英语辩论-安乐死合法化

Topic: Euthanasia should be legalized.Tagore once said: let life be beautiful like summer flowers, and death like autumn leaves. Death should not be a process which is passive, desperate, filled with endless suffering instead it could be active, peaceful and decent. Euthanasia grants those who struggle with terminal illness or incurable morbidity merciful death, reflecting respect for autonomy of life. According to the modern medical ethics, social morality and the fundamental spirit of the criminal law and the constitution, therefore we have reasons to believe that euthanasia is reasonable and should be legalized from the perspective of philosophy, ethics and law. (97)Firstly, euthanasia is beneficial to those who suffer from fatal illness from a philosophical perspective. As we know, it is the degree of happiness rather than the length of life that embodies the life value. Obviously, euthanasia is a wiser and happier choice compared with living in long-term anguish, helplessness and mortal fear. Furthermore, people enjoy the right to live as well as the right to die, so the legalization of the euthanasia reflects respect for people’s life, personality and dignity.(81)Besides philosophical rationality, euthanasia also conforms to the modern medical ethics and social ethics. Bacon once said：A doctor's duty is not only to cure diseases of the patients, but also to alleviate their suffering and sorrow. For the hopeless patients, advanced medical technologies just delay the breakdown, prolongingphysical and mental suffering of them, increasing the psychological and economic burden of their family, squandering pharmaceutical resources of our society, in some way, violating the modern medical ethics and social ethics. (82)The main focus of euthanasia controversy should rests on whether it constitute a crime or not，not on its philosophical or ethical rationality. In my opinion, the implementation of euthanasia does not violate criminal policy. Firstly, the essence of crime is its serious harm to our society. Obviously, euthanasia isn’t harmful to our society. By contrast, it benefits our society for saving pharmaceutical resources. Moreover, the purpose of legislation is to maintain the social order and ensure the normal life of the citizens so punishment about euthanasia is unnecessary. (90)。

安乐死_英语作文（优秀范文五篇）第一篇：安乐死_英语作文The euthanasia The fast advance of medicine and life–extending technologies enable life to be prolonged.The euthanasia has been becoming the hot topic around the world, and questioned discussion about its legalization occurs at home and abroad.In my opinion, the euthanasia is mercy.It can help hopeless ill patients to dead qucikly，relieve them from the pain , For these people，the quality of life is the foundation value of life.For these patients who can never be cured, death is unavoidable to them, so the euthanasia is the best way to let them away from great pain.And these patients have to suffer from the pain, at the same time, their family members have to stand the expensive medical expenses and the great hurt mentally，“We mustn't delay any longer … swallowing is difficult … and breathing, that's also difficult.Those muscles are weakening too … we mustn't delay any longer.”the words from a Dutchman asked his doctor to help him die.At that time ,he was no longer able to speak clearly and he knew there was no hope of recovery and that his condition was rapidly get worse.Therefore,it's merciful for the doctors to help these patience come to an end of their life with the euthanasia.In addition, to reduce the pain of the patients is one of the doctors' duty, so euthanasia.is moral.To be frank, everyone has the right and freedom to manage their own final destiny, such as refuse any cure.And thus right also includes the freedom of choosing to die as well as the ways of death, even when it's necessary to ask somebody else to end their life.In a word.I want to call on the legitimization of the euthanasia.let the patients get rid of thestruggle between life and death as soon as possible.第二篇：英语作文：安乐死（1）有利于病人的自身利益。

高考英语作文：Should Euthanasia Be Legalize高考英语作文：Should Euthanasia Be Legalized_安乐死应该合法化吗在生活、工作和学习中，说到作文，大家肯定都不陌生吧，借助作文可以提高我们的`语言组织能力。

你知道作文怎样才能写的好吗？以下是小编收集整理的高考英语作文：Should Euthanasia Be Legalized_安乐死应该合法化吗，仅供参考，欢迎大家阅读。

Euthanasia, a quiet and easy death, or “mercy killing” as we call it recently has made theheadlines frequently. Many people applaud it and argue that euthanasia should be legalized.As is pointed out, to practise euthanasia can benefit both the patient and his family. To aterminally ill person who is suffering excruciating pains day and night or living “like a vegetable”, to be allowed to end his life painlessly is a good release. To his family it is also a big relief considering the financial and emotional drain on them that having to sustain his lifeentails. However, the legalization of euthanasia may also bring with it problems our society has not previously faced. Is it humane, for example, that a terminally ill patient is thus caused to feelguilty for remaining alive because he does not want to die? Is it wise that a patient is killed alive simply because of a mistaken terminal diagnosis? And is it possible that euthanasia could be taken advantage of for some ulterior or even criminal purposes?Since the legalization of euthanasia will raise serious moral and social issues, the decision our society makes about euthanasia will undoubtedly have tremendous consequences in society.。

安乐死_英语辩论第一篇：安乐死_英语辩论(!)Euthanasia is to kill people.Life is so important for every one.People don’t only live for themselves, but they also live for their families and the society.If they choose to leave the world, they are not responsible for themselves, their families and the society.Euthanasia is disparagement of life.Life is so precious.Patients should cherish their life.They should try their best to prevail incurable disease.Everyone should show basic respect for life.No matter what happens, we should face up to the facts, we should live on with great courage, we should believe in wonder.Nothing is impossible.so we view that Euthanasia should not be legeled(!)Euthanasia stops the medicine developing.If the patients require using euthanasia, doctors won’t try their best to save patients.The medicine will stop progress.If making euthanasia is made legal, patients who use euthanasia will be protected by law.The doctors’ right will be obvious.Doctors are given too much power, and can be wrong or unethical.Patients put their faith and trust in the opinions of their doctor.people abuse euthanasia when it is legalized, it can harm people lives.In the name of euthanasia, carry out committing suicide.Miracle cures or recoveries can occur.You can never underestimate the power of the human spirit.It demeans the value of human life.In this country, human life means something.It could open the floodgates to non-critical patient suicides and other abuses.Any loosening of the assisted-suicide laws could eventually lead to abuses of the privilege.Many religions prohibit suicide and the intentional killing of others.The most basic commandment is “You shall not kill”.Insurancecompanies may put undue pressure on doctors to avoid heroic measures or recommend the assisted-suicide procedure.Health insurance providers are under tremendous pressure to keep premiums down.Euthanasia can become a means of health care cost containment..Physicians and other medical care people should not be involved in directly causing death.Mercy killing is morally incorrect and should be forbidden by law.It's a homicide and murdering another human cannot be rationalized under any circumstances.Human life deserves exceptional security and protection.Advanced medical technology has made it possible to enhance human life span and quality of life.Palliative care and rehabilitation centers are better alternatives to help disabled or patients approaching death live a pain-free and better life.Family members influencing the patient's decision into euthanasia for personal gains like wealth inheritance is another issue.There is no way you can be really sure if the decision towards assisted suicide is voluntary or forced by others.Mercy killing would cause decline in medical care and cause victimization of the most vulnerable society.Would mercy killing transform itself from the “right to die” to “right to kill”? How would one assess whether a disorder of mental nature qualifies mercy killing? What if the pain threshold is below optimum and the patient perceives the circumstances to be not worthy of living? How would one know whether the wish to die is the result of unbalanced thought process or a logical decision in mentally ill patients? What if the individual chooses assisted suicide as an option and the family wouldn't agree? As to face the parting, helplessness, loss of self-control, fear of death and sorrow and so the majority of patients will experience mental suffering.In this psychological requirement under the “Euthanasia”, we can say that he isreasonable? “According to the study of suicide, suicide and treatable mental illness is intrinsically related, but not the fatal disease, a study found that in 44 patients with advanced cancer, only three thought about suicide, but are there is a serious depression.Another study shows that 85 suicides, only one person suffering from terminal illness, and 90-100% of the suicides were suffering from obvious mental illness.Undeniably, the modern medical practice slow death process, often cited the loss of personal characteristics of patients Mei, dignity, independence and autonomy.However, the expression of active euthanasia as acts of personal autonomy, it is wrong.Reasons:(a)Since active euthanasia need help, then it is not an individual matter, but the open or in the public thing.(B)under the public recognition to self-defense, capital punishment and justice in the form of war, murder, only to defend the life for everyone, not to the benefit of those killed.So, even if death is painful relief, can not be lightly taken away the right to life committed to personal.(C)even if the person's self-determination recognized the right to choose to die, that does not mean the right to ask others to kill themselves, does not include the right to authorize self to kill others.(D)autonomy, including the right of slavery has never been their own, in other words, the right to freedom does not mean the right not to freedom.So to maintain the autonomy, the need to protect life, to give others their right to life is not trampling the principle of maintaining independence.Therefore, individual autonomy and social need and public objectives and values to be consistent.结尾active euthanasia may gradually lose its spontaneity, and thus out of(i)”secret euthanasia“, meaning that without their own consent, to be a doctor euthanized.(Ii)”forced euthanasia“,meaning patients suffering from terminal illness would be coercion to lure choose euthanasia to relieve their families in the economic and psychological pressures, and save limited resources of society, the patients chose to die, do not feel life is a burden or tired of life, but he felt the burden of someone else, and that others dislike.(Iii)”Deputy euthanasia“ means to allo w patients who lack capacity to self-determination by the people ”proxy decision“ to euthanasia.(Iv)”Discrimination against euthanasia,“ the crisis is the number of types of patients such as the poverty stricken or belonging to ethnic minorities, may be ”clever“ to force that ”euthanasia“ requirement, the mercy of others.Made ill patients caught in the dilemma of both the opposition between the yield, resulting in additional unnecessary fear and anxiety.The information may be heard: ”Death is terrible!Your best choice of euthanasia.“ of the slip waves, is once the ”euthanasia“ is legalized, its use will inevitably extend to other types of patients but not the dying, if not cure patients, but not incurable disease, then the risk of Alzheimer's disease or brain degradation, even those born with severe disabilities Down syndrome baby..And so on.So, if this argument, once established, will only create panic and fear that they will be forcibly sent to ”euthanasia“ in the ranks.Therefore, I agree Frasen say, ”human life, merely the possibility of error, is enough to completely reject the“ euthanasia.” “ Euthanasia is humane because it helps to hasten the death of terminally ill patient.Death, as natural as birth, is sometimes a hard process that requires assistance, and euthanasia is part of such assistance.People have the right to die.It is unnecessary to maintain life artificially beyond the point when people will never regain consciousness.Extending an incurably ill patient’s lifemeans the same as aggravating his pain.Efforts should not be made to perpetuate what has become a meaningless existence.Euthanasia can bring mental and physical release to the patient and his family when he is terminally ill and has no prospect of recovering.Mercy killing is motivated by nothing but love and sympathy for the dying patient.Most of the terminally ill patients themselves want to die with dignity and peace instead of agony and degradation.Medical treatment for a comatose patient cause great burden economically for the hospital and the patient’s family.It is inhumane to perform euthanasia no matter how painless the process is.Anyone who voluntarily, knowingly or premeditatedly takes the life of another, even one minute prior to death, is a killer.Euthanasia is a criminal offense because it involves the killing of a person.Legalized euthanasia will invite abuse of human life because any form of murder many be conveniently dubbed “mercy killing ”by unscrupulous people.Euthanasia raises many moral issues since it implies that active measures are taken to terminate human life.Doctors and nurses should do everything they can to save dying patients instead of hastening their death by active measures.The instinct for self-preservation is the strongest instinct that human beings possess.It is untrue that any patient himself should want to die.Doctors and nurses involved in euthanasia have discredited their profession, for euthanasia is a violation of the fundamental medical principle to save human life.Mercy killing is one of the most controversial issues in the world of medicine.As the picture given above depicts, A late sick mother desperately ill son request for euthanasia.But the son was cut for this。

Should euthanasia be legalized?What is euthanasia?Euthanasia is the practice of killing someone who is very ill and will never get better in order to end their suffering, usually done at their request or with their consent.My opinion: euthanasia should be legalizedReasons + examples:1. Showing respect for the dying patients.2. The medical cost of a terminally illness is pretty high. People use 80% of the medical cost during their last month, which however won’t change their destiny3. Reducing patients’ pain4. Reduce the pain of the ill’s family.Dr. Jack Kevorkian was charged with first-degree murder in the death of a 52-year-old man with Lou Gehrig's disease. He injected him with a drug that ended up killing him!! He had helped more than 130 people end their lives and though NOTHING was wrong with it, he was putting them out of their misery, and in some instances, there was video and signed documents stating that this was in fact true. With this case I first mentioned the wife of the man even testified and said she absolutely didn't consider it murder, she was thankful someone could release him from all the pain and suffering he was going through.Countries that allows the existence of euthanasia legally:The Netherlands, Belgium, Luxemburg, Switzerland, Washington and Oregon state in us, Montana in Canada., Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Norway, Slovakia, Spain and Sweden.Most of them are developed countries. the acceptance of euthanasia indicates the degree of civilization of the country.In 2010, the Netherlands, the number of people that choose euthanasia initiatively accounts for 2.8% of the total number.SummaryIn a word, euthanasia is not a humanity killer but a pain killer, a way for those who cannot tolerate any longer to relieve. We should not regard it as a horrible thing. Euthanasia, the symbol of humanity and civilization, is calling for our support to stand in the shiny hall of law. So, my friends, let’s make our joint efforts to walk to humanity!。

如果安乐死合法化(Should Euthanasia Be Legalized)euthanasia，a quiet and easy death，or “mercy killing” as we call it recently has made the headlines frequently. many people applaud it and argue that euthanasia should be legalized.as is pointed out，to practise euthanasia can benefit both the patient and his family. to a terminally ill person who is suffering excruciating pains day and night or living “like a vegetable”，to be allowed to end his life painlessly is a good release. to his family it is also a big relief considering the financial and emotional drain on them that having to sustain his life entails. however，the legalization of euthanasia may also bring with it problems our society has not previously faced. is it humane，for example，that a terminally ill patient is thus caused to feel guilty for remaining alive because he does not want to die？is it wise that a patient is killed alive simply because of a mistaken terminal diagnosis？and is it possible that euthanasia could be taken advantage of for some ulterior or even criminal purposes？since the legalization of euthanasia will raise serious moral and social issues，the decision our society makes about euthanasia will undoubtedly have tremendous consequences in society.。

支持安乐死的英语作文英文回答：Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide, is a topic that sparks heated debates worldwide. Proponents of euthanasia argue that individuals should have the right to end their own lives with dignity, especially when faced with terminal illnesses, unbearable pain, or severe mental health conditions. They emphasize the principle of patient autonomy and the importance of respecting individuals' wishes. Additionally, they contend that euthanasia can alleviate suffering and prevent prolonged agony, providing comfort and peace to those who choose it.Opponents of euthanasia, on the other hand, raise concerns about the potential for abuse, coercion, and slippery slopes. They argue that legalizing euthanasia could lead to a devaluation of life and increased pressure on vulnerable individuals to end their lives. Critics also express concerns about the potential for misdiagnosis andmistakes, emphasizing the need for extreme caution and a robust regulatory framework. Furthermore, they argue that euthanasia undermines the role of palliative care and hospice services, which focus on providing comfort and pain management without ending life.In many countries, the legal status of euthanasia varies. Some jurisdictions have legalized euthanasia under strict conditions, while others prohibit it entirely. In the United States, for example, euthanasia is generally illegal, but certain states have legalized physician-assisted suicide under specific circumstances.The debate surrounding euthanasia is complex and involves a range of ethical, legal, medical, and religious considerations. There are valid arguments on both sides of the issue, and it is a matter that requires careful deliberation and compassionate dialogue.中文回答：安乐死。

对安乐死的看法英语作文英文回答：Euthanasia is an extremely controversial topic that has been debated for centuries. There are many different perspectives on the issue, and it is important to consider all sides of the argument before forming an opinion.One of the main arguments in favor of euthanasia isthat it allows people to die with dignity. When a person is terminally ill and suffering from unbearable pain, they may choose to end their life on their own terms. This can be a very difficult decision, but it can also be a peaceful and dignified way to die.Another argument in favor of euthanasia is that it can relieve suffering. For people who are terminally ill, the pain and suffering can be unbearable. Euthanasia can provide a way to end this suffering and allow the person to die in peace.However, there are also many arguments against euthanasia. One of the main concerns is that it could lead to a slippery slope. If euthanasia is legalized for people who are terminally ill, it could eventually be expanded to include people who are not terminally ill. This could lead to a situation where people are euthanized for reasons that are not truly related to their health.Another concern about euthanasia is that it could be abused. Doctors could euthanize patients without their consent or without ensuring that they are truly terminally ill. This could lead to a situation where people are euthanized against their will or without their knowledge.Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to legalize euthanasia is a complex one. There are many factors to consider, and there is no easy answer. It is important to weigh all of the arguments carefully before forming an opinion on this issue.中文回答：安乐死是一个极其有争议的话题，几个世纪以来一直争论不休。

The Dilemma of Euthanasia: My Perspective Euthanasia, a term often debated with passions high, presents a complex ethical and moral challenge in modern society. While some argue that it is a compassionate act that allows terminally ill patients to peacefully end their lives, others maintain that it violates the sanctity oflife and could potentially be abused. My own stance on this controversial topic is nuanced, balancing between compassion for those in unbearable pain and respect for the inherent value of human life.I believe that the right to die with dignity should be granted to terminally ill patients who are in unbearable physical and mental pain, and who have exhausted all possible medical treatments. Such patients often face a daily struggle that is both physically and psychologically devastating. They may be trapped in a state of constant discomfort, unable to enjoy any quality of life. In such cases, the option of euthanasia can offer a release from this unbearable torment, allowing them to depart the world with dignity and peace.However, I am firmly opposed to the legalization of euthanasia without strict regulations and thorough safeguards. The fear of abuse is real, and it is imperative that we ensure that euthanasia is not misused as a means to eliminate the elderly or infirm, or as a way to avoid the financial and emotional burdens of caring for a loved one. Strict eligibility criteria must be established, and there must be a robust system of checks and balances to prevent any misuse of the law.Moreover, I believe that euthanasia should only be considered as a last resort, after all other avenues have been explored. This includes providing comprehensive palliative care and support to patients and their families, ensuring that they are not left to face their ordeal alone. Palliative care aims to improve the quality of life of patients by relieving their symptoms and addressing their emotional and spiritual needs. It is a holistic approach that should be a cornerstone of any euthanasia debate.In addition, I主张对于安乐死的讨论和教育应该更加普及和深入。

英语安乐死正方辩论Good morning ,everyone ; my name is Yang .I am the first debater on positive side. Here are my opinions.1 ，First I will state the definaton of euthanasia,that is people who are attacked by incurable disease can’t surffer from the pains and decide to employ a humane way to end their lives without pain.2 ，Second, as with survival, death is a kind of human rights. When he felt happier than survival of death, he has the right to choose death, society should meet the people's needs, and give every person who is suffering incurable disease to choose the right euthanasia .So citizens have the right to choose the way of death. It is another case of freedom of choice.3 ，Third , for mortally ill patients, long life actually only means extend pain. For them to end their lives is a kind of happiness, It provides a way to relieve extreme pain, and this conforms to humanism.4 ，Fouth , this way can free up medical funds to help other people and reduce the burden of family and society. In this regard,it takes family members’ interest and supplies a lot of benefits to society.5 ，so according to the previous paper, we have reasons to believe that euthanasia is a proper way, not only does it respect personal dignity,but also helps with social development. And it is the performance of human civilization progress too.That’s all my ideas ,thank you。

安乐死的看法英语作文Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide, is a controversial topic that has been debated for decades. Some people believe that it is a humane way to end the suffering of those with terminal illnesses, while others argue that it goes against the value of human life. In my opinion, euthanasia should be legalized in certain circumstances.Firstly, euthanasia can end the unbearable pain and suffering of patients who are terminally ill or in a vegetative state. These patients often have no hope of recovery and are only being kept alive by machines or medication. It is cruel to force them to continue living in agony when there is no chance of improvement. By allowing them to choose to end their own lives with the assistance of a medical professional, we can provide them with a peaceful and dignified death.Secondly, legalizing euthanasia can help to reduce healthcare costs. Patients who are terminally ill or in avegetative state require extensive medical care, which can be very expensive. By allowing them to choose euthanasia, we can reduce the amount of money spent on their care and allocate those resources to other patients who have a chance of recovery.However, there are also valid concerns about the legalization of euthanasia. One of the main arguments against it is that it could be abused by caregivers or family members who may pressure patients into choosing euthanasia in order to save money or avoid the burden of caring for them. To prevent this, strict regulations and guidelines would need to be put in place to ensure that patients are making a voluntary and informed decision.In conclusion, while euthanasia is a complex issue with valid arguments on both sides, I believe that it should be legalized in certain circumstances. It is a humane way to end the suffering of those with terminal illnesses and can also help to reduce healthcare costs. However, it is important to ensure that strict regulations are in place toprevent abuse and ensure that patients are making a voluntary and informed decision.。

安乐死辩论英文回答：The euthanasia debate is a complex and controversial one. It raises a number of important ethical, legal, and medical issues that can be difficult to navigate.One of the main arguments in favor of euthanasia isthat it can provide a compassionate and dignified end for people who are suffering from a terminal illness. In such cases, euthanasia can allow people to die on their own terms, without having to endure unnecessary pain and suffering.Another argument in favor of euthanasia is that it can give people more control over their own lives. When people know that they have the option of euthanasia, they can make informed decisions about their end-of-life care. This can give them a sense of empowerment and peace of mind.However, there are also a number of arguments against euthanasia. One of the main concerns is that it could be abused. For example, people could be pressured into ending their lives against their will. There is also the concern that euthanasia could lead to a devaluation of life. If euthanasia is seen as an acceptable way to end a life, it could lead to people giving up on life too easily.Another concern about euthanasia is that it could be difficult to regulate. It can be difficult to determine who is eligible for euthanasia and who is not. There is also the risk that euthanasia could be used for non-medical purposes, such as to eliminate people who are seen as a burden on society.Overall, the euthanasia debate is a complex and challenging one. There are a number of valid arguments both for and against euthanasia. It is important to weigh all of the arguments carefully before forming an opinion on this issue.中文回答：安乐死辩论是一个复杂且有争议的话题。

支持安乐死的英语作文英文回答:Euthanasia, commonly known as assisted suicide or mercy killing, has been a topic of heated debate worldwide. Advocates argue that it offers a dignified end to those suffering from incurable illnesses, while opponents raise concerns about ethical, legal, and moral implications. Asfor me, I firmly support the legalization of euthanasia for several reasons.Firstly, it's about autonomy and individual rights. Every person should have the right to make decisions about their own life, especially when facing unbearable suffering. Denying someone the right to end their life in a peaceful and dignified manner is a violation of their autonomy.Imagine a scenario where a terminally ill patient is in excruciating pain with no hope for recovery. Despite receiving palliative care, the suffering persists,diminishing their quality of life. In such cases, euthanasia provides a compassionate option to end their suffering on their own terms.Furthermore, legalizing euthanasia ensures proper regulation and safeguards to prevent abuse. Strict protocols can be established to ensure that the decision is made voluntarily by the patient, free from any external pressure or coercion. For instance, in countries where euthanasia is legal, there are stringent criteria and procedures that must be followed, including multiple assessments by healthcare professionals and a waiting period.Opponents often argue that legalizing euthanasia undermines the value of human life and opens the door to slippery slopes, where vulnerable individuals might be coerced into ending their lives. However, stringent regulations and oversight can mitigate these concerns. Moreover, the option of euthanasia doesn't diminish the value of life; rather, it respects the individual's autonomy and dignity.In addition, legalizing euthanasia can alleviate the burden on families and caregivers. Witnessing a loved one suffer immensely without any hope of improvement can be emotionally and psychologically taxing. Knowing that their loved one had the option of a peaceful and dignified death can bring solace and closure to families.Lastly, it's essential to acknowledge that euthanasia is not about promoting death but about providing a humane option for those facing unbearable suffering. It's a decision that should be made with careful consideration and in consultation with medical professionals and loved ones.In conclusion, I believe that legalizing euthanasia is a compassionate and humane response to alleviate the suffering of terminally ill patients. It upholds the principles of autonomy, dignity, and compassion, ensuring that individuals have the right to die with dignity and without unnecessary pain and suffering.中文回答：安乐死，通常被称为辅助自杀或仁慈杀，是一个在全球范围内引发激烈争议的话题。

On euthanasiaEuthanasia is a controversial issue around the world. With people increasing requirements of euthanasia , more and more countries and districts have made euthanasia legal. Different people hold different ideas about it and here the argument it is--Should euthanasia be allowed or not?Let us have a look first to the definition of euthanasia.Euthanasia refers to the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain and suffering. From the definition we could learn that it is mainly used in people terminally ill, near death or in extreme pain.Many people suppose that those patients who are in such pain should be granted a better way to death instead of being suffered all the time without any hope. There are three points to support the argument. Firstly, as the most famous psychiatrist Norman Cousins says, ‘Death is not the greatest loss of life, but the living d eath’, people who show a little mercy on others in pain may understand the use of euthanasia. When you see those patients with incurable disease lying on the bed are inserted oxygen lines and varies machines in their bodies, will you turn your back upon the request of euthanasia? Euthanasia can help patients relieve their pains so why not be allowed? Secondly, if we insisted in cure, the result of itwould not be so satisfied to some extent. For example, children who suffered from polio~~~(各种后遗症，但这个例子仿佛不太恰当的样子orz)And also, 有些人会将其与人权划勾，但当一个人无法拥有意识，连生和死都决定不了，何来权力？（翻译无能orz）Others hold the opinion that euthanasia should be banned like the majority of countries do. It is reasonable to have such an appeal. Some people against the euthanasia because lives are so valuable that we do not have any right to end other lives at random. As an old saying goes, ‘a living dog is better than a dead lion’. Life is full of opportunities and possibilities, and all we should do is to keep it and never give it up. After all, to live is better than to die. Some people think the use of euthanasia is a kind of ‘murder’ which ends other lives in a subjective way. Although those patients who suffer from severe disease are painful, they may be still optimistic about their situation. It is one-sided and unfair to end others’lives as a bystander. What’s more, since euthanasia is not legalized that is not easy to get, which means it contains enormous business opportunities for the wrong crowd, some patients only buy it through illegal channels, resulting in a series of illegal profit chain. From my perspective, I。

对安乐死的看法英语作文English:I believe that euthanasia, or assisted suicide, is a complex and controversial issue. On one hand, it can be seen as a compassionate choice for individuals who are suffering from terminal illness and wish to end their lives on their own terms. It can also be viewed as a way to alleviate the emotional and financial burden on their families. However, on the other hand, there are ethical and moral considerations surrounding the intentional ending of a person's life, regardless of the circumstances. There are also concerns about the potential for abuse and coercion in the practice of euthanasia. Ultimately, I believe that the focus should be on improving palliative care and providing support for individuals facing terminal illnesses, rather than legalizing euthanasia as a solution.中文翻译:我认为安乐死，或者辅助自杀，是一个复杂而有争议的问题。

安乐死合法化正方：We think it’s necessary. On one hand, we can save our limiting medical resources for those who need treatment than any other people. On the other hand, we can keep patients from endless paint.我们认为这是有必要的。

一方面，我们可以节约有限的医疗资源给其他更需要的治疗的病人。

另一方面，我们可以解脱这些受着无尽的痛苦的病人。

补充观点：1.Euthanasia can release the stress of the society, if the patients can’t do any contribution.如果那个病人无法做出任何贡献，那么安乐死可以减轻社会的负担。

2.Euthanasia can free the patients who are under heavy paint.安乐死可以解脱那些正承受着巨大痛苦的病人。

3. A person’s life belongs to himself, he has access to end his life.一个人的生命属于他自己，他有权结束自己的生命。

反方：I think we should n’t make euthanasia legal. Otherwise, some people may commit suicide through this way, which offer them an easy way to die. In addition, it can be an legal way to deprive(剥夺) people’s life, for those who have evil intentions. So, I don’t agree this point.补充观点：1. Euthanasia is a rejection of the importance and value of human life安乐死是拒绝了人类生活的意义和价值1.The poor will truly be killed by poverty through euthanasia, because of no money fortreatment.穷人会真正地被贫穷以这种形式给杀死，因为没钱治疗。

安乐死辩论英文回答：The debate on euthanasia, often referred to as assisted dying or mercy killing, has sparked a myriad of ethical, legal, and societal considerations that have engrossed philosophers, politicians, and the general public alike. At the heart of the debate lies the question of whether individuals have the right to end their own lives with the assistance of a medical professional.Proponents of euthanasia argue that individuals should have autonomy over their own bodies and should be able to make decisions regarding their own deaths. They contendthat euthanasia is a compassionate and humane option for terminally ill patients who are suffering from unbearable pain or who have lost their quality of life. Advocates often cite examples of individuals who have suffered from debilitating conditions such as motor neuron disease or Alzheimer's disease, where euthanasia has provided themwith a dignified end.Opponents of euthanasia, on the other hand, raise concerns about the potential for abuse and the slippery slope argument. They argue that legalizing euthanasia could lead to a devaluation of life and that vulnerable individuals may be coerced into ending their lives against their will. Opponents also express worries about the possibility of mistakes being made in the assessment of a patient's condition or prognosis. As an example, they point to cases where patients who were initially diagnosed with a terminal illness were later found to have misdiagnoses and went on to live for many years.The euthanasia debate is complex and multifaceted, with strong arguments on both sides. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to legalize euthanasia is a matter of public policy that must be carefully considered by each society.中文回答：安乐死争论，又称协助死亡或仁慈杀人，引发了无数的伦理、法律和社会考量，吸引了哲学家、政治家和普通民众的关注。