GRE写作的黄金定律GRE写作的黄金定律新GRE写作定律之一:清晰文章的清晰体现在读者能够很容易理解作者讲述的内容.为保证所写文章清晰明了,写作时有两点一定要加以注意:一是越确切具体越好.在这一方面,作者首先应明确了解自己所要传达的信息.读者的范围及特点,然后再选择相关信息,采用某种文体格式传递给读者.也就是说,写作必须要以特定读者为对象,以让读者能够明确接受作者所传递的信息为宗旨.尽量以客观陈述为主,少主观臆测推断;尽量明确无误表达,少模棱两可评论,这是使文章清晰确切的写作准则.二是组织结构富有逻辑性.文章结构富逻辑性会让读者很轻松地读懂作者要表达的思想内容.文章的这种逻辑性可以通过采用从一般到具体.从〝全景〞到细节.从问题的定义到分析再到提出解决方案等多种方式来体现.新GRE写作定律之二:准确要使文章语义表达准确,首先要尽量不要在学术文章中出现〝大概.也许〞之类模棱两可的词语,避免出现容易让人困惑和误解的词语和表达法;其次,要尽量避免使用那些有多种含义的词语和表达法.例如:Singaporeis a finecountry这句话中的fine一词有多种含义,如〝好的.细小的.罚款〞等.日常生活中这样使用没有问题,但在写作时一定要避免使用这种容易产生歧义的多义词.新GRE写作定律之三:简洁直截了当.切中要点是保证文章简洁的最好写作形式.与中文写作相比,英文写作非常强调直奔主题.简单明快的写作风格.例如,在写作一个段落时,常常将概括段落主要内容的主题句(topicsentence)作为段落的首句,以便让读者迅速明确本段要讲述的内容.另外,写作时尽量将每个句子写得简短一些,少用或不用冗长的复合句.切记:短小精练的句子表达的意思才强而有力.GRE issue写作优秀实例:技术进步之社会影响题目:Technologies not only influence but actually determine social customs andethics.技术不仅仅影响而且实际上是决定了社会传统和道德规范.正文:Taking a brief glance at history of human e_istence, it is not difficult todraw the conclusion that technology, defined as the application of science andknowledge, has played an important role in bringing transformation andimprovement to society. I agree with the above saying in the topic thattechnology should be regarded as a determinative factor which not onlyinfluences but also, and more importantly,determines the social custom andethics.People, generally speaking, would not doubt the perspective thattechnologye_ercises enormous influence on the custom and ethics of mankind. Before theIndustrial Revolution, women in Britain were not allowed to work outside apartfrom some comparatively enlightened places; yet waves of women went intospinneries as cotton spinner after the jenny were universally utilized aroundEurope. The reason why factories preferred women rather than men in theIndustrial Revolution lies in the development of technology, which decreased thephysical weakness of women, raised the social awareness of the advantage ofwomen worker such as more carefulness and patience, changed the traditionalindustrial configuration in the proportion of females and males, thereforetransformed the cliche ban of women s outside working. Same analysis could beapplied on feminism campaign. With the purpose of se_ual equality andpersonality liberation, feminism campaign is based on the development and betterment of the equipment from this point of view. In a word, all thesechanges in social custom and ethics owe to the development of technology. But why, someone may ask, should technology be mentioned as the determinatefactor,not merely an infective ingredient? The answer comes from the differencebetween quantity of effects that influence and determination separately raise.As dictionary refers, the effect of influence is indirect and comparatively weaker; while that of determination is direct, basic and strong. From thee_amples given in the above paragraph, agreement may not be difficult to reachthat the impact of technology on social custom is direct and enormous. Withouttechnology in medical, people today might still hold the belief that spread ofplague is the punishment from God and the sick are unforgivable sinners; inindustry, the popular concept of global village and the social consciousness ofracial equality might never e_ist; in sociology, women cannot get theopportunity to realize their own values as an independent individual throughworking. To sum up, technology is the determinative factor to change the socialcustom and ethics.However, question may still be raised why it is the technology determinesthe social custom and ethics, rather than human beings or other factors.Admittedly, it seems much more of sense that human beings make the social customand ethics by themselves. But it does not imply that human beings determine thetrend of social custom, since the formation of a social custom and a principleof ethics is based on the level of technology at that time by which majority ofpeople can measure what can be done while others cannot. Admittedly, often humanactivities such as Renaissance and World War 2 seem to influence the socialcustom more obviously and to a greater e_tent than technology does. But whenconsidering why such activities happened on a specific time in a specific place,one still have to turn to technology for further understanding. Thus, the socialcustom actually should be regarded as fruits, if the human activities are takenas trunk; technology should be considered as the roots of the tree whichdetermine whether the tree can live and what it can produce.In fact, social custom and ethics feed back with the development oftechnology,resulting in either promotion or restriction. For an instance,acquirement for longer life nowadays is an increasingly popular social custom.This challenges the medical technology at present, thus stimulates theresearchers to speed up their discovery for new medical treatment. Humancloning, for another instance, is legally abandoned in many countries due to thediscordance with the ethnics of society today. Therefore the further developmentof cloning technology in many countries almost halts. The influence of socialcustom and ethics on technology cannot be ignored.In conclusion, this issue asserts that the technology influences the socialcustom and ethics so markedly that can be regarded as a determinative factor.Meanwhile, the social custom and ethics can reflect feedback toward technology.Technology can be metaphorized into a flowing river, while the social custom andethics into the banks, on which preserves human civilization and cultures. Theriver determines the position of banks; while the banks control the direction offlow.GRE issue写作优秀实例:国家领土题目:Government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their naturalstate, even though these areas are often e_tremely remote and thus accessible toonly a few people.政府应该保留国家领土中公共拥有的荒凉地区,即使这些地区往往人迹罕至.正文:Conflicts between prolonging human e_istence and solving current societalproblem lie in governmental issues consistently. In order to keep biologicaldiversity and natural balance, it places emphasis on environmental preservationwhich includes issues on wilderness areas. Insofar as protecting such areaspermits a more comfortable survival of offspring I concede the necessity ofpreservation. However, when the nation is short of economical and politicalself-sufficient ability and current issues abound in number, government wouldset higher priority to at hand problems.Preservation of wilderness areas conducted by government assures aneffective method of providing descendants access to comfortable prospectivenature system.Creatures, directly or indirectly instrumental for people, suffered from an escalated scale of e_tinction as a result of humanindustrialization. Moreover, along with rapidly accruing population, startlingdeveloping technologies and, perhaps most important of all, continuouslyinflating human desire the size and amounts of such areas shrank gravely overperiods. Gradually appearing phenomena revealed threats of disastrousconsequences tomorrow. Scarcity of plants with photosynthesis mechanism increaseCO2 in atmosphere and therefore resulting in global warming trends which moltensea ice to water and has inundated some of the territory, for e_ample. Awarenessof some people in the leading position calls for governmental policies that protect environment from being e_cessively trampled by human behavior. Toprotect wilderness areas by forces of government is one of the available andeffective measures. Creatures there could afford a free landscape and securesurrounding to grow and rear offspring.Possibly, certain kinds of rare specieswould be preserved from e_tinction.However, a government takes responsibilities not primarily for the moral justice but for well-being of populace and strength of the nation as a whole.Once the protection of such areas require too much economical or personnelsupport, the priority needs confirmation. Resources of any government arelimited, and deficit occurs frequently even if it places little emphasis on suchrelatively marginal issues. This does not entail eschewing from accountabilityfor destiny of prospective citizens or human beings altogether. It means concernfor being responsible for its living residents to guarantee the advent ofprospective society. Can a population which suffered and is suffering from massstarvation, unemployment and destructive warfare but focused on symbiosisrelationship with other species e_ist long? In this sense, human needs to besomewhat selfish rather than completely generous at the risk of selfsacrificing.Granted that preservation of wilderness areas validate in allowingbiological diversity and better natural environmental situation for our progeny,it is likely that we can not satisfy them in light of the decline in humanevolution. Had our predecessors intensively focused in preservation anddistributed much more financial budgets to these areas rather than they dide_ploit Alaska for petroleum, we would not reproduce so many instruments thatfacilitate us in daily life and communication and make realization of geneticstructure in ourselves possible. Such case holds true to whom live after us.Although by concentrating more on technological and economical development harmsenvironment in future, we may have worked out solutions such as cloningdisappeared species, recreating adaptable climate and colonizing to otherplanets. After all, purposes of all policies, no matter protecting theenvironment or reinforcing economical and technological strength, serveultimately to the well-being of human.To an e_treme e_tent, without effective resorts to reduce the birth rate,which means persistent enlarging of population, government may take measurese_ploiting such areas for residence rather than preserve them originallylooking. After all, it would be nonsense to afford others benefits until wesubstantiated ourselves. Admittedly, wild animals and plants are there to stayand compete much less than they did, and such behavior robbing their lastresidence could be regarded as cruel. Yet, we may distinguish which is cruelercomparing with depriving the right of survival from our fellow. The nature hadperformed its principle: the one who adapt less will be eliminated.In summary, we have moral responsibility to preserve wilderness areas for abrighter future and circumstance for our descendents. However, sometimesgovernment has to lay down such idea in order to avoid jeopardize in domestic crisis. In addition, once needed, to meet the needs for survival of itscitizens, the government ought to make alternatives of e_ploiting rather thanpreservation.高分GRE写作提纲举例指导整合高分GRE写作提纲举例指导,我们来学习一下吧,下面小编就和大家分享,来欣赏一下吧.新gre考试作文新题库解析issue 新gre考试作文新题库解析issue1,快来一起学习吧.下面小编就和大家分享,来欣赏一下吧如何规划GRE作文备考如何规划GRE作文备考,我们来学习一下吧,下面小编就和大家分享,来欣赏一下吧.GRE作GREargument应如何进行有效分析今天小编带来了GRE argument应如何进行有效分析,我们一起来看看吧,下面小编就和大家分。
