后一般会再发给审稿人看，所以一定要细心的回答每一个审稿人的每一个问题，态度要谦逊，要让审稿人觉得他提的每个问题都很有水准的，然后针对他的问题，一个一个的做出答复，能修改的就修改，不能修改的给出理由，而且都要列出来，文章的哪一段哪一行修改了最好都说出来，记住：给审稿人减少麻烦就是给你自己减少麻烦！另注：有时，审稿人会在修改意见里隐讳里说出要你仔细阅读某几篇文献，这时可要注意了，其中某些文章可能就是评审者自己发表的，这时你最好在你的修改稿中加以引用），修改后被拒绝的例子也多不胜数的。

sci杂志催稿模板
尊敬的作者：
您好！感谢您选择《Science》杂志投稿。

我们很高兴能够看到您对我们杂志的兴趣，并期待能够收到您的优质投稿。

鉴于您的研究领域与《Science》杂志的定位相符，我们诚挚邀请您就以下主题向我们提交您的原创研究成果：
1. 基础科学研究。

2. 应用科学与工程技术。

3. 生命科学与医学。

4. 地球科学与环境科学。

5. 社会科学与人文科学。

请您在投稿时务必遵循以下要求：
1. 投稿内容必须为原创，未在其他期刊或平台发表过。

2. 投稿稿件应具有较高的学术和实践价值，能够引起读者的兴趣。

3. 投稿内容应符合《Science》杂志的学术定位，具有较高的
学术水平和创新性。

4. 投稿时请提供完整的作者信息、单位信息以及联系方式，以
便我们与您取得及时联系。

在收到您的投稿后，我们将安排专业编辑进行审稿。

审稿周期
一般为4-6周，期间我们会及时与您保持联络，直至最终稿件决定。

再次感谢您选择《Science》杂志投稿，期待您的精彩投稿！
祝好！
《Science》编辑部敬上。

sci投稿proposal模板
投稿SCI期刊的proposal模板通常包括以下几个部分：
1. 标题，提出清晰而具体的研究题目，突出研究的重要性和创新性。

2. 背景和意义，简要介绍研究领域的现状和存在的问题，阐明研究的意义和价值。

3. 目的和研究问题，阐明研究的目的和要解决的具体问题，明确研究的核心内容。

4. 方法和技术路线，详细描述研究所采用的方法、实验设计和技术路线，确保评审人能够理解研究的可行性和可靠性。

5. 预期结果和创新点，说明研究预期的结果，并突出研究的创新点和突破性。

6. 参考文献，列出相关的参考文献，支撑研究的理论基础和前沿动态。

在撰写proposal时，需要注意清晰、简洁地表达研究的核心内
容和创新点，避免使用过于复杂的术语和句式，以确保评审人能够
准确理解并评估你的研究计划。

同时，注意格式规范和语言流畅，
确保proposal的逻辑严谨、条理清晰。

希望这个模板能够帮助到你，如果有其他方面的需求，也欢迎继续向我提问。

一、投稿时的Cover latter1). Here within enclosed is our paper for consideration to be published on "(Journal name)". The further information about the paper is in the following:The Title: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXThe Authors: XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXXXThe authors claim that none of the material in the paper has been published or is under consideration for publication elsewhere.I am the corresponding author and my address and other information is as follows: Address: Department of XXXXXXXXX,College of Chemistry and Enviromental Science, Henan Normal UniversityXinxiang City, Henan Province, 453007,P.R.ChinaE-mail:Tel: +86-XXX-XXXXXXXFax: +86-XXX-XXXXXXXThank you very much for consideration!Sincerely Yours,Dr. XXX2). Dear Dr. A:I am sending a manuscript entitled “” by – which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - .Yours sincerely3). Dear Dr. A:Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers.4). Dear Dr. A:Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, “” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.二、询问有无收到稿件Dear Editors,We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help.三、询问论文审查回音Dear Editors，It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.四、关于论文的总体审查意见1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as –4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of – because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?五、给编辑的回信1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission.3. Thank you for your letter of – and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript entitled “”. We have studied their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval.4. I enclosed a revised manuscript which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original findings are confirmed.5. We are sending the revised manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in Table 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account.10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper.11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments concerning Figures 1 and 2 result from a misinterpretation of the data.12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available.13. We prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the cells, we consider it essential.15. The running title has been changed to “”.16. The Materials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope and assaying hexokinase.17. The concentration of HAT media (page12 paragraph 2) was incorrectly stated in the original manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors are grateful to the referees for pointing out their error.18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of the possibility of laser action on chromosome has been included (page16, paragraph 2).19. We included a new set of photographs with better definition than those originally submitted and to which a scale has been added.20. Following the suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure 3 and 4.21. Two further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text and Reference section. These are:22. We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have now produced a more balance and better account of our work. We trust that the revised manuscript is acceptable for publication.23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript is now suitable for publication.24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to improve our paper.25. I apologize for the delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing an additional experiment, as suggested by referees--SCI期刊投稿状态投稿术语名词解释blog.sina../s/blog_6763380d01013buh.html1. Submitted to Journal 刚提交的状态2. Manuscript received by Editorial Office 就是你的文章到了编辑手里了，证明投稿成功3. With editor 如果在投稿的时候没有要求选择编辑，就先到主编那，主编会分派给别的编辑。